A systematic review on endoscopic ultrasound in gastric neuroendocrine neoplasms: guidelines outpacing evidence.

IF 2.3 Q3 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
Clinical Endoscopy Pub Date : 2025-07-01 Epub Date: 2025-04-24 DOI:10.5946/ce.2024.343
Matteo Marasco, Gianluca Esposito, Marianna Signoretti, Maria Rinzivillo, Francesco Panzuto
{"title":"A systematic review on endoscopic ultrasound in gastric neuroendocrine neoplasms: guidelines outpacing evidence.","authors":"Matteo Marasco, Gianluca Esposito, Marianna Signoretti, Maria Rinzivillo, Francesco Panzuto","doi":"10.5946/ce.2024.343","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Gastric neuroendocrine neoplasms (g-NENs), though rare, have shown a rise in incidence due to increased endoscopic screening and improved diagnostic awareness. International guidelines recommend the use of endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) in managing g-NENs to evaluate subepithelial lesion size, depth, and lymph node involvement before endoscopic resection. However, the supporting evidence for EUS's role in g-NENs is scarce and limited.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>According to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines, a comprehensive literature search was conducted on PubMed to identify studies about the role of EUS in g-NENs, including both retrospective and prospective human studies.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 355 studies were considered; however, only seven studies focusing on EUS's diagnostic utility in g-NENs were selected, including only 44 patients. EUS showed promise in assessing tumor characteristics critical for endoscopic resection. Nevertheless, its diagnostic accuracy remained variable across lesion types, and its impact on clinical decision-making in g-NENs lacked robust evidence. EUS contributed to subepithelial lesion staging but was underrepresented in neuroendocrine tumor-specific studies, creating a knowledge gap.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This review underscores the need for larger multicenter studies to validate EUS's efficacy and reliability in g-NEN management. Prospective trials are crucial to strengthen guidelines and provide clearer clinical guidance for managing these tumors.</p>","PeriodicalId":10351,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Endoscopy","volume":" ","pages":"525-532"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12314622/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Endoscopy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5946/ce.2024.343","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/4/24 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Gastric neuroendocrine neoplasms (g-NENs), though rare, have shown a rise in incidence due to increased endoscopic screening and improved diagnostic awareness. International guidelines recommend the use of endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) in managing g-NENs to evaluate subepithelial lesion size, depth, and lymph node involvement before endoscopic resection. However, the supporting evidence for EUS's role in g-NENs is scarce and limited.

Methods: According to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines, a comprehensive literature search was conducted on PubMed to identify studies about the role of EUS in g-NENs, including both retrospective and prospective human studies.

Results: A total of 355 studies were considered; however, only seven studies focusing on EUS's diagnostic utility in g-NENs were selected, including only 44 patients. EUS showed promise in assessing tumor characteristics critical for endoscopic resection. Nevertheless, its diagnostic accuracy remained variable across lesion types, and its impact on clinical decision-making in g-NENs lacked robust evidence. EUS contributed to subepithelial lesion staging but was underrepresented in neuroendocrine tumor-specific studies, creating a knowledge gap.

Conclusions: This review underscores the need for larger multicenter studies to validate EUS's efficacy and reliability in g-NEN management. Prospective trials are crucial to strengthen guidelines and provide clearer clinical guidance for managing these tumors.

内镜超声诊断胃神经内分泌肿瘤的系统综述:指南高于证据。
背景/目的:胃神经内分泌肿瘤(g-NENs)虽然罕见,但由于内镜筛查的增加和诊断意识的提高,其发病率有所上升。国际指南推荐使用内镜超声(EUS)治疗g-NENs,在内镜切除前评估上皮下病变的大小、深度和淋巴结累及情况。然而,支持EUS在g-NENs中的作用的证据很少且有限。方法:根据系统评价和荟萃分析指南的首选报告项目,在PubMed上进行了全面的文献检索,以确定EUS在g-NENs中作用的研究,包括回顾性和前瞻性人体研究。结果:共纳入355项研究;然而,只有7例纳入,突出了EUS在g-NENs中的诊断效用,只有44例具体病例。EUS在评估对内镜切除至关重要的肿瘤特征方面显示出前景。然而,其诊断准确性在不同的病变类型中仍然存在差异,其对g-NENs临床决策的影响缺乏强有力的证据。EUS有助于上皮下病变分期,但在神经内分泌肿瘤特异性研究中代表性不足,造成知识空白。结论:本综述强调需要更大规模的多中心研究来验证EUS在g-NEN治疗中的有效性和可靠性。前瞻性试验对于加强指南和为治疗这些肿瘤提供更清晰的临床指导至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Clinical Endoscopy
Clinical Endoscopy GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY-
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
8.00%
发文量
95
审稿时长
26 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信