Unveiling nitrogen preferences in indica rice: a classification study of cultivars in South China.

IF 4.1 2区 生物学 Q1 PLANT SCIENCES
Frontiers in Plant Science Pub Date : 2025-04-28 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.3389/fpls.2025.1568383
Chu-Sheng Lu, Jia-Jun Lai, Xian-Ting Fan, Kai-Ming Liang, Yuan-Hong Yin, Qun-Huan Ye, Hong Shen, You-Qiang Fu
{"title":"Unveiling nitrogen preferences in <i>indica</i> rice: a classification study of cultivars in South China.","authors":"Chu-Sheng Lu, Jia-Jun Lai, Xian-Ting Fan, Kai-Ming Liang, Yuan-Hong Yin, Qun-Huan Ye, Hong Shen, You-Qiang Fu","doi":"10.3389/fpls.2025.1568383","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Do <i>indica</i> rice cultivars prefer ammonium or nitrate? Understanding this preference is key to optimizing nitrogen use efficiency in rice production. Ammonium and nitrate are crucial for plant nitrogen nutrition, as rice cultivars exhibit varying preferences. However, few studies have classified ammonium and nitrate preferences within <i>indica</i> cultivars.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>For the first time, this study classifies <i>indica</i> rice cultivars based on their ammonium and nitrate preferences, revealing significant differences in biomass production under various nitrogen treatments. This study investigated the effects of ammonium-only nutrition (100:0), ammonium-nitrate mixed nutrition (75:25), and nitrate-only nutrition (0:100) on the maximum root length, shoot length, SPAD value, and biomass of 24 widely cultivated <i>indica</i> cultivars in South China.</p><p><strong>Result: </strong>Compared to ammonium-only nutrition, a mixed ammonium-nitrate treatment significantly boosted root and shoot growth, while nitrate-only nutrition led to a decline in chlorophyll content. Compared with the 100:0 treatment, the maximum root length, shoot length, root dry weight, shoot dry weight, and total dry weight in the 75:25 treatment significantly increased by 29.85%, 4.11%, 7.65%, 1.71% and 3.03% (p < 0.01), respectively; and the SPAD value in the 0:100 treatment significantly decreased by 4.22% (<i>p</i> < 0.01).</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>These results demonstrate distinct responses of rice cultivars to different nitrogen treatments. Through correlation, principal component, and cluster analyses, the rice cultivars were categorized into three types: ammonium-preferring type (APT), ammonium- and nitrate-preferring type (ANPT), and nitrate-preferring type (NPT). The APT, ANPT, and NPT showed the highest biomass in the 100:0, 75:25, and 0:100 treatments, respectively, with the biomass in the ANPT significantly exceeding that of the APT (<i>p</i> < 0.01). These insights provide a foundation for breeding high-yield <i>indica</i> rice, optimizing nitrogen fertilizer strategies, and improving nitrogen use efficiency in sustainable agriculture.</p>","PeriodicalId":12632,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Plant Science","volume":"16 ","pages":"1568383"},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12066440/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Plant Science","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2025.1568383","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PLANT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Do indica rice cultivars prefer ammonium or nitrate? Understanding this preference is key to optimizing nitrogen use efficiency in rice production. Ammonium and nitrate are crucial for plant nitrogen nutrition, as rice cultivars exhibit varying preferences. However, few studies have classified ammonium and nitrate preferences within indica cultivars.

Methods: For the first time, this study classifies indica rice cultivars based on their ammonium and nitrate preferences, revealing significant differences in biomass production under various nitrogen treatments. This study investigated the effects of ammonium-only nutrition (100:0), ammonium-nitrate mixed nutrition (75:25), and nitrate-only nutrition (0:100) on the maximum root length, shoot length, SPAD value, and biomass of 24 widely cultivated indica cultivars in South China.

