Accelerated Epithelium-off Corneal Cross-linking With Preservation of a Central Epithelial Island in the Management of Paracentral Progressive Keratoconus: A Comparative Clinical Trial.
Ahmad S Khalil, Marwa A M Khedr, Ahmed A M Gad, Ali Goda Ali
{"title":"Accelerated Epithelium-off Corneal Cross-linking With Preservation of a Central Epithelial Island in the Management of Paracentral Progressive Keratoconus: A Comparative Clinical Trial.","authors":"Ahmad S Khalil, Marwa A M Khedr, Ahmed A M Gad, Ali Goda Ali","doi":"10.3928/1081597X-20250409-01","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To evaluate the efficacy and safety of accelerated corneal cross-linking (A-CXL) while preserving the epithelium over the central 3 mm of the cornea compared to epithelium removal CXL in cases of paracentral keratoconus.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this prospective comparative study, 140 eyes of 77 patients were randomized to receive either A-CXL with preservation of the central 3 mm of corneal epithelium or A-CXL with removal of whole corneal epithelium over a central disk area with a diameter of 9 mm. Patients were observed regularly for 1 year after the procedure. The primary outcome measures were to compare early uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA) and corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA), corneal haze, pain, and discomfort in the first week between the two groups. The secondary outcome measure was keratoconus progression after 12 months of follow-up, measured by the maximum keratometry (Kmax) value.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A significant difference was found between the two groups regarding early postoperative CDVA, corneal haze, pain, and discomfort, with more favorable results in the ACXL with preservation of the central 3 mm of corneal epithelium group. At 12 months of follow-up, a significant improvement in UDVA, CDVA, and Kmax was noticed among patients of the same group, with better final vision and a reduction in Kmax as compared to the preoperative values.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Preserving the epithelium over the central 3 mm of the cornea during A-CXL in cases with paracentral keratoconus can provide the benefits of immediate early postoperative visual rehabilitation, less corneal haze, less pain, good efficacy, and prevention of keratoconus progression. <b>[<i>J Refract Surg</i>. 2025;41(5):e492-e500.]</b>.</p>","PeriodicalId":16951,"journal":{"name":"Journal of refractive surgery","volume":"41 5","pages":"e492-e500"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of refractive surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3928/1081597X-20250409-01","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Purpose: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of accelerated corneal cross-linking (A-CXL) while preserving the epithelium over the central 3 mm of the cornea compared to epithelium removal CXL in cases of paracentral keratoconus.
Methods: In this prospective comparative study, 140 eyes of 77 patients were randomized to receive either A-CXL with preservation of the central 3 mm of corneal epithelium or A-CXL with removal of whole corneal epithelium over a central disk area with a diameter of 9 mm. Patients were observed regularly for 1 year after the procedure. The primary outcome measures were to compare early uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA) and corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA), corneal haze, pain, and discomfort in the first week between the two groups. The secondary outcome measure was keratoconus progression after 12 months of follow-up, measured by the maximum keratometry (Kmax) value.
Results: A significant difference was found between the two groups regarding early postoperative CDVA, corneal haze, pain, and discomfort, with more favorable results in the ACXL with preservation of the central 3 mm of corneal epithelium group. At 12 months of follow-up, a significant improvement in UDVA, CDVA, and Kmax was noticed among patients of the same group, with better final vision and a reduction in Kmax as compared to the preoperative values.
Conclusions: Preserving the epithelium over the central 3 mm of the cornea during A-CXL in cases with paracentral keratoconus can provide the benefits of immediate early postoperative visual rehabilitation, less corneal haze, less pain, good efficacy, and prevention of keratoconus progression. [J Refract Surg. 2025;41(5):e492-e500.].
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Refractive Surgery, the official journal of the International Society of Refractive Surgery, a partner of the American Academy of Ophthalmology, has been a monthly peer-reviewed forum for original research, review, and evaluation of refractive and lens-based surgical procedures for more than 30 years. Practical, clinically valuable articles provide readers with the most up-to-date information regarding advances in the field of refractive surgery. Begin to explore the Journal and all of its great benefits such as:
• Columns including “Translational Science,” “Surgical Techniques,” and “Biomechanics”
• Supplemental videos and materials available for many articles
• Access to current articles, as well as several years of archived content
• Articles posted online just 2 months after acceptance.