Diagnostic Eye Drops and Pain Sensitivity: A Marker for Dry Eye Syndrome?

IF 1.9 3区 医学 Q2 OPHTHALMOLOGY
Oded Rock, Margarita Safir, Michael Mimouni, Roie Holzman, Irit Bahar, Avihu Pereg, Dan Gaton
{"title":"Diagnostic Eye Drops and Pain Sensitivity: A Marker for Dry Eye Syndrome?","authors":"Oded Rock, Margarita Safir, Michael Mimouni, Roie Holzman, Irit Bahar, Avihu Pereg, Dan Gaton","doi":"10.1097/ICO.0000000000003893","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The aim of this prospective study was to evaluate whether the duration and intensity of pain induced by commonly used diagnostic eye drops correlate with the presence and severity of dry eye syndrome.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study included 33 patients (66 eyes) undergoing routine evaluations at tertiary ophthalmology clinics from 2016 to 2017. Each eye received one drop of either oxybuprocaine or tropicamide. Pain intensity and duration were assessed using a visual analog scale and a stopwatch. Dry eye syndrome was diagnosed and graded according to international guidelines, incorporating clinical signs and standardized tests. Statistical analyses included Kruskal-Wallis tests for discrete variables and Pearson correlations for continuous variables, with significance set at P <0.05.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Patients with dry eye syndrome experienced significantly longer pain duration compared with those with healthy eyes (P = 0.035). Pain intensity was notably higher in patients with severe dry eye (P = 0.048). Duration of pain correlated with corneal fluorescein staining (P = 0.027). In eyes treated with oxybuprocaine, shorter tear break-up time and lower Schirmer test results were significantly associated with pain response (P = 0.021 and P = 0.037, respectively). In eyes treated with tropicamide, pain intensity was significantly associated with functional limitations (P = 0.042).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study highlights that pain sensitivity to commonly used diagnostic eye drops is a potential marker for the presence and severity of dry eye syndrome. Clinicians should consider evaluating pain responses during routine examinations as a simple, supplementary tool for identifying patients who may benefit from further diagnostic investigations and tailored management.</p>","PeriodicalId":10710,"journal":{"name":"Cornea","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cornea","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/ICO.0000000000003893","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: The aim of this prospective study was to evaluate whether the duration and intensity of pain induced by commonly used diagnostic eye drops correlate with the presence and severity of dry eye syndrome.

Methods: This study included 33 patients (66 eyes) undergoing routine evaluations at tertiary ophthalmology clinics from 2016 to 2017. Each eye received one drop of either oxybuprocaine or tropicamide. Pain intensity and duration were assessed using a visual analog scale and a stopwatch. Dry eye syndrome was diagnosed and graded according to international guidelines, incorporating clinical signs and standardized tests. Statistical analyses included Kruskal-Wallis tests for discrete variables and Pearson correlations for continuous variables, with significance set at P <0.05.

Results: Patients with dry eye syndrome experienced significantly longer pain duration compared with those with healthy eyes (P = 0.035). Pain intensity was notably higher in patients with severe dry eye (P = 0.048). Duration of pain correlated with corneal fluorescein staining (P = 0.027). In eyes treated with oxybuprocaine, shorter tear break-up time and lower Schirmer test results were significantly associated with pain response (P = 0.021 and P = 0.037, respectively). In eyes treated with tropicamide, pain intensity was significantly associated with functional limitations (P = 0.042).

Conclusions: This study highlights that pain sensitivity to commonly used diagnostic eye drops is a potential marker for the presence and severity of dry eye syndrome. Clinicians should consider evaluating pain responses during routine examinations as a simple, supplementary tool for identifying patients who may benefit from further diagnostic investigations and tailored management.

诊断性滴眼液和疼痛敏感性:干眼综合征的标志?
目的:本前瞻性研究的目的是评估常用诊断性滴眼液引起的疼痛持续时间和强度是否与干眼综合征的存在和严重程度相关。方法:本研究纳入2016 - 2017年在三级眼科门诊进行常规评估的33例患者(66只眼)。每只眼睛注射一滴奥布鲁卡因或tropicamide。使用视觉模拟量表和秒表评估疼痛强度和持续时间。根据国际指南诊断和分级干眼综合征,包括临床症状和标准化测试。统计分析采用离散变量的Kruskal-Wallis检验和连续变量的Pearson相关性检验,显著性设置为P。结果:干眼综合征患者的疼痛持续时间明显长于眼睛健康者(P = 0.035)。重度干眼症患者疼痛强度显著高于对照组(P = 0.048)。疼痛持续时间与角膜荧光素染色相关(P = 0.027)。在使用奥布鲁卡因治疗的眼睛中,较短的泪液破裂时间和较低的Schirmer试验结果与疼痛反应显著相关(P = 0.021和P = 0.037)。在使用tropicamide治疗的眼睛中,疼痛强度与功能限制显著相关(P = 0.042)。结论:本研究强调,对常用的诊断性滴眼液的疼痛敏感性是干眼综合征存在和严重程度的潜在标志。临床医生应考虑在常规检查中评估疼痛反应,作为一种简单的补充工具,以确定可能受益于进一步诊断调查和量身定制管理的患者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Cornea
Cornea 医学-眼科学
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
10.70%
发文量
354
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: For corneal specialists and for all general ophthalmologists with an interest in this exciting subspecialty, Cornea brings together the latest clinical and basic research on the cornea and the anterior segment of the eye. Each volume is peer-reviewed by Cornea''s board of world-renowned experts and fully indexed in archival format. Your subscription brings you the latest developments in your field and a growing library of valuable professional references. Sponsored by The Cornea Society which was founded as the Castroviejo Cornea Society in 1975.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信