Specific Rhythm Auditory Stimulation for Attention: A Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial.

IF 2.4 4区 医学 Q3 NEUROSCIENCES
Clinical Psychopharmacology and Neuroscience Pub Date : 2025-05-31 Epub Date: 2025-01-22 DOI:10.9758/cpn.24.1247
Ah Ram Kim, Jae Won Kim, Na Young Kim, Dong Woo Kang
{"title":"Specific Rhythm Auditory Stimulation for Attention: A Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial.","authors":"Ah Ram Kim, Jae Won Kim, Na Young Kim, Dong Woo Kang","doi":"10.9758/cpn.24.1247","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Despite the prevalence of music listening among individuals performing tasks that require sustained attention, the impact of various components of rhythmic auditory stimulation on concentration remains inconclusive. The aim of this pilot study was to determine the efficacy of a novel specific rhythmic auditory stimulation (SAS) on attentional performance, including vigilance, orientation, and executive control, in healthy adults in comparison with other auditory stimulation and silence conditions.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This block-randomized study included 27 male and 27 female participants with a mean age of 31.52 years. Participants underwent the Attention Network Test (ANT) and the Frankfurt Attention Inventory (FAIR) under three auditory stimulation conditions: SAS, traditional rhythmic auditory stimulation (TAS), and a control condition of silence (CON). To assess potential sex differences in attentional abilities in response to auditory stimuli, nine participants were grouped into each sex-specific condition. All data collected were subjected to statistical analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The results showed that SAS resulted in significantly different mean reaction times, alerting and orienting effects on the ANT and P scores, and the percentage of Q and C scores on the FAIR test compared to TAS and CON (<i>p</i> < 0.05). However, no differences were found between males and females for any of the variables of the ANT and FAIR test under the same auditory stimulus conditions.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>It is suggested that the new auditory stimuli used in this study may be more effective in improving attention than TAS or CON in healthy adults, irrespective of sex.</p>","PeriodicalId":10420,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Psychopharmacology and Neuroscience","volume":"23 2","pages":"286-299"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12000661/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Psychopharmacology and Neuroscience","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.9758/cpn.24.1247","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/22 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Despite the prevalence of music listening among individuals performing tasks that require sustained attention, the impact of various components of rhythmic auditory stimulation on concentration remains inconclusive. The aim of this pilot study was to determine the efficacy of a novel specific rhythmic auditory stimulation (SAS) on attentional performance, including vigilance, orientation, and executive control, in healthy adults in comparison with other auditory stimulation and silence conditions.

Methods: This block-randomized study included 27 male and 27 female participants with a mean age of 31.52 years. Participants underwent the Attention Network Test (ANT) and the Frankfurt Attention Inventory (FAIR) under three auditory stimulation conditions: SAS, traditional rhythmic auditory stimulation (TAS), and a control condition of silence (CON). To assess potential sex differences in attentional abilities in response to auditory stimuli, nine participants were grouped into each sex-specific condition. All data collected were subjected to statistical analysis.

Results: The results showed that SAS resulted in significantly different mean reaction times, alerting and orienting effects on the ANT and P scores, and the percentage of Q and C scores on the FAIR test compared to TAS and CON (p < 0.05). However, no differences were found between males and females for any of the variables of the ANT and FAIR test under the same auditory stimulus conditions.

Conclusion: It is suggested that the new auditory stimuli used in this study may be more effective in improving attention than TAS or CON in healthy adults, irrespective of sex.

特定节奏听觉刺激引起注意:一项先导随机对照试验。
目的:尽管在执行需要持续注意力的任务的个体中流行听音乐,但节奏性听觉刺激的各种组成部分对注意力的影响仍不确定。本初步研究的目的是确定一种新的特定节奏性听觉刺激(SAS)对健康成人的注意力表现(包括警觉性、定向和执行控制)的效果,并与其他听觉刺激和沉默条件进行比较。方法:本研究纳入男性27例,女性27例,平均年龄31.52岁。被试在三种听觉刺激条件下进行注意网络测试(ANT)和法兰克福注意量表(FAIR): SAS、传统节奏听觉刺激(TAS)和沉默控制条件(CON)。为了评估对听觉刺激反应的注意力能力的潜在性别差异,9名参与者被分为不同的性别。所有收集到的数据都进行了统计分析。结果:与TAS和CON相比,SAS对受试者的平均反应时间、对ANT和P得分以及FAIR测试中Q和C得分的警觉性和定向性影响显著差异(P < 0.05)。然而,在相同的听觉刺激条件下,男性和女性在ANT和FAIR测试的任何变量上都没有发现差异。结论:本研究中使用的新听觉刺激在改善健康成人注意力方面可能比TAS或CON更有效,无论性别如何。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Clinical Psychopharmacology and Neuroscience
Clinical Psychopharmacology and Neuroscience NEUROSCIENCESPHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY-PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
12.50%
发文量
81
期刊介绍: Clinical Psychopharmacology and Neuroscience (Clin Psychopharmacol Neurosci) launched in 2003, is the official journal of The Korean College of Neuropsychopharmacology (KCNP), and the associate journal for Asian College of Neuropsychopharmacology (AsCNP). This journal aims to publish evidence-based, scientifically written articles related to clinical and preclinical studies in the field of psychopharmacology and neuroscience. This journal intends to foster and encourage communications between psychiatrist, neuroscientist and all related experts in Asia as well as worldwide. It is published four times a year at the last day of February, May, August, and November.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信