Performance of the GALAD Model in an Asian Cohort Undergoing Hepatocellular Carcinoma Surveillance: A Prospective Cohort Study.

IF 3.7 3区 医学 Q2 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
Wei-Lun Liou, Si-Yu Tan, Hiroyuki Yamada, Thinesh Krishnamoorthy, Jason Pik-Eu Chang, Chin-Pin Yeo, Chee-Kiat Tan
{"title":"Performance of the GALAD Model in an Asian Cohort Undergoing Hepatocellular Carcinoma Surveillance: A Prospective Cohort Study.","authors":"Wei-Lun Liou, Si-Yu Tan, Hiroyuki Yamada, Thinesh Krishnamoorthy, Jason Pik-Eu Chang, Chin-Pin Yeo, Chee-Kiat Tan","doi":"10.1111/jgh.16997","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and aim: </strong>Current hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) surveillance strategy has its limitations, consequently delaying early detection. The GALAD model has been validated in retrospective studies, with two published cut-off values yielding different sensitivities for HCCs of different etiologies. We evaluated the performance of GALAD model in HCC surveillance and determined the ideal cut-off value for our cohort.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients undergoing 6-monthly HCC surveillance in Singapore General Hospital were recruited between December 2017-October 2018. Study serum specimens were prospectively collected and retrospectively tested using the μTASWako alpha-fetoprotein (AFP), AFP-L3, and protein induced by vitamin K antagonism-II (PIVKA-II) kits. GALAD score was calculated and compared with individual biomarkers using area under the curve (AUC) analysis. Published GALAD cut-offs of -0.63 and -1.95 were compared for their performance in HCC detection.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were 207 patients (median age 59 years, 55.1% males). Hepatitis B was the commonest etiology (72.9%). By February 2023, with a median follow-up of 48.9 months, 20 patients had developed HCC. Eight patients developed HCC within 1 year from specimen collection. For HCC developing within 1 year, GALAD model detected HCC with an AUC of 0.84, greater than AFP (AUC 0.77), AFP-L3 (AUC 0.60), and PIVKA-II (AUC 0.67). GALAD at cut-off -1.95 achieved sensitivity and specificity of 75% and 92.5% for HCCs detected within 1 year, superior to cut-off -0.63 (sensitivity 12.5%, specificity 100%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In this prospective study of HCC surveillance, the GALAD model performed better than individual biomarkers. The cut-off of -1.95 was more useful in our predominantly chronic hepatitis B cohort.</p>","PeriodicalId":15877,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/jgh.16997","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and aim: Current hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) surveillance strategy has its limitations, consequently delaying early detection. The GALAD model has been validated in retrospective studies, with two published cut-off values yielding different sensitivities for HCCs of different etiologies. We evaluated the performance of GALAD model in HCC surveillance and determined the ideal cut-off value for our cohort.

Methods: Patients undergoing 6-monthly HCC surveillance in Singapore General Hospital were recruited between December 2017-October 2018. Study serum specimens were prospectively collected and retrospectively tested using the μTASWako alpha-fetoprotein (AFP), AFP-L3, and protein induced by vitamin K antagonism-II (PIVKA-II) kits. GALAD score was calculated and compared with individual biomarkers using area under the curve (AUC) analysis. Published GALAD cut-offs of -0.63 and -1.95 were compared for their performance in HCC detection.

Results: There were 207 patients (median age 59 years, 55.1% males). Hepatitis B was the commonest etiology (72.9%). By February 2023, with a median follow-up of 48.9 months, 20 patients had developed HCC. Eight patients developed HCC within 1 year from specimen collection. For HCC developing within 1 year, GALAD model detected HCC with an AUC of 0.84, greater than AFP (AUC 0.77), AFP-L3 (AUC 0.60), and PIVKA-II (AUC 0.67). GALAD at cut-off -1.95 achieved sensitivity and specificity of 75% and 92.5% for HCCs detected within 1 year, superior to cut-off -0.63 (sensitivity 12.5%, specificity 100%).

Conclusion: In this prospective study of HCC surveillance, the GALAD model performed better than individual biomarkers. The cut-off of -1.95 was more useful in our predominantly chronic hepatitis B cohort.

GALAD模型在接受肝细胞癌监测的亚洲队列中的表现:一项前瞻性队列研究。
背景与目的:当前的肝细胞癌(HCC)监测策略有其局限性,因此延迟了早期发现。GALAD模型已在回顾性研究中得到验证,两个已发表的临界值对不同病因的hcc产生了不同的敏感性。我们评估了GALAD模型在HCC监测中的性能,并确定了我们队列的理想临界值。方法:招募2017年12月至2018年10月在新加坡总医院接受6个月HCC监测的患者。采用μTASWako α -胎蛋白(AFP)、AFP- l3和维生素K拮抗- ii (PIVKA-II)试剂盒对研究血清标本进行前瞻性和回顾性检测。计算GALAD评分,并使用曲线下面积(AUC)分析与个体生物标志物进行比较。公布的GALAD截止值为-0.63和-1.95,比较了它们在HCC检测中的表现。结果:患者207例,中位年龄59岁,男性55.1%。乙型肝炎是最常见的病因(72.9%)。截至2023年2月,中位随访48.9个月,20例患者发生HCC。8例患者在标本采集后1年内发生HCC。对于1年内发生的HCC, GALAD模型的AUC为0.84,高于AFP (AUC 0.77)、AFP- l3 (AUC 0.60)和PIVKA-II (AUC 0.67)。GALAD的截止值为-1.95,对1年内检测到的hcc的敏感性和特异性分别为75%和92.5%,优于截止值-0.63(敏感性12.5%,特异性100%)。结论:在这项HCC监测的前瞻性研究中,GALAD模型比个体生物标志物表现更好。在以慢性乙型肝炎为主的队列中,-1.95的临界值更为有用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.90
自引率
2.40%
发文量
326
审稿时长
2.3 months
期刊介绍: Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology is produced 12 times per year and publishes peer-reviewed original papers, reviews and editorials concerned with clinical practice and research in the fields of hepatology, gastroenterology and endoscopy. Papers cover the medical, radiological, pathological, biochemical, physiological and historical aspects of the subject areas. All submitted papers are reviewed by at least two referees expert in the field of the submitted paper.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信