Enhanced Recovery After Surgery plus preoperative antifrailty in frail patients with adult spinal deformity: a two-step propensity score-matched analysis.

IF 3.1 2区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Journal of neurosurgery. Spine Pub Date : 2025-04-25 Print Date: 2025-10-01 DOI:10.3171/2025.1.SPINE241372
Shuaikang Wang, Peng Wang, Di Han, Xiangyu Li, Wei Wang, Shibao Lu
{"title":"Enhanced Recovery After Surgery plus preoperative antifrailty in frail patients with adult spinal deformity: a two-step propensity score-matched analysis.","authors":"Shuaikang Wang, Peng Wang, Di Han, Xiangyu Li, Wei Wang, Shibao Lu","doi":"10.3171/2025.1.SPINE241372","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The objective of this study was to evaluate the effect of Enhanced Recovery After Surgery plus preoperative antifrailty (PAFERAS) on surgical outcomes of frail patients who underwent long-segment surgery for adult spinal deformity (ASD).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This is a retrospective study using a prospectively collected ASD database. Patients who underwent open long-segment fusion surgery (≥ 5 levels) for ASD between January 2017 and March 2024 were classified as nonfrail (NF; 5-factor modified frailty index [mFI-5] score = 0), prefrail (PF; mFI-5 score = 1), or frail (mFI-5 score ≥ 2) based on their physical activity and comorbidities. For frail patients, the antifrailty interventions of the PAFERAS program focused on preoperative exercise and nutritional optimization. NF/PF patients of the PAFERAS group received preoperative dietary counseling, nutritional education, and standardized rehabilitation advice. Meanwhile, frail patients were divided into non-PAFERAS (before January 2019) and PAFERAS (after January 2019) groups based on whether they received PAFERAS care or not. Frail patients with antifrailty (AF group) were compared with PF patients, NF patients, and frail patients in the non-PAFERAS group. AF patients were propensity score matched 1:1 to the NF, PF, and non-PAFERAS groups patients based on age, pelvic incidence minus lumbar lordosis, and intraoperative estimated blood loss.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 286 patients from the PAFERAS group (31.8% in the NF group, 46.9% in the PF group, and 21.3% in the AF group) and 142 patients from the non-PAFERAS group were included in the final analysis. The 1st day of assisted walking occurred, on average, 1 day earlier in the AF group than in frail patients from the non-PAFERAS group (3.52 vs 2.54 days, p = 0.016). The postoperative length of hospital stay (LOS) for frail patients significantly decreased from 14.29 days before PAFERAS to 10.64 days after PAFERAS (p = 0.011). No significant differences were observed between the matched AF and NF/PF groups in the 1st day of assisted walking and the 1st day of bowel movement. There were no differences between the AF and NF/PF groups in postoperative LOS, nonhome discharge rate, rates of severe complications, and rates of minor complications.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The PAFERAS protocol significantly improves the return of physiological function and the LOS for frail patients undergoing ASD surgery. After implementing preoperative exercise and nutritional optimization for frail patients, the recovery process of physiological function and LOS in patients with frailty were similar to those in NF or PF patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":16562,"journal":{"name":"Journal of neurosurgery. Spine","volume":" ","pages":"405-415"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of neurosurgery. Spine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3171/2025.1.SPINE241372","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/10/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"Print","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: The objective of this study was to evaluate the effect of Enhanced Recovery After Surgery plus preoperative antifrailty (PAFERAS) on surgical outcomes of frail patients who underwent long-segment surgery for adult spinal deformity (ASD).

