Patterns of Physical Restraints and Their Associated Factors Among Personal Care Assistants Working at Daycare Centers in Korea.

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q3 GERONTOLOGY
Song-Iee Hong, Haenim Lee, So Youn Chung
{"title":"Patterns of Physical Restraints and Their Associated Factors Among Personal Care Assistants Working at Daycare Centers in Korea.","authors":"Song-Iee Hong, Haenim Lee, So Youn Chung","doi":"10.1080/01634372.2025.2491549","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In South Korea, the use of physical restraints (PR) in long-term care for older adults are generally prohibited due to their link to elder abuse. This study analyzed data from the 2017 National Survey on Human Rights for Older Adults (<i>N</i> = 4,447), focusing on personal care assistants (PCAs) in daycare settings. The study explored the prevalence and patterns of PR use among PCAs, using Latent Class Analysis (LCA) to identify four distinct groups based on attitudes and behaviors toward PR: High-risk Group, Semi-aware Low Usage Group, Unaware Low Usage Group, Desired Group. The study revealed a significant gap between PCAs' attitudes toward PR and their actual practices. Notably, High-risk Group tended to attribute elder abuse to personality disorders in older adults. In contrast, the desired group linked elder abuse to caregivers' personality disorders. These findings highlight the need for standardized, human rights-focused education.</p>","PeriodicalId":47579,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Gerontological Social Work","volume":" ","pages":"1-25"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Gerontological Social Work","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/01634372.2025.2491549","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In South Korea, the use of physical restraints (PR) in long-term care for older adults are generally prohibited due to their link to elder abuse. This study analyzed data from the 2017 National Survey on Human Rights for Older Adults (N = 4,447), focusing on personal care assistants (PCAs) in daycare settings. The study explored the prevalence and patterns of PR use among PCAs, using Latent Class Analysis (LCA) to identify four distinct groups based on attitudes and behaviors toward PR: High-risk Group, Semi-aware Low Usage Group, Unaware Low Usage Group, Desired Group. The study revealed a significant gap between PCAs' attitudes toward PR and their actual practices. Notably, High-risk Group tended to attribute elder abuse to personality disorders in older adults. In contrast, the desired group linked elder abuse to caregivers' personality disorders. These findings highlight the need for standardized, human rights-focused education.

韩国日托中心个人护理助理的身体约束模式及其相关因素
在韩国,由于与虐待老年人有关,一般禁止在老年人长期护理中使用身体约束。本研究分析了2017年全国老年人人权调查(N = 4,447)的数据,重点关注日托机构中的个人护理助理(pca)。本研究通过潜类分析(Latent Class Analysis, LCA)的方法,根据对PR的态度和行为划分出四个不同的群体:高危组、半意识低使用率组、不意识低使用率组、期望组。该研究揭示了cpa对公共关系的态度与他们的实际行为之间的显著差距。值得注意的是,高风险群体倾向于将虐待老年人归因于老年人的人格障碍。相比之下,期望组将虐待老人与照顾者的人格障碍联系起来。这些发现凸显了标准化、注重人权的教育的必要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
3.10%
发文量
65
期刊介绍: With over 30 years of consistent, quality articles devoted to social work practice, theory, administration, and consultation in the field of aging, the Journal of Gerontological Social Work offers you the information you need to stay abreast of the changing and controversial issues of today"s growing aging population. A valuable resource for social work administrators, practitioners, consultants, and supervisors in long-term care facilities, acute treatment and psychiatric hospitals, mental health centers, family service agencies, community and senior citizen centers, and public health and welfare agencies, JGSW provides a respected and stable forum for cutting-edge insights by experts in the field.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信