Construction of a risk prediction model for postoperative cognitive dysfunction in colorectal cancer patients.

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q3 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
Zhen-Ping Zheng, Yong-Guo Zhang, Ming-Bo Long, Kui-Quan Ji, Jin-Yan Peng, Kai He
{"title":"Construction of a risk prediction model for postoperative cognitive dysfunction in colorectal cancer patients.","authors":"Zhen-Ping Zheng, Yong-Guo Zhang, Ming-Bo Long, Kui-Quan Ji, Jin-Yan Peng, Kai He","doi":"10.4240/wjgs.v17.i4.104459","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Colorectal cancer (CRC) is one of the most prevalent and lethal malignant tumors worldwide. Currently, surgical intervention was the primary treatment modality for CRC. However, increasing studies have revealed that CRC patients may experience postoperative cognitive dysfunction (POCD).</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To establish a risk prediction model for POCD in CRC patients and investigate the preventive value of dexmedetomidine (DEX).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective analysis was conducted on clinical data from 140 CRC patients who underwent surgery at the People's Hospital of Qian Nan from February 2020 to May 2024. Patients were allocated into a modeling group (<i>n</i> = 98) and a validation group (<i>n</i> = 42) in a 7:3 ratio. General clinical data were collected. Additionally, in the modeling group, patients who received DEX preoperatively were incorporated into the observation group (<i>n</i> = 54), while those who did not were placed in the control group (<i>n</i> = 44). The incidence of POCD was recorded for both cohorts. Data analysis was performed using statistical product and service solutions 20.0, with <i>t</i>-tests or <i>χ</i> <sup>2</sup> tests employed for group comparisons based on the data type. Least absolute shrinkage and selection operator regression was applied to identify influencing factors and reduce the impact of multicollinear predictors among variables. Multivariate analysis was carried out using Logistic regression. Based on the identified risk factors, a risk prediction model for POCD in CRC patients was developed, and the predictive value of these risk factors was evaluated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Significant differences were observed between the cognitive dysfunction group and the non-cognitive dysfunction group in diabetes status, alcohol consumption, years of education, anesthesia duration, intraoperative blood loss, intraoperative hypoxemia, use of DEX during surgery, intraoperative use of vasoactive drugs, surgical time, systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS) score (<i>P</i> < 0.05). Multivariate Logistic regression analysis identified that diabetes [odds ratio (OR) = 4.679, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.382-15.833], alcohol consumption (OR = 5.058, 95%CI: 1.255-20.380), intraoperative hypoxemia (OR = 4.697, 95%CI: 1.380-15.991), no use of DEX during surgery (OR = 3.931, 95%CI: 1.383-11.175), surgery duration ≥ 90 minutes (OR = 4.894, 95%CI: 1.377-17.394), and a SIRS score ≥ 3 (OR = 4.133, 95%CI: 1.323-12.907) were independent risk factors for POCD in CRC patients (<i>P</i> < 0.05). A risk prediction model for POCD was constructed using diabetes, alcohol consumption, intraoperative hypoxemia, non-use of DEX during surgery, surgery duration, and SIRS score as factors. A receiver operator characteristic curve analysis of these factors revealed the model's predictive sensitivity (88.56%), specificity (70.64%), and area under the curve (AUC) (AUC = 0.852, 95%CI: 0.773-0.919). The model was validated using 42 CRC patients who met the inclusion criteria, demonstrating sensitivity (80.77%), specificity (81.25%), and accuracy (80.95%), and AUC (0.805) in diagnosing cognitive impairment, with a 95%CI: 0.635-0.896.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Logistic regression analysis identified that diabetes, alcohol consumption, intraoperative hypoxemia, non-use of DEX during surgery, surgery duration, and SIRS score vigorously influenced the occurrence of POCD. The risk prediction model based on these factors demonstrated good predictive performance for POCD in CRC individuals. This study offers valuable insights for clinical practice and contributes to the prevention and management of POCD under CRC circumstances.</p>","PeriodicalId":23759,"journal":{"name":"World Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery","volume":"17 4","pages":"104459"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12019063/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"World Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4240/wjgs.v17.i4.104459","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Colorectal cancer (CRC) is one of the most prevalent and lethal malignant tumors worldwide. Currently, surgical intervention was the primary treatment modality for CRC. However, increasing studies have revealed that CRC patients may experience postoperative cognitive dysfunction (POCD).

Aim: To establish a risk prediction model for POCD in CRC patients and investigate the preventive value of dexmedetomidine (DEX).

Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted on clinical data from 140 CRC patients who underwent surgery at the People's Hospital of Qian Nan from February 2020 to May 2024. Patients were allocated into a modeling group (n = 98) and a validation group (n = 42) in a 7:3 ratio. General clinical data were collected. Additionally, in the modeling group, patients who received DEX preoperatively were incorporated into the observation group (n = 54), while those who did not were placed in the control group (n = 44). The incidence of POCD was recorded for both cohorts. Data analysis was performed using statistical product and service solutions 20.0, with t-tests or χ 2 tests employed for group comparisons based on the data type. Least absolute shrinkage and selection operator regression was applied to identify influencing factors and reduce the impact of multicollinear predictors among variables. Multivariate analysis was carried out using Logistic regression. Based on the identified risk factors, a risk prediction model for POCD in CRC patients was developed, and the predictive value of these risk factors was evaluated.

