Accelerated Epithelium-off Corneal Cross-linking With Preservation of a Central Epithelial Island in the Management of Paracentral Progressive Keratoconus: A Comparative Clinical Trial.

IF 2.9 3区 医学 Q1 OPHTHALMOLOGY
Ahmad S Khalil, Marwa A M Khedr, Ahmed A M Gad, Ali Goda Ali
{"title":"Accelerated Epithelium-off Corneal Cross-linking With Preservation of a Central Epithelial Island in the Management of Paracentral Progressive Keratoconus: A Comparative Clinical Trial.","authors":"Ahmad S Khalil, Marwa A M Khedr, Ahmed A M Gad, Ali Goda Ali","doi":"10.3928/1081597X-20250409-01","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To evaluate the efficacy and safety of accelerated corneal cross-linking (A-CXL) while preserving the epithelium over the central 3 mm of the cornea compared to epithelium removal CXL in cases of paracentral keratoconus.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this prospective comparative study, 140 eyes of 77 patients were randomized to receive either A-CXL with preservation of the central 3 mm of corneal epithelium or A-CXL with removal of whole corneal epithelium over a central disk area with a diameter of 9 mm. Patients were observed regularly for 1 year after the procedure. The primary outcome measures were to compare early uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA) and corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA), corneal haze, pain, and discomfort in the first week between the two groups. The secondary outcome measure was keratoconus progression after 12 months of follow-up, measured by the maximum keratometry (Kmax) value.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A significant difference was found between the two groups regarding early postoperative CDVA, corneal haze, pain, and discomfort, with more favorable results in the ACXL with preservation of the central 3 mm of corneal epithelium group. At 12 months of follow-up, a significant improvement in UDVA, CDVA, and Kmax was noticed among patients of the same group, with better final vision and a reduction in Kmax as compared to the preoperative values.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Preserving the epithelium over the central 3 mm of the cornea during A-CXL in cases with paracentral keratoconus can provide the benefits of immediate early postoperative visual rehabilitation, less corneal haze, less pain, good efficacy, and prevention of keratoconus progression. <b>[<i>J Refract Surg</i>. 2025;41(5):e492-e500.]</b>.</p>","PeriodicalId":16951,"journal":{"name":"Journal of refractive surgery","volume":"41 5","pages":"e492-e500"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of refractive surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3928/1081597X-20250409-01","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of accelerated corneal cross-linking (A-CXL) while preserving the epithelium over the central 3 mm of the cornea compared to epithelium removal CXL in cases of paracentral keratoconus.

Methods: In this prospective comparative study, 140 eyes of 77 patients were randomized to receive either A-CXL with preservation of the central 3 mm of corneal epithelium or A-CXL with removal of whole corneal epithelium over a central disk area with a diameter of 9 mm. Patients were observed regularly for 1 year after the procedure. The primary outcome measures were to compare early uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA) and corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA), corneal haze, pain, and discomfort in the first week between the two groups. The secondary outcome measure was keratoconus progression after 12 months of follow-up, measured by the maximum keratometry (Kmax) value.

Results: A significant difference was found between the two groups regarding early postoperative CDVA, corneal haze, pain, and discomfort, with more favorable results in the ACXL with preservation of the central 3 mm of corneal epithelium group. At 12 months of follow-up, a significant improvement in UDVA, CDVA, and Kmax was noticed among patients of the same group, with better final vision and a reduction in Kmax as compared to the preoperative values.

Conclusions: Preserving the epithelium over the central 3 mm of the cornea during A-CXL in cases with paracentral keratoconus can provide the benefits of immediate early postoperative visual rehabilitation, less corneal haze, less pain, good efficacy, and prevention of keratoconus progression. [J Refract Surg. 2025;41(5):e492-e500.].

加速上皮离体交联与保存中央上皮岛治疗中心旁进展性圆锥角膜:一项比较临床试验。
目的:评价加速角膜交联(A-CXL)在保留角膜中央3mm以上上皮的情况下与上皮去除CXL在中心旁圆锥角膜病例中的疗效和安全性。方法:在这项前瞻性比较研究中,77例患者140只眼随机接受保留中心3mm角膜上皮的a - cxl或直径为9mm的中心盘区切除整个角膜上皮的a - cxl。术后定期观察患者1年。主要观察指标是比较两组患者的早期未矫正距离视力(UDVA)和矫正距离视力(CDVA)、角膜混浊、疼痛和第一周的不适。次要指标是随访12个月后圆锥角膜的进展情况,以最大角膜密度(Kmax)值测量。结果:两组术后早期CDVA、角膜混浊、疼痛、不适均有显著差异,ACXL保留角膜中心3mm上皮组效果更佳。在12个月的随访中,同一组患者的UDVA、CDVA和Kmax均有显著改善,与术前相比,最终视力更好,Kmax降低。结论:中央旁圆锥角膜A-CXL术中保留角膜中央3mm以上的上皮,术后早期视力恢复迅速,角膜混浊少,疼痛少,疗效好,可预防圆锥角膜进展。[J].中华眼科杂志,2015;41(5):992 - 995。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
12.50%
发文量
160
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Refractive Surgery, the official journal of the International Society of Refractive Surgery, a partner of the American Academy of Ophthalmology, has been a monthly peer-reviewed forum for original research, review, and evaluation of refractive and lens-based surgical procedures for more than 30 years. Practical, clinically valuable articles provide readers with the most up-to-date information regarding advances in the field of refractive surgery. Begin to explore the Journal and all of its great benefits such as: • Columns including “Translational Science,” “Surgical Techniques,” and “Biomechanics” • Supplemental videos and materials available for many articles • Access to current articles, as well as several years of archived content • Articles posted online just 2 months after acceptance.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信