{"title":"Visual rehabilitation in keratoconus by altering corneal shape using the corneal crosslinking pen: initial results.","authors":"Asher A Saks, Conrad Saks, Benjamin Bert","doi":"10.1007/s00417-025-06825-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>A Phase I/II trial to evaluate the initial safety and performance of a novel corneal crosslinking device, the Corneal Crosslinking Pen in keratoconus patients. This was a prospective exploratory study with 12 months of follow up.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Twenty-one eyes of 21 patients aged 14-27 years and diagnosed with progressive keratoconus were enrolled and treated unilaterally. Corneal crosslinking (CXL) following an accelerated epi-off protocol with riboflavin was done using the Corneal Crosslinking Pen. Effectiveness endpoints included changes in astigmatism, maximum keratometry (KMax), and best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) compared to baseline. Safety included adverse events and changes in pachymetry, intraocular pressure (IOP), and endothelial cell count (ECC).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Astigmatism was significantly reduced at 12 months by a mean (95% CI) of 0.56 (0.10, 1.03) D. KMax was also reduced by a mean of 0.63 D, but this was not significant. BCVA improved significantly by nearly four lines of vision (- 0.38; logMAR). No corneal thinning was observed; pachymetry, IOP and ECC all remained stable across 12 months. Adverse events were infrequent and mild.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>These early results suggest that the Corneal Crosslinking Pen was safe and effective for CXL. Future studies will seek to confirm the large improvement seen for BCVA and elucidate a potential mechanism.</p>","PeriodicalId":12795,"journal":{"name":"Graefe’s Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Graefe’s Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00417-025-06825-6","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: A Phase I/II trial to evaluate the initial safety and performance of a novel corneal crosslinking device, the Corneal Crosslinking Pen in keratoconus patients. This was a prospective exploratory study with 12 months of follow up.
Methods: Twenty-one eyes of 21 patients aged 14-27 years and diagnosed with progressive keratoconus were enrolled and treated unilaterally. Corneal crosslinking (CXL) following an accelerated epi-off protocol with riboflavin was done using the Corneal Crosslinking Pen. Effectiveness endpoints included changes in astigmatism, maximum keratometry (KMax), and best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) compared to baseline. Safety included adverse events and changes in pachymetry, intraocular pressure (IOP), and endothelial cell count (ECC).
Results: Astigmatism was significantly reduced at 12 months by a mean (95% CI) of 0.56 (0.10, 1.03) D. KMax was also reduced by a mean of 0.63 D, but this was not significant. BCVA improved significantly by nearly four lines of vision (- 0.38; logMAR). No corneal thinning was observed; pachymetry, IOP and ECC all remained stable across 12 months. Adverse events were infrequent and mild.
Conclusion: These early results suggest that the Corneal Crosslinking Pen was safe and effective for CXL. Future studies will seek to confirm the large improvement seen for BCVA and elucidate a potential mechanism.
期刊介绍:
Graefe''s Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology is a distinguished international journal that presents original clinical reports and clini-cally relevant experimental studies. Founded in 1854 by Albrecht von Graefe to serve as a source of useful clinical information and a stimulus for discussion, the journal has published articles by leading ophthalmologists and vision research scientists for more than a century. With peer review by an international Editorial Board and prompt English-language publication, Graefe''s Archive provides rapid dissemination of clinical and clinically related experimental information.