Results: Significant differences were observed between the cognitive dysfunction group and the non-cognitive dysfunction group in diabetes status, alcohol consumption, years of education, anesthesia duration, intraoperative blood loss, intraoperative hypoxemia, use of DEX during surgery, intraoperative use of vasoactive drugs, surgical time, systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS) score (P < 0.05). Multivariate Logistic regression analysis identified that diabetes [odds ratio (OR) = 4.679, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.382-15.833], alcohol consumption (OR = 5.058, 95%CI: 1.255-20.380), intraoperative hypoxemia (OR = 4.697, 95%CI: 1.380-15.991), no use of DEX during surgery (OR = 3.931, 95%CI: 1.383-11.175), surgery duration ≥ 90 minutes (OR = 4.894, 95%CI: 1.377-17.394), and a SIRS score ≥ 3 (OR = 4.133, 95%CI: 1.323-12.907) were independent risk factors for POCD in CRC patients (P < 0.05). A risk prediction model for POCD was constructed using diabetes, alcohol consumption, intraoperative hypoxemia, non-use of DEX during surgery, surgery duration, and SIRS score as factors. A receiver operator characteristic curve analysis of these factors revealed the model's predictive sensitivity (88.56%), specificity (70.64%), and area under the curve (AUC) (AUC = 0.852, 95%CI: 0.773-0.919). The model was validated using 42 CRC patients who met the inclusion criteria, demonstrating sensitivity (80.77%), specificity (81.25%), and accuracy (80.95%), and AUC (0.805) in diagnosing cognitive impairment, with a 95%CI: 0.635-0.896.

Conclusion: Logistic regression analysis identified that diabetes, alcohol consumption, intraoperative hypoxemia, non-use of DEX during surgery, surgery duration, and SIRS score vigorously influenced the occurrence of POCD. The risk prediction model based on these factors demonstrated good predictive performance for POCD in CRC individuals. This study offers valuable insights for clinical practice and contributes to the prevention and management of POCD under CRC circumstances.

结直肠癌患者术后认知功能障碍风险预测模型的建立
背景:结直肠癌(Colorectal cancer, CRC)是世界范围内最常见、最致命的恶性肿瘤之一。目前,手术干预是结直肠癌的主要治疗方式。然而,越来越多的研究表明,结直肠癌患者可能会出现术后认知功能障碍(POCD)。目的:建立结直肠癌患者POCD的风险预测模型,探讨右美托咪定(DEX)的预防价值。方法:回顾性分析2020年2月至2024年5月在黔南市人民医院行手术治疗的140例结直肠癌患者的临床资料。将患者按7:3的比例分为建模组(n = 98)和验证组(n = 42)。收集一般临床资料。在建模组中,将术前接受DEX治疗的患者纳入观察组(n = 54),未接受DEX治疗的患者纳入对照组(n = 44)。记录两组患者的POCD发生率。使用统计产品和服务解决方案20.0进行数据分析,根据数据类型采用t检验或χ 2检验进行分组比较。采用最小绝对收缩和选择算子回归识别影响因素,减少变量间多重共线性预测因子的影响。采用Logistic回归进行多因素分析。基于识别出的危险因素,建立结直肠癌患者POCD的风险预测模型,并对这些危险因素的预测价值进行评价。结果:认知功能障碍组与非认知功能障碍组在糖尿病状况、饮酒量、受教育年限、麻醉时间、术中出血量、术中低氧血症、术中去氧苄啶的使用、术中血管活性药物的使用、手术时间、全身炎症反应综合征(SIRS)评分方面差异均有统计学意义(P < 0.05)。多因素Logistic回归分析发现,糖尿病[优势比(OR) = 4.679, 95%可信区间(CI) = 1.382 ~ 15.833]、饮酒(OR = 5.058, 95%CI: 1.155 ~ 20.380)、术中低氧血症(OR = 4.697, 95%CI: 1.380 ~ 15.991)、术中未使用DEX (OR = 3.931, 95%CI: 1.383 ~ 11.175)、手术持续时间≥90分钟(OR = 4.894, 95%CI: 1.377 ~ 17.394)、SIRS评分≥3 (OR = 4.133, 95%CI:1.323 ~ 12.907)是结直肠癌患者POCD的独立危险因素(P < 0.05)。以糖尿病、饮酒、术中低氧血症、术中未使用DEX、手术时间、SIRS评分为因素构建POCD风险预测模型。对这些因素进行特征曲线分析,结果表明该模型的预测灵敏度为88.56%,特异性为70.64%,曲线下面积(AUC)为0.852,95%CI为0.773 ~ 0.919。采用42例符合纳入标准的结直肠癌患者对模型进行验证,在诊断认知障碍方面表现出敏感性(80.77%)、特异性(81.25%)、准确性(80.95%)和AUC (0.805), 95%CI: 0.635-0.896。结论:Logistic回归分析发现糖尿病、饮酒、术中低氧血症、术中未使用DEX、手术时间、SIRS评分对POCD的发生有显著影响。基于这些因素的风险预测模型对结直肠癌个体的POCD具有良好的预测效果。本研究为临床实践提供了有价值的见解,有助于CRC下POCD的预防和管理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
5.00%
发文量
111
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信