Comparison Between Low-Dose Esketamine and Dexmedetomidine on Postoperative Recovery Quality Among Patients Undergoing Humeral Trauma Surgery in Interscalene Brachial Plexus Block: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Controlled Trial.

IF 4.7 2区 医学 Q1 CHEMISTRY, MEDICINAL
Drug Design, Development and Therapy Pub Date : 2025-05-05 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.2147/DDDT.S507427
Jiao Chen, Yu Qi, Jun Zhang, Bin Sun, Meng Zhang, Xiangdi Meng, Meiyan Zhou, Liwei Wang
{"title":"Comparison Between Low-Dose Esketamine and Dexmedetomidine on Postoperative Recovery Quality Among Patients Undergoing Humeral Trauma Surgery in Interscalene Brachial Plexus Block: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Controlled Trial.","authors":"Jiao Chen, Yu Qi, Jun Zhang, Bin Sun, Meng Zhang, Xiangdi Meng, Meiyan Zhou, Liwei Wang","doi":"10.2147/DDDT.S507427","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Patients with humeral fracture often suffer from post-traumatic neuropsychiatric sequelae, which can cause immense anxiety or fear and worsen recovery. In this report, we examined the effect of low-dose esketamine versus dexmedetomidine on postsurgical recovery among patients who underwent humerus surgery with interscalene brachial plexus block.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>In this prospective, randomized, controlled study, 141 patients aged 18 to 65 years who underwent humerus reduction and internal fixation were recruited. Patients were randomly assigned to two groups: esketamine (Group E: received 0.2 mg/kg (i.v.) esketamine administration, with subsequent continuous 0.15mg/kg/h infusion); dexmedetomidine (Group D: received 10-min 0.8µg/kg dexmedetomidine infusion, with 0.4ug/kg/h maintenance infusion). All infusions were terminated at closure of surgical incisions. Our major endpoint was the Quality of Recovery-40 (QoR-40) score on postoperative day 1 (POD-1). The secondary outcomes were QoR-40 POD-3, the intraoperative modified observer's assessment of alert/Sedation (MOAA/S) scores at 5 min (T1) and 10 min (T2) post i.v. administration, at operation initiation (T3), at 10 min interval (T4), 30 min interval (T5) post operation, and at the end of operation (T6), Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) at POD-1, additional postoperative analgesic usage and hospital stays. In addition, we analyzed safety indices, such as hemodynamic profile, postoperative nausea and vomiting, adverse events (AEs) involving the central nervous system.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The QoR-40 scores on POD-1 for Group E were substantially elevated relative to Group D. The T4 and T5 MOAA/S scores of Group D were lower relative to Group E. In comparison to Group E, Group D exhibited reduced T1 and T2 Mean arterial pressure (MAP) and T1-T6 Heart rate (HR). Lastly, we observed no marked alteration in other postsurgical AEs between the two patient cohorts.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Continuous low-dose esketamine infusion seems safely and tolerably, it significantly improves the postoperative recovery quality among patients with ASA I or II receiving elective humeral trauma surgery.</p>","PeriodicalId":11290,"journal":{"name":"Drug Design, Development and Therapy","volume":"19 ","pages":"3645-3655"},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12063633/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Drug Design, Development and Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/DDDT.S507427","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, MEDICINAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Patients with humeral fracture often suffer from post-traumatic neuropsychiatric sequelae, which can cause immense anxiety or fear and worsen recovery. In this report, we examined the effect of low-dose esketamine versus dexmedetomidine on postsurgical recovery among patients who underwent humerus surgery with interscalene brachial plexus block.

Patients and methods: In this prospective, randomized, controlled study, 141 patients aged 18 to 65 years who underwent humerus reduction and internal fixation were recruited. Patients were randomly assigned to two groups: esketamine (Group E: received 0.2 mg/kg (i.v.) esketamine administration, with subsequent continuous 0.15mg/kg/h infusion); dexmedetomidine (Group D: received 10-min 0.8µg/kg dexmedetomidine infusion, with 0.4ug/kg/h maintenance infusion). All infusions were terminated at closure of surgical incisions. Our major endpoint was the Quality of Recovery-40 (QoR-40) score on postoperative day 1 (POD-1). The secondary outcomes were QoR-40 POD-3, the intraoperative modified observer's assessment of alert/Sedation (MOAA/S) scores at 5 min (T1) and 10 min (T2) post i.v. administration, at operation initiation (T3), at 10 min interval (T4), 30 min interval (T5) post operation, and at the end of operation (T6), Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) at POD-1, additional postoperative analgesic usage and hospital stays. In addition, we analyzed safety indices, such as hemodynamic profile, postoperative nausea and vomiting, adverse events (AEs) involving the central nervous system.