Result: Compared to ammonium-only nutrition, a mixed ammonium-nitrate treatment significantly boosted root and shoot growth, while nitrate-only nutrition led to a decline in chlorophyll content. Compared with the 100:0 treatment, the maximum root length, shoot length, root dry weight, shoot dry weight, and total dry weight in the 75:25 treatment significantly increased by 29.85%, 4.11%, 7.65%, 1.71% and 3.03% (p < 0.01), respectively; and the SPAD value in the 0:100 treatment significantly decreased by 4.22% (p < 0.01).

Discussion: These results demonstrate distinct responses of rice cultivars to different nitrogen treatments. Through correlation, principal component, and cluster analyses, the rice cultivars were categorized into three types: ammonium-preferring type (APT), ammonium- and nitrate-preferring type (ANPT), and nitrate-preferring type (NPT). The APT, ANPT, and NPT showed the highest biomass in the 100:0, 75:25, and 0:100 treatments, respectively, with the biomass in the ANPT significantly exceeding that of the APT (p < 0.01). These insights provide a foundation for breeding high-yield indica rice, optimizing nitrogen fertilizer strategies, and improving nitrogen use efficiency in sustainable agriculture.

揭示籼稻氮素偏好:华南栽培品种分类研究。
导读:籼稻品种更喜欢铵盐还是硝酸盐?了解这种偏好是优化水稻氮素利用效率的关键。铵和硝是植物氮营养的关键,因为水稻品种表现出不同的偏好。然而,很少有研究对籼稻品种对铵态氮和硝态氮的偏好进行分类。方法:首次根据籼稻品种对铵态氮和硝态氮的偏好对其进行分类,揭示了不同氮肥处理下籼稻生物量的显著差异。研究了纯铵营养(100:0)、硝铵混合营养(75:25)和纯硝酸盐营养(0:100)对24个华南地区广泛栽培的籼稻品种最大根长、茎长、SPAD值和生物量的影响。结果:与单铵营养相比,铵硝混合处理显著促进了根和梢的生长,而单硝营养导致叶绿素含量下降。与100:0处理相比,75:25处理的最大根长、茎长、根干重、茎干重和总干重分别极显著提高了29.85%、4.11%、7.65%、1.71%和3.03% (p < 0.01);0∶100处理SPAD值极显著降低4.22% (p < 0.01)。讨论:这些结果表明不同水稻品种对不同氮素处理的反应不同。通过相关分析、主成分分析和聚类分析,将水稻品种划分为氨偏好型(APT)、铵硝偏好型(ANPT)和硝酸盐偏好型(NPT) 3种类型。在100∶0、75∶25和0∶100处理下,APT、ANPT和NPT的生物量最高,且ANPT的生物量显著高于APT (p < 0.01)。这些见解为培育高产籼稻、优化氮肥策略、提高可持续农业氮素利用效率提供了基础。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Frontiers in Plant Science
Frontiers in Plant Science PLANT SCIENCES-
CiteScore
7.30
自引率
14.30%
发文量
4844
审稿时长
14 weeks
期刊介绍: In an ever changing world, plant science is of the utmost importance for securing the future well-being of humankind. Plants provide oxygen, food, feed, fibers, and building materials. In addition, they are a diverse source of industrial and pharmaceutical chemicals. Plants are centrally important to the health of ecosystems, and their understanding is critical for learning how to manage and maintain a sustainable biosphere. Plant science is extremely interdisciplinary, reaching from agricultural science to paleobotany, and molecular physiology to ecology. It uses the latest developments in computer science, optics, molecular biology and genomics to address challenges in model systems, agricultural crops, and ecosystems. Plant science research inquires into the form, function, development, diversity, reproduction, evolution and uses of both higher and lower plants and their interactions with other organisms throughout the biosphere. Frontiers in Plant Science welcomes outstanding contributions in any field of plant science from basic to applied research, from organismal to molecular studies, from single plant analysis to studies of populations and whole ecosystems, and from molecular to biophysical to computational approaches. Frontiers in Plant Science publishes articles on the most outstanding discoveries across a wide research spectrum of Plant Science. The mission of Frontiers in Plant Science is to bring all relevant Plant Science areas together on a single platform.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信