Frailty in older adults patients: a prospective observational cohort study on subtype identification.

IF 2.8 3区 医学 Q2 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL
Zhikai Yang, Chen Ji, Ting Wang, Wei He, Yuhao Wan, Min Zeng, Di Guo, Lingling Cui, Hua Wang
{"title":"Frailty in older adults patients: a prospective observational cohort study on subtype identification.","authors":"Zhikai Yang, Chen Ji, Ting Wang, Wei He, Yuhao Wan, Min Zeng, Di Guo, Lingling Cui, Hua Wang","doi":"10.1186/s40001-025-02450-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>While the FRAIL scale has been used in primary care, cluster analysis on frail patients in a hospital setting has not been performed.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To identify potential subtypes of frail patients, and develop a simple, clinically applicable model for improved patient management.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The study included 214 frail patients aged 65 and above who were hospitalized in a hospital in Beijing from September 2018 to April 2019. This study applied the K-means clustering algorithm to analyze 27 variables, determining the optimal cluster number using the Elbow method and Silhouette coefficient. Key variables for predictive modeling were identified through LASSO (least absolute shrinkage and selection operator) regression, SVM-RFE (support vector machine-recursive feature elimination), and random forest techniques. A logistic regression model was then developed to predict patient subtypes, aimed at enhancing clinical identification and management of frailty subtypes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Clustering analysis distinguished two unique subgroups among the frail patients, revealing significant disparities in clinical characteristics and survival outcomes. One-year survival rates for Class 1 and Class 2 were 62.51% and 47.51%, respectively. The logistic regression model exhibited robust predictive capability, with an AUC (Area under curve) of 0.88. Validation through 1000 bootstrap resamples confirmed the model's reliability, with an average AUC of 0.8707 and a 95% CI (Confidence intervals) of 0.8572 to 0.8792.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study identifies two frailty subtypes in a hospital setting using unsupervised machine learning, demonstrating significant differences in survival outcomes. Clinical Trial registration ChiCTR1800017204; date of reqistration: 07/18/2018.</p>","PeriodicalId":11949,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Medical Research","volume":"30 1","pages":"336"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12036271/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Medical Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40001-025-02450-5","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: While the FRAIL scale has been used in primary care, cluster analysis on frail patients in a hospital setting has not been performed.

Objectives: To identify potential subtypes of frail patients, and develop a simple, clinically applicable model for improved patient management.

Methods: The study included 214 frail patients aged 65 and above who were hospitalized in a hospital in Beijing from September 2018 to April 2019. This study applied the K-means clustering algorithm to analyze 27 variables, determining the optimal cluster number using the Elbow method and Silhouette coefficient. Key variables for predictive modeling were identified through LASSO (least absolute shrinkage and selection operator) regression, SVM-RFE (support vector machine-recursive feature elimination), and random forest techniques. A logistic regression model was then developed to predict patient subtypes, aimed at enhancing clinical identification and management of frailty subtypes.

Results: Clustering analysis distinguished two unique subgroups among the frail patients, revealing significant disparities in clinical characteristics and survival outcomes. One-year survival rates for Class 1 and Class 2 were 62.51% and 47.51%, respectively. The logistic regression model exhibited robust predictive capability, with an AUC (Area under curve) of 0.88. Validation through 1000 bootstrap resamples confirmed the model's reliability, with an average AUC of 0.8707 and a 95% CI (Confidence intervals) of 0.8572 to 0.8792.

Conclusions: This study identifies two frailty subtypes in a hospital setting using unsupervised machine learning, demonstrating significant differences in survival outcomes. Clinical Trial registration ChiCTR1800017204; date of reqistration: 07/18/2018.

老年衰弱患者:一项亚型鉴定的前瞻性观察队列研究。
背景:虽然虚弱量表已用于初级保健,但尚未对医院环境中的虚弱患者进行聚类分析。目的:识别潜在的虚弱患者亚型,并建立一种简单、临床适用的模型,以改善患者管理。方法:研究对象为2018年9月至2019年4月在北京某医院住院的214例65岁及以上体弱患者。本研究采用K-means聚类算法对27个变量进行分析,采用肘部法和廓形系数确定最优聚类数。通过LASSO(最小绝对收缩和选择算子)回归、SVM-RFE(支持向量机递归特征消除)和随机森林技术确定预测建模的关键变量。然后建立了一个逻辑回归模型来预测患者亚型,旨在加强虚弱亚型的临床识别和管理。结果:聚类分析在虚弱患者中区分出两个独特的亚组,揭示了临床特征和生存结局的显著差异。1类和2类的1年生存率分别为62.51%和47.51%。logistic回归模型具有较强的预测能力,曲线下面积(AUC)为0.88。通过1000个bootstrap样本的验证证实了模型的可靠性,平均AUC为0.8707,95% CI(置信区间)为0.8572至0.8792。结论:本研究使用无监督机器学习在医院环境中确定了两种虚弱亚型,证明了生存结果的显着差异。临床试验注册ChiCTR1800017204;注册日期:2018/07/18。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
European Journal of Medical Research
European Journal of Medical Research 医学-医学:研究与实验
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
247
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: European Journal of Medical Research publishes translational and clinical research of international interest across all medical disciplines, enabling clinicians and other researchers to learn about developments and innovations within these disciplines and across the boundaries between disciplines. The journal publishes high quality research and reviews and aims to ensure that the results of all well-conducted research are published, regardless of their outcome.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信