Impact of Propranolol and Psychologically Informed Intervention on Pain Sensitivity: Secondary Analysis from the Biopsychosocial Influence on Shoulder Pain Preclinical Randomized Trial.

IF 2.5 3区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Journal of Pain Research Pub Date : 2025-04-05 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.2147/JPR.S500140
Mark D Bishop, Corey B Simon, Yanan Huo, Margaret R Wallace, Paul A Borsa, Roger B Fillingim, Roland Staud, Samuel S Wu, Steven Z George
{"title":"Impact of Propranolol and Psychologically Informed Intervention on Pain Sensitivity: Secondary Analysis from the Biopsychosocial Influence on Shoulder Pain Preclinical Randomized Trial.","authors":"Mark D Bishop, Corey B Simon, Yanan Huo, Margaret R Wallace, Paul A Borsa, Roger B Fillingim, Roland Staud, Samuel S Wu, Steven Z George","doi":"10.2147/JPR.S500140","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Measures of pain sensitivity have potential relevance for patient care. We previously identified a subgroup of people at risk for ongoing pain characterized by genetic AND psychological factors. Here, we report planned secondary analyses examining the effect of personalized interventions on pain sensitivity outcomes.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>Two hundred and sixty-one healthy individuals with the COMT SNP rs6269 AA genotype and Pain Catastrophizing Scale scores of 5 or higher received exercise-induced muscle injury, followed by a randomly assigned treatment: (1) general education and placebo; (2) personalized psychological intervention and placebo; (3) general education and propranolol; or (4) personalized psychological intervention and propranolol. Pain sensitivity outcomes (pressure pain thresholds (PPT), suprathreshold heat rating, temporal summation, and conditioned pain modulation efficiency) were compared using a mixed effect model to examine difference among groups, adjusted for age, sex and race.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>No main effects for group assignment were noted (p > 0.05 for all), when considered as 4 groups or 2 collapsed groups (ie propranolol vs placebo or personalized psychologic vs general education). Interaction terms were then entered into our models in an exploratory fashion. For PPT outcomes interactions were noted for, sex and time, and race and time (p<0.015). For temporal summation outcomes, interactions were noted for sex and group and race and group (p < 0.015).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Results indicated no statistically reliable changes in pain sensitivity when considering matched vs unmatched treatment groups. Caution is needed in this interpretation given that the trial was not powered to specifically identify these differences. Exploratory analysis of interactions among ethnic/racial and gender identities by treatment, however, showed the potential for differential effects for specific pain sensitivity measures. Significant interactions across modalities suggest analysis of higher order interactions/intersectionality could be of great interest for testing efficacy of personalized interventions in future trials.</p>","PeriodicalId":16661,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pain Research","volume":"18 ","pages":"1837-1850"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11980936/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Pain Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/JPR.S500140","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Measures of pain sensitivity have potential relevance for patient care. We previously identified a subgroup of people at risk for ongoing pain characterized by genetic AND psychological factors. Here, we report planned secondary analyses examining the effect of personalized interventions on pain sensitivity outcomes.

Patients and methods: Two hundred and sixty-one healthy individuals with the COMT SNP rs6269 AA genotype and Pain Catastrophizing Scale scores of 5 or higher received exercise-induced muscle injury, followed by a randomly assigned treatment: (1) general education and placebo; (2) personalized psychological intervention and placebo; (3) general education and propranolol; or (4) personalized psychological intervention and propranolol. Pain sensitivity outcomes (pressure pain thresholds (PPT), suprathreshold heat rating, temporal summation, and conditioned pain modulation efficiency) were compared using a mixed effect model to examine difference among groups, adjusted for age, sex and race.

Results: No main effects for group assignment were noted (p > 0.05 for all), when considered as 4 groups or 2 collapsed groups (ie propranolol vs placebo or personalized psychologic vs general education). Interaction terms were then entered into our models in an exploratory fashion. For PPT outcomes interactions were noted for, sex and time, and race and time (p<0.015). For temporal summation outcomes, interactions were noted for sex and group and race and group (p < 0.015).

Conclusion: Results indicated no statistically reliable changes in pain sensitivity when considering matched vs unmatched treatment groups. Caution is needed in this interpretation given that the trial was not powered to specifically identify these differences. Exploratory analysis of interactions among ethnic/racial and gender identities by treatment, however, showed the potential for differential effects for specific pain sensitivity measures. Significant interactions across modalities suggest analysis of higher order interactions/intersectionality could be of great interest for testing efficacy of personalized interventions in future trials.

心得安和心理知情干预对疼痛敏感性的影响:来自肩痛临床前随机试验的生物心理社会影响的二次分析。
目的:测量疼痛敏感性对病人护理有潜在的相关性。我们之前确定了一个亚组的人有持续疼痛的风险,其特征是遗传和心理因素。在这里,我们报告了计划的二次分析,检查个性化干预对疼痛敏感性结果的影响。患者和方法:261名COMT SNP rs6269 AA基因型且疼痛灾难量表评分为5分及以上的健康个体接受运动性肌肉损伤,随后随机分配治疗:(1)普通教育和安慰剂;(2)个性化心理干预与安慰剂;(3)通识教育和心得安;(4)个性化心理干预和心得安。疼痛敏感性结果(压力疼痛阈值(PPT)、超阈值热评分、时间总和和条件疼痛调节效率)使用混合效应模型进行比较,以检查组间差异,并根据年龄、性别和种族进行调整。结果:当被视为4组或2个崩溃组(即普萘洛尔vs安慰剂或个性化心理教育vs通识教育)时,没有注意到组分配的主要影响(p < 0.05)。然后以探索的方式将交互术语输入到我们的模型中。对于PPT结果,性别和时间、种族和时间的相互作用被注意到(结论:结果表明,在考虑匹配和不匹配的治疗组时,疼痛敏感性没有统计学上可靠的变化。考虑到该试验不能明确识别这些差异,在这种解释中需要谨慎。然而,通过治疗对民族/种族和性别身份之间的相互作用进行探索性分析,显示了特定疼痛敏感性测量的潜在差异效应。模式之间的显著相互作用表明,在未来的试验中,分析高阶相互作用/交叉性可能对测试个性化干预的有效性非常有兴趣。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Pain Research
Journal of Pain Research CLINICAL NEUROLOGY-
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
3.70%
发文量
411
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Pain Research is an international, peer-reviewed, open access journal that welcomes laboratory and clinical findings in the fields of pain research and the prevention and management of pain. Original research, reviews, symposium reports, hypothesis formation and commentaries are all considered for publication. Additionally, the journal now welcomes the submission of pain-policy-related editorials and commentaries, particularly in regard to ethical, regulatory, forensic, and other legal issues in pain medicine, and to the education of pain practitioners and researchers.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信