Second Examination of the Right Colon Using Narrow-Band Imaging Increases Adenoma Detection Rates in the Right Colon: A Multicenter, Randomized Controlled Trial.

IF 3.7 3区 医学 Q2 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
Shin Hee Kim, One Zoong Kim, In Kyung Yoo, Jae Yong Park, Young Joo Yang, Jin Hwa Park, Sang Pyo Lee, Jae Gon Lee
{"title":"Second Examination of the Right Colon Using Narrow-Band Imaging Increases Adenoma Detection Rates in the Right Colon: A Multicenter, Randomized Controlled Trial.","authors":"Shin Hee Kim, One Zoong Kim, In Kyung Yoo, Jae Yong Park, Young Joo Yang, Jin Hwa Park, Sang Pyo Lee, Jae Gon Lee","doi":"10.1111/jgh.16964","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background/aims: </strong>Repeat examination of the right colon increases adenoma detection rates (ADRs) in the right colon. This study aimed to investigate whether a second examination of the right colon using narrow-band imaging (NBI) increases ADRs in the right colon compared with repeat examinations using white light imaging (WLI).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Consecutive patients with routine indications for colonoscopy were enrolled and randomly assigned to two groups. The control arm underwent two repeat forward examinations of the right colon using WLI only (repeat-WLI group), and the intervention arm underwent the first examination of the right colon using WLI and the second examination using NBI (WLI-NBI group). Lesions detected during the first and second examinations in each group were analyzed. The primary outcome was ADR in the right colon.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 476 colonoscopies were analyzed, including 240 and 236 in the repeat-WLI and WLI-NBI groups, respectively. The overall ADR in the right colon was significantly higher in the WLI-NBI group than that in the repeat-WLI group (27.1% vs. 17.9%; p = 0.022). The number of adenomas per colonoscopy in the right colon was also significantly higher in the WLI-NBI group than in the repeat-WLI group (mean number of adenomas, 0.36 vs. 0.24; p = 0.042). However, there were no significant differences in the detection rates of advanced adenomas and sessile serrated lesions between the WLI-NBI and repeat-WLI groups (advanced adenoma, 4.7% vs. 2.9%; sessile serrated lesion, 2.5% vs. 3.3%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>A second forward examination of the right colon using NBI increased ADRs in the right colon.</p>","PeriodicalId":15877,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/jgh.16964","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background/aims: Repeat examination of the right colon increases adenoma detection rates (ADRs) in the right colon. This study aimed to investigate whether a second examination of the right colon using narrow-band imaging (NBI) increases ADRs in the right colon compared with repeat examinations using white light imaging (WLI).

Methods: Consecutive patients with routine indications for colonoscopy were enrolled and randomly assigned to two groups. The control arm underwent two repeat forward examinations of the right colon using WLI only (repeat-WLI group), and the intervention arm underwent the first examination of the right colon using WLI and the second examination using NBI (WLI-NBI group). Lesions detected during the first and second examinations in each group were analyzed. The primary outcome was ADR in the right colon.

Results: A total of 476 colonoscopies were analyzed, including 240 and 236 in the repeat-WLI and WLI-NBI groups, respectively. The overall ADR in the right colon was significantly higher in the WLI-NBI group than that in the repeat-WLI group (27.1% vs. 17.9%; p = 0.022). The number of adenomas per colonoscopy in the right colon was also significantly higher in the WLI-NBI group than in the repeat-WLI group (mean number of adenomas, 0.36 vs. 0.24; p = 0.042). However, there were no significant differences in the detection rates of advanced adenomas and sessile serrated lesions between the WLI-NBI and repeat-WLI groups (advanced adenoma, 4.7% vs. 2.9%; sessile serrated lesion, 2.5% vs. 3.3%).

Conclusion: A second forward examination of the right colon using NBI increased ADRs in the right colon.

右结肠二次检查窄带成像增加右结肠腺瘤检出率:一项多中心随机对照试验
背景/目的:重复检查右结肠可增加右结肠腺瘤的检出率。本研究旨在探讨与使用白光成像(WLI)重复检查相比,使用窄带成像(NBI)对右结肠进行第二次检查是否会增加右结肠的不良反应。方法:连续纳入符合常规结肠镜检查指征的患者,随机分为两组。对照组仅使用WLI对右结肠进行两次重复正向检查(repeat-WLI组),干预组使用WLI对右结肠进行第一次检查,使用NBI进行第二次检查(WLI-NBI组)。分析各组第一次和第二次检查中发现的病变。主要结果是右结肠的不良反应。结果:共分析476例结肠镜检查,其中repeat-WLI组240例,WLI-NBI组236例。WLI-NBI组右结肠总不良反应显著高于重复- wli组(27.1% vs. 17.9%;p = 0.022)。WLI-NBI组每次结肠镜检查右结肠腺瘤数量也显著高于重复wli组(平均腺瘤数量,0.36 vs 0.24;p = 0.042)。然而,在WLI-NBI组和重复wli组之间,晚期腺瘤和无底锯齿状病变的检出率没有显著差异(晚期腺瘤,4.7% vs. 2.9%;无柄锯齿状病变(2.5% vs. 3.3%)。结论:使用NBI对右结肠进行第二次前诊会增加右结肠的不良反应。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.90
自引率
2.40%
发文量
326
审稿时长
2.3 months
期刊介绍: Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology is produced 12 times per year and publishes peer-reviewed original papers, reviews and editorials concerned with clinical practice and research in the fields of hepatology, gastroenterology and endoscopy. Papers cover the medical, radiological, pathological, biochemical, physiological and historical aspects of the subject areas. All submitted papers are reviewed by at least two referees expert in the field of the submitted paper.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信