Results: The QoR-40 scores on POD-1 for Group E were substantially elevated relative to Group D. The T4 and T5 MOAA/S scores of Group D were lower relative to Group E. In comparison to Group E, Group D exhibited reduced T1 and T2 Mean arterial pressure (MAP) and T1-T6 Heart rate (HR). Lastly, we observed no marked alteration in other postsurgical AEs between the two patient cohorts.

Conclusion: Continuous low-dose esketamine infusion seems safely and tolerably, it significantly improves the postoperative recovery quality among patients with ASA I or II receiving elective humeral trauma surgery.

低剂量艾氯胺酮与右美托咪定对肱骨创伤手术斜角间臂丛神经阻滞患者术后恢复质量的比较:一项随机、双盲、对照试验。
目的:肱骨骨折患者常伴有创伤后神经精神后遗症,可引起极大的焦虑或恐惧,不利于康复。在这篇报道中,我们研究了低剂量艾氯胺酮与右美托咪定对肱骨手术肩胛间臂丛阻滞患者术后恢复的影响。患者和方法:在这项前瞻性、随机、对照研究中,招募了141名年龄在18至65岁之间接受肱骨复位和内固定的患者。患者随机分为两组:艾氯胺酮组(E组:给予0.2 mg/kg(静脉注射)艾氯胺酮,随后连续输注0.15mg/kg/h);右美托咪定(D组:右美托咪定输注0.8µg/kg 10 min,维持输注0.4ug/kg/h)。所有输注均在手术切口闭合时终止。我们的主要终点是术后第1天的恢复质量-40 (QoR-40)评分(POD-1)。次要结果为QoR-40 POD-3,静脉给药后5分钟(T1)和10分钟(T2)、手术开始(T3)、术后10分钟间隔(T4)、30分钟间隔(T5)和手术结束(T6)时术中改进的观察者警觉/镇静(MOAA/S)评分,POD-1的数值评定量表(NRS),术后额外止痛药使用情况和住院时间。此外,我们还分析了安全性指标,如血流动力学特征、术后恶心和呕吐、涉及中枢神经系统的不良事件(ae)。结果:E组POD-1 QoR-40评分明显高于D组。D组T4、T5 MOAA/S评分明显低于E组。与E组比较,D组T1、T2平均动脉压(MAP)和T1- t6心率(HR)降低。最后,我们观察到两组患者的其他术后不良事件没有明显改变。结论:持续小剂量艾氯胺酮输注安全、耐受性好,可显著提高ASA I、II级患者择期肱骨外伤术后恢复质量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Drug Design, Development and Therapy
Drug Design, Development and Therapy CHEMISTRY, MEDICINAL-PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
CiteScore
9.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
382
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Drug Design, Development and Therapy is an international, peer-reviewed, open access journal that spans the spectrum of drug design, discovery and development through to clinical applications. The journal is characterized by the rapid reporting of high-quality original research, reviews, expert opinions, commentary and clinical studies in all therapeutic areas. Specific topics covered by the journal include: Drug target identification and validation Phenotypic screening and target deconvolution Biochemical analyses of drug targets and their pathways New methods or relevant applications in molecular/drug design and computer-aided drug discovery* Design, synthesis, and biological evaluation of novel biologically active compounds (including diagnostics or chemical probes) Structural or molecular biological studies elucidating molecular recognition processes Fragment-based drug discovery Pharmaceutical/red biotechnology Isolation, structural characterization, (bio)synthesis, bioengineering and pharmacological evaluation of natural products** Distribution, pharmacokinetics and metabolic transformations of drugs or biologically active compounds in drug development Drug delivery and formulation (design and characterization of dosage forms, release mechanisms and in vivo testing) Preclinical development studies Translational animal models Mechanisms of action and signalling pathways Toxicology Gene therapy, cell therapy and immunotherapy Personalized medicine and pharmacogenomics Clinical drug evaluation Patient safety and sustained use of medicines.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信