Methods: This is a retrospective study using a prospectively collected ASD database. Patients who underwent open long-segment fusion surgery (≥ 5 levels) for ASD between January 2017 and March 2024 were classified as nonfrail (NF; 5-factor modified frailty index [mFI-5] score = 0), prefrail (PF; mFI-5 score = 1), or frail (mFI-5 score ≥ 2) based on their physical activity and comorbidities. For frail patients, the antifrailty interventions of the PAFERAS program focused on preoperative exercise and nutritional optimization. NF/PF patients of the PAFERAS group received preoperative dietary counseling, nutritional education, and standardized rehabilitation advice. Meanwhile, frail patients were divided into non-PAFERAS (before January 2019) and PAFERAS (after January 2019) groups based on whether they received PAFERAS care or not. Frail patients with antifrailty (AF group) were compared with PF patients, NF patients, and frail patients in the non-PAFERAS group. AF patients were propensity score matched 1:1 to the NF, PF, and non-PAFERAS groups patients based on age, pelvic incidence minus lumbar lordosis, and intraoperative estimated blood loss.

Results: A total of 286 patients from the PAFERAS group (31.8% in the NF group, 46.9% in the PF group, and 21.3% in the AF group) and 142 patients from the non-PAFERAS group were included in the final analysis. The 1st day of assisted walking occurred, on average, 1 day earlier in the AF group than in frail patients from the non-PAFERAS group (3.52 vs 2.54 days, p = 0.016). The postoperative length of hospital stay (LOS) for frail patients significantly decreased from 14.29 days before PAFERAS to 10.64 days after PAFERAS (p = 0.011). No significant differences were observed between the matched AF and NF/PF groups in the 1st day of assisted walking and the 1st day of bowel movement. There were no differences between the AF and NF/PF groups in postoperative LOS, nonhome discharge rate, rates of severe complications, and rates of minor complications.

Conclusions: The PAFERAS protocol significantly improves the return of physiological function and the LOS for frail patients undergoing ASD surgery. After implementing preoperative exercise and nutritional optimization for frail patients, the recovery process of physiological function and LOS in patients with frailty were similar to those in NF or PF patients.

成人脊柱畸形体弱患者手术后增强恢复加术前抗衰弱:两步倾向评分匹配分析。
目的:本研究的目的是评估术后增强恢复加术前抗衰弱(PAFERAS)对接受成人脊柱畸形(ASD)长节段手术的体弱患者手术效果的影响。方法:采用前瞻性收集的ASD数据库进行回顾性研究。2017年1月至2024年3月期间接受开放长节段融合手术(≥5节段)的ASD患者被归类为非虚弱(NF;5因素修正的脆弱指数[mFI-5]评分= 0),虚弱(PF;mFI-5评分= 1),或虚弱(mFI-5评分≥2),这取决于他们的身体活动和合并症。对于体弱患者,PAFERAS项目的抗衰弱干预措施侧重于术前锻炼和营养优化。PAFERAS组NF/PF患者接受术前饮食咨询、营养教育和标准化康复建议。同时,根据是否接受过PAFERAS护理,将体弱患者分为非PAFERAS组(2019年1月之前)和PAFERAS组(2019年1月之后)。将虚弱的抗衰弱患者(AF组)与PF患者、NF患者和非paferas组虚弱患者进行比较。根据年龄、骨盆发生率减去腰椎前凸和术中估计失血量,AF患者与NF、PF和非paeras组患者的倾向评分为1:1匹配。结果:共纳入PAFERAS组286例患者(NF组31.8%,PF组46.9%,AF组21.3%)和非PAFERAS组142例患者。AF组患者辅助行走的第一天平均比非paferas组的虚弱患者早1天(3.52天vs 2.54天,p = 0.016)。体弱患者术后住院时间(LOS)由术前的14.29天显著降低至术后的10.64天(p = 0.011)。在辅助行走第1天和排便第1天,匹配AF组和NF/PF组之间无显著差异。AF组和NF/PF组在术后LOS、非家庭出院率、严重并发症发生率和轻微并发症发生率方面均无差异。结论:PAFERAS方案可显著改善ASD手术体弱患者的生理功能恢复和LOS。在对虚弱患者实施术前运动和营养优化后,虚弱患者的生理功能和LOS恢复过程与NF或PF患者相似。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of neurosurgery. Spine
Journal of neurosurgery. Spine 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
10.70%
发文量
396
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: Primarily publish original works in neurosurgery but also include studies in clinical neurophysiology, organic neurology, ophthalmology, radiology, pathology, and molecular biology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信