The Sleep-Wake Cycle Pattern of a Blind Trail Ultramarathon Runner and His Guide: The World's First Case.

IF 2.1 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Larissa Quintão Guilherme, Julia Pagotto Matos, Ana Claudia Pelissari Kravchychyn, Marco Tulio De Mello, Paulo Roberto Dos Santos Amorim, Helton de Sá Souza
{"title":"The Sleep-Wake Cycle Pattern of a Blind Trail Ultramarathon Runner and His Guide: The World's First Case.","authors":"Larissa Quintão Guilherme, Julia Pagotto Matos, Ana Claudia Pelissari Kravchychyn, Marco Tulio De Mello, Paulo Roberto Dos Santos Amorim, Helton de Sá Souza","doi":"10.3390/clockssleep7020020","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Trail running has seen a surge in participants, including individuals with disabilities, particularly in ultratrail running (UTRs). Sleep-wake patterns are crucial for optimal performances in UTRs, which present unique physiological and behavioral challenges. This case study evaluated the sleep-wake cycle of a blind trail ultramarathoner (BTR) and his guide (GTR) before, during, and after an 80 km UTR. Two male participants (BTR: 54 years, BMI: 26.1 kg/m<sup>2</sup>; GTR: 48 years, BMI: 24.2 kg/m<sup>2</sup>) were assessed using validated questionnaires (MEQ, ESS, ISI, and PSQI) and actigraphy over 35 days. The BTR exhibited a morning chronotype (MEQ = 63), mild insomnia (ISI = 11), poor sleep quality (PSQI = 5), and prolonged sleep latency (>60 min), while the GTR showed an indifferent chronotype (MEQ = 52), good sleep quality (PSQI = 3), and shorter latency (10 min). Post-competition, both athletes experienced an increased total sleep time (TST): the BTR by 17.8% (05:32:00 vs. 04:25:00) and the GTR by 5.5% (07:01:00 vs. 06:39:00). The BTR demonstrated a greater Wakefulness after sleep onset (WASO 01:00:00 vs. 00:49:00) and awakenings (15.4 vs. 6.1). A time series analysis revealed greater variability in the BTR's post-competition sleep efficiency and TST, while the GTR exhibited a greater stability of the circadian phase. These findings highlight the intricate sleep challenges faced by blind athletes, informing strategies to optimize recovery and performance.</p>","PeriodicalId":33568,"journal":{"name":"Clocks & Sleep","volume":"7 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12015783/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clocks & Sleep","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/clockssleep7020020","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Trail running has seen a surge in participants, including individuals with disabilities, particularly in ultratrail running (UTRs). Sleep-wake patterns are crucial for optimal performances in UTRs, which present unique physiological and behavioral challenges. This case study evaluated the sleep-wake cycle of a blind trail ultramarathoner (BTR) and his guide (GTR) before, during, and after an 80 km UTR. Two male participants (BTR: 54 years, BMI: 26.1 kg/m2; GTR: 48 years, BMI: 24.2 kg/m2) were assessed using validated questionnaires (MEQ, ESS, ISI, and PSQI) and actigraphy over 35 days. The BTR exhibited a morning chronotype (MEQ = 63), mild insomnia (ISI = 11), poor sleep quality (PSQI = 5), and prolonged sleep latency (>60 min), while the GTR showed an indifferent chronotype (MEQ = 52), good sleep quality (PSQI = 3), and shorter latency (10 min). Post-competition, both athletes experienced an increased total sleep time (TST): the BTR by 17.8% (05:32:00 vs. 04:25:00) and the GTR by 5.5% (07:01:00 vs. 06:39:00). The BTR demonstrated a greater Wakefulness after sleep onset (WASO 01:00:00 vs. 00:49:00) and awakenings (15.4 vs. 6.1). A time series analysis revealed greater variability in the BTR's post-competition sleep efficiency and TST, while the GTR exhibited a greater stability of the circadian phase. These findings highlight the intricate sleep challenges faced by blind athletes, informing strategies to optimize recovery and performance.

一个盲路超级马拉松运动员的睡眠-觉醒周期模式和他的指南:世界上第一个案例。
越野跑的参与者激增,其中包括残疾人,特别是超轨道跑(UTRs)。睡眠-觉醒模式对于utr的最佳表现至关重要,utr提出了独特的生理和行为挑战。本案例研究评估了盲道超级马拉松运动员(BTR)和他的向导(GTR)在80公里UTR之前、期间和之后的睡眠-觉醒周期。2名男性参与者(BTR: 54岁,BMI: 26.1 kg/m2;GTR: 48岁,BMI: 24.2 kg/m2)采用有效问卷(MEQ、ESS、ISI和PSQI)和35天的活动记录仪进行评估。BTR表现为早晨睡眠类型(MEQ = 63),轻度失眠(ISI = 11),睡眠质量差(PSQI = 5),睡眠潜伏期延长(bbb60 min),而GTR表现为无差异睡眠类型(MEQ = 52),睡眠质量好(PSQI = 3),潜伏期较短(10 min)。比赛结束后,两名运动员都经历了总睡眠时间(TST)的增加:BTR增加了17.8% (05:32:00 vs. 04:25:00), GTR增加了5.5% (07:01:00 vs. 06:39:00)。BTR在睡眠开始(WASO 01:00:00 vs. 00:49:00)和醒来(15.4 vs. 6.1)后表现出更大的清醒程度。时间序列分析显示,BTR的比赛后睡眠效率和TST变化较大,而GTR的昼夜节律阶段表现出更大的稳定性。这些发现突出了盲人运动员所面临的复杂的睡眠挑战,为优化恢复和表现提供了策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Clocks & Sleep
Clocks & Sleep Multiple-
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
7 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信