Threshold to initiate chest compressions for bradycardia at birth: A narrative review.

IF 2.4 3区 医学 Q2 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Mathijs Binkhorst, Elroy van Elsäcker, René P Matthijsse, Tim Antonius, Nienke A Timmermans, Arjan B Te Pas, Willem P de Boode, Marije Hogeveen
{"title":"Threshold to initiate chest compressions for bradycardia at birth: A narrative review.","authors":"Mathijs Binkhorst, Elroy van Elsäcker, René P Matthijsse, Tim Antonius, Nienke A Timmermans, Arjan B Te Pas, Willem P de Boode, Marije Hogeveen","doi":"10.1038/s41372-025-02320-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Neonatal resuscitation guidelines recommend initiating chest compressions (CC) in newborns at birth if heart rate (HR) remains <60 bpm after 30 s of ventilation. This threshold is based on expert opinion and scant animal data. Our aim was to systematically evaluate the existing evidence and appraise current insights regarding thresholds for starting CC during bradycardia at birth. A recent scoping review synthesized the evidence on various aspects of neonatal CC until November 2021. We updated this review, focusing on HR thresholds for CC, with a new systematic literature search in MEDLINE, Embase, and the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews until March 2024. No studies comparing HR thresholds for CC commencement at birth were identified. Consequently, we decided to review the literature more narratively, covering a wider range of topics within this subject matter. Relevant papers from the initial search were used and additional sources of information were sought using snowballing procedures. Numerous publications were identified, containing pathophysiological considerations, in vitro experiments, animal data, and some human data. Preliminary findings from a recent mathematical model study conducted in our center were also briefly considered. All this information enabled a thorough discussion on the rationale for CC during neonatal bradycardia. Finally, a survey was disseminated among knowledgeable neonatal clinicians and researchers to evaluate their perspectives on initiating CC for neonatal bradycardia. Of 183 survey respondents, 137 (74.9%) indicated they would wait longer than the currently recommended 30 s of assisted ventilation before starting CC in newborns with a HR (rising) between 30 and 60 bpm, acknowledging effective ventilation as a priority. We conclude that clinical evidence is lacking, though reconsideration of the threshold to initiate CC for bradycardia at birth seems justified based on available data. This is supported by the views of many surveyed professionals. Randomized trials in human infants and appropriate newborn animal models are warranted.</p>","PeriodicalId":16690,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Perinatology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Perinatology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41372-025-02320-2","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Neonatal resuscitation guidelines recommend initiating chest compressions (CC) in newborns at birth if heart rate (HR) remains <60 bpm after 30 s of ventilation. This threshold is based on expert opinion and scant animal data. Our aim was to systematically evaluate the existing evidence and appraise current insights regarding thresholds for starting CC during bradycardia at birth. A recent scoping review synthesized the evidence on various aspects of neonatal CC until November 2021. We updated this review, focusing on HR thresholds for CC, with a new systematic literature search in MEDLINE, Embase, and the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews until March 2024. No studies comparing HR thresholds for CC commencement at birth were identified. Consequently, we decided to review the literature more narratively, covering a wider range of topics within this subject matter. Relevant papers from the initial search were used and additional sources of information were sought using snowballing procedures. Numerous publications were identified, containing pathophysiological considerations, in vitro experiments, animal data, and some human data. Preliminary findings from a recent mathematical model study conducted in our center were also briefly considered. All this information enabled a thorough discussion on the rationale for CC during neonatal bradycardia. Finally, a survey was disseminated among knowledgeable neonatal clinicians and researchers to evaluate their perspectives on initiating CC for neonatal bradycardia. Of 183 survey respondents, 137 (74.9%) indicated they would wait longer than the currently recommended 30 s of assisted ventilation before starting CC in newborns with a HR (rising) between 30 and 60 bpm, acknowledging effective ventilation as a priority. We conclude that clinical evidence is lacking, though reconsideration of the threshold to initiate CC for bradycardia at birth seems justified based on available data. This is supported by the views of many surveyed professionals. Randomized trials in human infants and appropriate newborn animal models are warranted.

出生时心动过缓启动胸外按压的阈值:叙述性回顾。
新生儿复苏指南建议在新生儿出生时,如果心率(HR)保持不变,开始胸外按压(CC)
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Perinatology
Journal of Perinatology 医学-妇产科学
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
6.90%
发文量
284
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Perinatology provides members of the perinatal/neonatal healthcare team with original information pertinent to improving maternal/fetal and neonatal care. We publish peer-reviewed clinical research articles, state-of-the art reviews, comments, quality improvement reports, and letters to the editor. Articles published in the Journal of Perinatology embrace the full scope of the specialty, including clinical, professional, political, administrative and educational aspects. The Journal also explores legal and ethical issues, neonatal technology and product development. The Journal’s audience includes all those that participate in perinatal/neonatal care, including, but not limited to neonatologists, perinatologists, perinatal epidemiologists, pediatricians and pediatric subspecialists, surgeons, neonatal and perinatal nurses, respiratory therapists, pharmacists, social workers, dieticians, speech and hearing experts, other allied health professionals, as well as subspecialists who participate in patient care including radiologists, laboratory medicine and pathologists.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信