John Jairo Zuleta-Tobón, Juan Sebastián López-Martínez
{"title":"Cesarean and maternal mortality: Risk factor and indication bias.","authors":"John Jairo Zuleta-Tobón, Juan Sebastián López-Martínez","doi":"10.1002/ijgo.70119","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate the influence of cesarean section on maternal death and discern the effect of indication bias on this association.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective analysis of case series. All deaths confirmed by the official Epidemiological Surveillance Committee as maternal deaths and involving termination of pregnancy by cesarean section in Antioquia, Colombia, during the period 2011-2020 were included. Two researchers independently analyzed all the records, and, by consensus, classified the relationship as directly related, associated, and no association.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The maternal mortality rate for Antioquia was 40.7 deaths per 100 000 live births over the period studied, 48.6 per 100 000 cesarean sections, and 17.9 per 100 000 vaginal deliveries, a crude relative risk of cesarean of 2.7 (95% CI 2.1-3.7); 58.9% of deaths had no association, 13.5% were directly related, and 21.5% were associated with cesarean section. In 6.5% of cases, the association could not be assessed. There is an overlap between the maternal conditions and indications for cesarean section and the assessment of the association between death and cesarean section. Reasons for considering no association were that the underlying cause of death occurred after cesarean section (2), occurred in perimortem women (6), or occurred in women who were critically ill due to obstetric complications (2), underlying medical conditions (26), or pregnancy-related conditions (27).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>To control for indication bias, it is necessary to identify the influence of cesarean section on the chain of events leading to death in each case because there is no predictable and consistent pattern of indications for cesarean section that might also cause death.</p>","PeriodicalId":14164,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/ijgo.70119","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective: To evaluate the influence of cesarean section on maternal death and discern the effect of indication bias on this association.
Methods: A retrospective analysis of case series. All deaths confirmed by the official Epidemiological Surveillance Committee as maternal deaths and involving termination of pregnancy by cesarean section in Antioquia, Colombia, during the period 2011-2020 were included. Two researchers independently analyzed all the records, and, by consensus, classified the relationship as directly related, associated, and no association.
Results: The maternal mortality rate for Antioquia was 40.7 deaths per 100 000 live births over the period studied, 48.6 per 100 000 cesarean sections, and 17.9 per 100 000 vaginal deliveries, a crude relative risk of cesarean of 2.7 (95% CI 2.1-3.7); 58.9% of deaths had no association, 13.5% were directly related, and 21.5% were associated with cesarean section. In 6.5% of cases, the association could not be assessed. There is an overlap between the maternal conditions and indications for cesarean section and the assessment of the association between death and cesarean section. Reasons for considering no association were that the underlying cause of death occurred after cesarean section (2), occurred in perimortem women (6), or occurred in women who were critically ill due to obstetric complications (2), underlying medical conditions (26), or pregnancy-related conditions (27).
Conclusion: To control for indication bias, it is necessary to identify the influence of cesarean section on the chain of events leading to death in each case because there is no predictable and consistent pattern of indications for cesarean section that might also cause death.
目的:探讨剖宫产术对产妇死亡的影响及适应证偏倚对其相关性的影响。方法:回顾性分析病例序列。2011-2020年期间,在哥伦比亚安蒂奥基亚,经官方流行病学监测委员会确认为孕产妇死亡并涉及剖宫产终止妊娠的所有死亡均纳入统计。两名研究人员独立分析了所有的记录,并一致将这种关系分为直接相关、相关和无关联。结果:在研究期间,安蒂奥基亚的孕产妇死亡率为每10万例活产40.7例死亡,每10万例剖宫产48.6例死亡,每10万例阴道分娩17.9例死亡,剖宫产的粗相对风险为2.7 (95% CI 2.1-3.7);58.9%的死亡与剖宫产无关,13.5%的死亡与剖宫产直接相关,21.5%的死亡与剖宫产有关。在6.5%的病例中,相关性无法评估。产妇条件和剖宫产指征与死亡与剖宫产之间关系的评估之间存在重叠。认为无关联的原因是,潜在死亡原因发生在剖宫产术后(2),发生在死前妇女(6),或发生在因产科并发症(2)、潜在医疗条件(26)或妊娠相关条件(27)而病危的妇女中。结论:为了控制指征偏倚,有必要确定剖宫产对每个病例导致死亡的事件链的影响,因为剖宫产没有可预测和一致的可能导致死亡的指征模式。
期刊介绍:
The International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics publishes articles on all aspects of basic and clinical research in the fields of obstetrics and gynecology and related subjects, with emphasis on matters of worldwide interest.