Irma Hein, Maj Gigengack, Cedric Sachser, Ramón Lindauer
{"title":"Accuracy of the Pediatric Emotional Distress Scale - Early Screener to predict the risk for developing PTSD in young children after accidental injury.","authors":"Irma Hein, Maj Gigengack, Cedric Sachser, Ramón Lindauer","doi":"10.1080/20008066.2025.2494364","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Early identification of posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) in children is important to prevent chronic symptoms and long-term negative consequences. However, PTSD often goes unrecognized in the emergency setting of hospitals and screening methods for young children are lacking.</p><p><p>To evaluate the accuracy of an early screening tool for PTSD in a sample of young children (0-7 years) after unintentional injury.</p><p><p>The Pediatric Emotional Distress Scale - Early Screener (PEDS-ES) was administered to parents of children referred to the Emergency Department within 7 days post-accident (<i>n</i> = 82), and a validated interview for PTSD was administered 3 months after the accident as criterion measure: the Diagnostic Infant and Preschool Assessment (DIPA). Diagnostic accuracy of the PEDS-ES was inspected using area under the curve analyses including sensitivity, specificity, Positive and Negative Predictive Value.</p><p><p>After three months PTSD diagnosis was established in 21% of the children. Use of the PEDS-ES within 7 days after the injury showed fair accuracy with AUC = .727. Sensitivity (0.65) and specificity (0.73) for the suggested cutoff of 8 were moderate for predicting PTSD diagnosis 3 months after the injury. The examination of cutoff values that achieve enhanced sensitivity in a screening context - where sensitivity is prioritized - while maintaining a high level of specificity suggests that a lower cutoff of around 6 points may serve as a more sensitive (sensitivity: 0.82; specificity: 0.56) valid alternative cutoff score.</p><p><p>The PEDS-ES allows for successful early screening of risk for traumatic stress symptoms in young children after single accidental injury. It enables early identification of individuals who are at risk for developing PTSD and need further monitoring of symptoms, diagnostic assessment and treatment.</p>","PeriodicalId":12055,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Psychotraumatology","volume":"16 1","pages":"2494364"},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12057775/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Psychotraumatology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/20008066.2025.2494364","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/5/6 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Early identification of posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) in children is important to prevent chronic symptoms and long-term negative consequences. However, PTSD often goes unrecognized in the emergency setting of hospitals and screening methods for young children are lacking.
To evaluate the accuracy of an early screening tool for PTSD in a sample of young children (0-7 years) after unintentional injury.
The Pediatric Emotional Distress Scale - Early Screener (PEDS-ES) was administered to parents of children referred to the Emergency Department within 7 days post-accident (n = 82), and a validated interview for PTSD was administered 3 months after the accident as criterion measure: the Diagnostic Infant and Preschool Assessment (DIPA). Diagnostic accuracy of the PEDS-ES was inspected using area under the curve analyses including sensitivity, specificity, Positive and Negative Predictive Value.
After three months PTSD diagnosis was established in 21% of the children. Use of the PEDS-ES within 7 days after the injury showed fair accuracy with AUC = .727. Sensitivity (0.65) and specificity (0.73) for the suggested cutoff of 8 were moderate for predicting PTSD diagnosis 3 months after the injury. The examination of cutoff values that achieve enhanced sensitivity in a screening context - where sensitivity is prioritized - while maintaining a high level of specificity suggests that a lower cutoff of around 6 points may serve as a more sensitive (sensitivity: 0.82; specificity: 0.56) valid alternative cutoff score.
The PEDS-ES allows for successful early screening of risk for traumatic stress symptoms in young children after single accidental injury. It enables early identification of individuals who are at risk for developing PTSD and need further monitoring of symptoms, diagnostic assessment and treatment.
期刊介绍:
The European Journal of Psychotraumatology (EJPT) is a peer-reviewed open access interdisciplinary journal owned by the European Society of Traumatic Stress Studies (ESTSS). The European Journal of Psychotraumatology (EJPT) aims to engage scholars, clinicians and researchers in the vital issues of how to understand, prevent and treat the consequences of stress and trauma, including but not limited to, posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD), depressive disorders, substance abuse, burnout, and neurobiological or physical consequences, using the latest research or clinical experience in these areas. The journal shares ESTSS’ mission to advance and disseminate scientific knowledge about traumatic stress. Papers may address individual events, repeated or chronic (complex) trauma, large scale disasters, or violence. Being open access, the European Journal of Psychotraumatology is also evidence of ESTSS’ stand on free accessibility of research publications to a wider community via the web. The European Journal of Psychotraumatology seeks to attract contributions from academics and practitioners from diverse professional backgrounds, including, but not restricted to, those in mental health, social sciences, and health and welfare services. Contributions from outside Europe are welcome. The journal welcomes original basic and clinical research articles that consolidate and expand the theoretical and professional basis of the field of traumatic stress; Review articles including meta-analyses; short communications presenting new ideas or early-stage promising research; study protocols that describe proposed or ongoing research; case reports examining a single individual or event in a real‑life context; clinical practice papers sharing experience from the clinic; letters to the Editor debating articles already published in the Journal; inaugural Lectures; conference abstracts and book reviews. Both quantitative and qualitative research is welcome.