Post-exertional malaise in Long COVID: subjective reporting versus objective assessment.

IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Frontiers in Neurology Pub Date : 2025-04-23 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.3389/fneur.2025.1534352
Barbara Stussman, Nathan Camarillo, Gayle McCrossin, Marybeth Stockman, Gina Norato, C Stephenie Vetter, Alenka Ferrufino, Ashade Adedamola, Nicholas Grayson, Avindra Nath, Leighton Chan, Brian Walitt, Lisa M K Chin
{"title":"Post-exertional malaise in Long COVID: subjective reporting versus objective assessment.","authors":"Barbara Stussman, Nathan Camarillo, Gayle McCrossin, Marybeth Stockman, Gina Norato, C Stephenie Vetter, Alenka Ferrufino, Ashade Adedamola, Nicholas Grayson, Avindra Nath, Leighton Chan, Brian Walitt, Lisa M K Chin","doi":"10.3389/fneur.2025.1534352","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Post-exertional malaise (PEM) is a central feature of myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome (ME/CFS) and has emerged as a prominent feature of Long COVID. The optimal clinical approach to PEM is inconclusive, and studies of the impact of exercise have yielded contradictory results.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The objective of this study was to examine PEM in Long COVID by assessing the prevalence of self-reported PEM across study cohorts and symptom responses of Long COVID patients to a standardized exercise stressor. Secondarily, Long COVID symptom responses to exercise were compared to those of ME/CFS and healthy volunteers.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data from three registered clinical trials comprised four cohorts in this study: Long COVID Questionnaire Cohort (QC; <i>n</i> = 244), Long COVID Exercise Cohort (EC; <i>n</i> = 34), ME/CFS cohort (<i>n</i> = 9), and healthy volunteers (HV; <i>n</i> = 9). All cohorts completed questionnaires related to physical function, fatigue, and/or PEM symptoms. EC also performed a standardized exercise test (cardiopulmonary exercise test, CPET), and the PEM response to CPET was assessed using visual analog scales and qualitative interviews (QIs) administered serially over 72 h. EC PEM measures were compared to ME/CFS and HV cohorts. A secondary analysis of QI explored positive responses to CPET among EC, ME/CFS and HV.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Self-reported PEM was 67% in QC and estimated at 27% in EC. Only 2 of 34 EC patients (5.9%) were observed to develop PEM after a CPET. In addition, PEM responses after CPET in Long COVID were not as severe and prolonged as those assessed in ME/CFS. Twenty-two of 34 EC patients (64.7%) expressed at least one of 7 positive themes after the CPET.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Self-report of PEM is common in Long COVID. However, observable PEM following an exercise stressor was not frequent in this small cohort. When present, PEM descriptions during QI were less severe in Long COVID than in ME/CFS. Positive responses after an exercise stressor were common in Long COVID. Exercise testing to determine the presence of PEM may have utility for guiding clinical management of Long COVID.</p>","PeriodicalId":12575,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Neurology","volume":"16 ","pages":"1534352"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12055772/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Neurology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2025.1534352","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Post-exertional malaise (PEM) is a central feature of myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome (ME/CFS) and has emerged as a prominent feature of Long COVID. The optimal clinical approach to PEM is inconclusive, and studies of the impact of exercise have yielded contradictory results.

Objective: The objective of this study was to examine PEM in Long COVID by assessing the prevalence of self-reported PEM across study cohorts and symptom responses of Long COVID patients to a standardized exercise stressor. Secondarily, Long COVID symptom responses to exercise were compared to those of ME/CFS and healthy volunteers.

Methods: Data from three registered clinical trials comprised four cohorts in this study: Long COVID Questionnaire Cohort (QC; n = 244), Long COVID Exercise Cohort (EC; n = 34), ME/CFS cohort (n = 9), and healthy volunteers (HV; n = 9). All cohorts completed questionnaires related to physical function, fatigue, and/or PEM symptoms. EC also performed a standardized exercise test (cardiopulmonary exercise test, CPET), and the PEM response to CPET was assessed using visual analog scales and qualitative interviews (QIs) administered serially over 72 h. EC PEM measures were compared to ME/CFS and HV cohorts. A secondary analysis of QI explored positive responses to CPET among EC, ME/CFS and HV.

Results: Self-reported PEM was 67% in QC and estimated at 27% in EC. Only 2 of 34 EC patients (5.9%) were observed to develop PEM after a CPET. In addition, PEM responses after CPET in Long COVID were not as severe and prolonged as those assessed in ME/CFS. Twenty-two of 34 EC patients (64.7%) expressed at least one of 7 positive themes after the CPET.

Conclusion: Self-report of PEM is common in Long COVID. However, observable PEM following an exercise stressor was not frequent in this small cohort. When present, PEM descriptions during QI were less severe in Long COVID than in ME/CFS. Positive responses after an exercise stressor were common in Long COVID. Exercise testing to determine the presence of PEM may have utility for guiding clinical management of Long COVID.

长冠肺炎患者运动后不适:主观报告与客观评估
背景:运动后不适(PEM)是肌痛性脑脊髓炎/慢性疲劳综合征(ME/CFS)的核心特征,并已成为新冠肺炎的一个突出特征。治疗PEM的最佳临床方法尚无定论,对运动影响的研究也得出了相互矛盾的结果。目的:本研究的目的是通过评估研究队列中自我报告的PEM的患病率以及Long COVID患者对标准化运动应激源的症状反应来检查Long COVID的PEM。其次,将长COVID症状对运动的反应与ME/CFS和健康志愿者进行比较。方法:本研究的数据来自3项注册临床试验,包括4个队列:长COVID问卷队列(QC;n = 244),长期COVID运动队列(EC;n = 34)、ME/CFS队列(n = 9)和健康志愿者(HV;n = 9)。所有队列都完成了与身体功能、疲劳和/或PEM症状相关的问卷调查。EC还进行了标准化运动测试(心肺运动测试,CPET),并使用视觉模拟量表和在72 h内连续进行的定性访谈(QIs)评估PEM对CPET的反应。将EC组的PEM与ME/CFS组和HV组进行比较。QI的二次分析发现EC、ME/CFS和HV对CPET有积极反应。结果:QC中自我报告的PEM为67%,EC中估计为27%。34例EC患者中仅有2例(5.9%)在CPET后发生PEM。此外,长冠肺炎患者CPET后的PEM反应不像ME/CFS评估的那样严重和持久。34例EC患者中有22例(64.7%)在CPET后至少表现出7个阳性主题中的一个。结论:长冠肺炎患者自我报告PEM较为常见。然而,在这个小队列中,运动应激源后可观察到的PEM并不常见。当出现时,长COVID在QI期间的PEM描述不如ME/CFS严重。运动应激源后的积极反应在长期COVID中很常见。运动测试以确定PEM的存在可能对指导长COVID的临床管理具有实用价值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Frontiers in Neurology
Frontiers in Neurology CLINICAL NEUROLOGYNEUROSCIENCES -NEUROSCIENCES
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
8.80%
发文量
2792
审稿时长
14 weeks
期刊介绍: The section Stroke aims to quickly and accurately publish important experimental, translational and clinical studies, and reviews that contribute to the knowledge of stroke, its causes, manifestations, diagnosis, and management.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信