Prediction of overbite improvement in deep bite correction using clear aligner therapy.

Q2 Dentistry
Journal of Orthodontic Science Pub Date : 2025-03-25 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.4103/jos.jos_87_24
Thu-Trang Pham, Hong Thuy Pham Thi, Cao Binh Tran, Ngoc Quang Dong, Viet Hoang
{"title":"Prediction of overbite improvement in deep bite correction using clear aligner therapy.","authors":"Thu-Trang Pham, Hong Thuy Pham Thi, Cao Binh Tran, Ngoc Quang Dong, Viet Hoang","doi":"10.4103/jos.jos_87_24","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study aimed to determine the accuracy of overbite correction in patients with deep bite using the clear aligner therapy (CAT).</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>This retrospective study included 31 patients prescribed orthodontic treatment using CAT from January 2020 to January 2024. Clinical information was collected via X-ray results at pre-treatment and post-treatment stages. Treatment outcomes were measured at three stages: pre-treatment, post-treatment (clinical results), and predict treatment (predict results) as programmed in ClinCheck®.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Significant changes were observed in X-ray in both overbite (3.85 ± 1.38 mm to 2.93 ± 1.13 mm) and overjet (5.19 ± 1.79 mm to 3.43 ± 1.14 mm) following CAT. For clinical crown lengthening (CCL) of tooth 31, significant differences were noted between pre-treatment and post-treatment (-0.31 ± 0.66 mm) and between predicted and clinical results (-0.21 ± 0.58 mm). For CCL of tooth 41, significant differences were found between pre-treatment and post-treatment (-0.36 ± 0.66 mm) and between prediction and post-treatment (-0.32 ± 0.65 mm). The percentage of deep bites differed significantly between pre-treatment vs predicted treatment (38.10 ± 14.90%), pre-treatment vs post-treatment (11.80 ± 14.30%), and predicted treatment vs post-treatment (-26.40 ± 12.60%). Similar trends were observed in mean overbite (2.77 ± 1.07 mm, 0.69 ± 0.93 mm, and - 2.08 ± 0.83 mm, respectively).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our findings support the use of CAT as a reliable and aesthetic option for treating deep bite malocclusions.</p>","PeriodicalId":16604,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Orthodontic Science","volume":"14 ","pages":"8"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12036758/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Orthodontic Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/jos.jos_87_24","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Dentistry","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: This study aimed to determine the accuracy of overbite correction in patients with deep bite using the clear aligner therapy (CAT).

Materials and methods: This retrospective study included 31 patients prescribed orthodontic treatment using CAT from January 2020 to January 2024. Clinical information was collected via X-ray results at pre-treatment and post-treatment stages. Treatment outcomes were measured at three stages: pre-treatment, post-treatment (clinical results), and predict treatment (predict results) as programmed in ClinCheck®.

Results: Significant changes were observed in X-ray in both overbite (3.85 ± 1.38 mm to 2.93 ± 1.13 mm) and overjet (5.19 ± 1.79 mm to 3.43 ± 1.14 mm) following CAT. For clinical crown lengthening (CCL) of tooth 31, significant differences were noted between pre-treatment and post-treatment (-0.31 ± 0.66 mm) and between predicted and clinical results (-0.21 ± 0.58 mm). For CCL of tooth 41, significant differences were found between pre-treatment and post-treatment (-0.36 ± 0.66 mm) and between prediction and post-treatment (-0.32 ± 0.65 mm). The percentage of deep bites differed significantly between pre-treatment vs predicted treatment (38.10 ± 14.90%), pre-treatment vs post-treatment (11.80 ± 14.30%), and predicted treatment vs post-treatment (-26.40 ± 12.60%). Similar trends were observed in mean overbite (2.77 ± 1.07 mm, 0.69 ± 0.93 mm, and - 2.08 ± 0.83 mm, respectively).

Conclusions: Our findings support the use of CAT as a reliable and aesthetic option for treating deep bite malocclusions.

预测使用透明矫正器治疗深咬合矫正时覆盖咬合的改善。
目的:本研究旨在确定在深咬合患者中使用透明矫正器(clear aligner therapy, CAT)进行复咬合矫正的准确性。材料和方法:本回顾性研究纳入了2020年1月至2024年1月31例使用CAT进行正畸治疗的患者。通过治疗前和治疗后的x线结果收集临床信息。治疗结果分为三个阶段:治疗前、治疗后(临床结果)和预测治疗(预测结果),如ClinCheck®程序所述。结果:CAT术后复牙合(3.85±1.38 mm ~ 2.93±1.13 mm)和复牙合(5.19±1.79 mm ~ 3.43±1.14 mm) x线变化明显。对于31号牙的临床冠延长(CCL),治疗前与治疗后差异显著(-0.31±0.66 mm),预测与临床结果差异显著(-0.21±0.58 mm)。41号牙CCL治疗前与治疗后差异显著(-0.36±0.66 mm),预测与治疗后差异显著(-0.32±0.65 mm)。治疗前与预测治疗(38.10±14.90%)、治疗前与治疗后(11.80±14.30%)、预测治疗与治疗后(-26.40±12.60%)的深度咬伤比例差异显著。平均复咬合为2.77±1.07 mm, 0.69±0.93 mm, - 2.08±0.83 mm。结论:我们的研究结果支持使用CAT作为治疗深咬合错的可靠和美观的选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Orthodontic Science
Journal of Orthodontic Science Dentistry-Orthodontics
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
46
审稿时长
19 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信