Technology-enabled community pharmacies: qualitative evaluation of a framework for assessing technology solutions.

IF 1.5 Q3 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Ayomide Ogundipe, Tin Fei Sim, Lynne Emmerton
{"title":"Technology-enabled community pharmacies: qualitative evaluation of a framework for assessing technology solutions.","authors":"Ayomide Ogundipe, Tin Fei Sim, Lynne Emmerton","doi":"10.1093/ijpp/riaf026","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Optimal provision of pharmacists' professional services requires integrated digital health platforms and ideally an evaluation framework to guide implementation and adoption. The Technology Evaluation Key (TEK) framework, which combines three published models describing technology usage behaviour, had not been applied to identify technological needs for community pharmacists to enable practice. This research aimed to describe pharmacists' needs relating to information communication technology (ICT) platforms and apply the findings to refine the TEK framework.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study was conducted in Australia between June and July 2022 (approval number HRE2022-0249). A systematic scoping review, face and content validation, and field testing guided the development of the interview tool. Semi-structured online interviews were conducted with participants until data saturation, where no new themes emerged. Following Braun and Clarke's six-step reflexive thematic analysis, a deductive-to-inductive approach was utilised to identify themes, which were applied to the TEK framework to refine domains. Coding was conducted by [A.O.] and confirmed by consensus with the other authors.</p><p><strong>Key findings: </strong>Twenty-four pharmacists were interviewed. Thematic analysis identified technological needs that included greater system integration, interoperability, and increased user access to nationally commissioned ICT systems. The TEK framework was refined from nine to eight domains accordingly (healthcare system, organisation, practitioner, ICT, user experience, logistics and operations, system integrity, and clinical impact).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study highlighted areas for improvement in implementing ICT platforms to meet the needs of community pharmacists as users of these technologies. The refined TEK framework can guide ICT development, implementation, and evaluation.</p>","PeriodicalId":14284,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Pharmacy Practice","volume":" ","pages":"279-291"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Pharmacy Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ijpp/riaf026","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: Optimal provision of pharmacists' professional services requires integrated digital health platforms and ideally an evaluation framework to guide implementation and adoption. The Technology Evaluation Key (TEK) framework, which combines three published models describing technology usage behaviour, had not been applied to identify technological needs for community pharmacists to enable practice. This research aimed to describe pharmacists' needs relating to information communication technology (ICT) platforms and apply the findings to refine the TEK framework.

Methods: This study was conducted in Australia between June and July 2022 (approval number HRE2022-0249). A systematic scoping review, face and content validation, and field testing guided the development of the interview tool. Semi-structured online interviews were conducted with participants until data saturation, where no new themes emerged. Following Braun and Clarke's six-step reflexive thematic analysis, a deductive-to-inductive approach was utilised to identify themes, which were applied to the TEK framework to refine domains. Coding was conducted by [A.O.] and confirmed by consensus with the other authors.

Key findings: Twenty-four pharmacists were interviewed. Thematic analysis identified technological needs that included greater system integration, interoperability, and increased user access to nationally commissioned ICT systems. The TEK framework was refined from nine to eight domains accordingly (healthcare system, organisation, practitioner, ICT, user experience, logistics and operations, system integrity, and clinical impact).

Conclusions: This study highlighted areas for improvement in implementing ICT platforms to meet the needs of community pharmacists as users of these technologies. The refined TEK framework can guide ICT development, implementation, and evaluation.

技术支持的社区药房:评估技术解决方案框架的定性评价。
目的:药师专业服务的优化提供需要集成的数字健康平台,最好有一个评估框架来指导实施和采用。技术评估关键(TEK)框架结合了描述技术使用行为的三个已发表的模型,尚未应用于确定社区药剂师的技术需求以使实践成为可能。本研究旨在描述药师对信息通信技术(ICT)平台的需求,并应用研究结果来完善TEK框架。方法:本研究于2022年6月至7月在澳大利亚进行(批准号HRE2022-0249)。系统的范围审查、面部和内容验证以及现场测试指导了访谈工具的开发。对参与者进行半结构化的在线访谈,直到数据饱和,没有新的主题出现。继Braun和Clarke的六步反思性主位分析之后,我们采用了演绎到归纳的方法来识别主位,并将其应用于TEK框架来细化领域。编码由[A.O.]进行]并得到其他作者的一致认可。主要发现:对24名药剂师进行了访谈。专题分析确定了技术需求,包括加强系统集成、互操作性和增加用户使用国家委托的信通技术系统。TEK框架相应地从9个领域细化到8个领域(医疗保健系统、组织、从业者、ICT、用户体验、物流和运营、系统完整性和临床影响)。结论:本研究强调了在实施ICT平台以满足社区药剂师作为这些技术用户的需求方面需要改进的领域。改进后的TEK框架可以指导ICT的开发、实施和评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
5.60%
发文量
146
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Pharmacy Practice (IJPP) is a Medline-indexed, peer reviewed, international journal. It is one of the leading journals publishing health services research in the context of pharmacy, pharmaceutical care, medicines and medicines management. Regular sections in the journal include, editorials, literature reviews, original research, personal opinion and short communications. Topics covered include: medicines utilisation, medicine management, medicines distribution, supply and administration, pharmaceutical services, professional and patient/lay perspectives, public health (including, e.g. health promotion, needs assessment, health protection) evidence based practice, pharmacy education. Methods include both evaluative and exploratory work including, randomised controlled trials, surveys, epidemiological approaches, case studies, observational studies, and qualitative methods such as interviews and focus groups. Application of methods drawn from other disciplines e.g. psychology, health economics, morbidity are especially welcome as are developments of new methodologies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信