The effect of surface treatments on the bond strength of polyetheretherketone posts: a systematic review protocol.

Q2 Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics

F1000Research Pub Date : 2025-04-03 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.12688/f1000research.154750.3

Hanen Boukhris, Aymen Ben Hadj Khalifa, Hayet Hajjami, Souha Boudegga Ben Youssef

{"title":"The effect of surface treatments on the bond strength of polyetheretherketone posts: a systematic review protocol.","authors":"Hanen Boukhris, Aymen Ben Hadj Khalifa, Hayet Hajjami, Souha Boudegga Ben Youssef","doi":"10.12688/f1000research.154750.3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Polyetheretherketone (PEEK) is widely used in the biomedical field due to its outstanding biological and mechanical properties. Originally employed as a temporary abutment in implantology, recent research has expanded its indications for more definitive applications, such as frameworks and dental post and core. However, PEEK's inert nature and low surface energy pose challenges for adhesion, necessitating surface modifications. Various physical and chemical modification techniques, including acid etching (e.g., 98% sulfuric acid), sandblasting with alumina oxide (Al₂O₃), plasma treatment, laser irradiation, silanization, and air abrasion with silica-coated particles, have been proposed to enhance PEEK's bonding performance. Despite numerous clinical investigations, standardized protocols for surface treatment remain lacking. This systematic review aims to assess the impact of surface treatments on the bonding performance of PEEK posts.Methods: A detailed search of the literature will be conducted across several databases including PubMed, Scopus and clinical trial registries. Additional databases such as Cochrane Central, EMBASE, Web of Science and EBSCO will also be included. The search strategy will target controlled randomized studies and non-randomized clinical trials evaluating the impact of surface treatments on PEEK post adhesion strength. The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) will be used to assess bias in non-randomized studies, while the Cochrane Risk of Bias (ROB II) tool will be employed for evaluating randomized controlled trials. Data extraction will focus on study design, treatment methods, outcomes and results.This systematic review protocol will adhere to the guidelines for systematic reviews outlined in the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA).Discussion: The discussion will explore the implications of findings on clinical practice, highlighting the importance of enhancing PEEK's bioactivity and surface energy to improve bonding efficacy in dental procedures. Moreover, it will suggest areas for future research to advance dental materials science, aiming to optimize the utilization of PEEK in dental applications.Systematic review registration: PROSPERO: CRD42024529783 (Registered on 08/04/2024).","PeriodicalId":12260,"journal":{"name":"F1000Research","volume":"13 ","pages":"951"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12008716/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"F1000Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.154750.3","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Polyetheretherketone (PEEK) is widely used in the biomedical field due to its outstanding biological and mechanical properties. Originally employed as a temporary abutment in implantology, recent research has expanded its indications for more definitive applications, such as frameworks and dental post and core. However, PEEK's inert nature and low surface energy pose challenges for adhesion, necessitating surface modifications. Various physical and chemical modification techniques, including acid etching (e.g., 98% sulfuric acid), sandblasting with alumina oxide (Al₂O₃), plasma treatment, laser irradiation, silanization, and air abrasion with silica-coated particles, have been proposed to enhance PEEK's bonding performance. Despite numerous clinical investigations, standardized protocols for surface treatment remain lacking. This systematic review aims to assess the impact of surface treatments on the bonding performance of PEEK posts.

Methods: A detailed search of the literature will be conducted across several databases including PubMed, Scopus and clinical trial registries. Additional databases such as Cochrane Central, EMBASE, Web of Science and EBSCO will also be included. The search strategy will target controlled randomized studies and non-randomized clinical trials evaluating the impact of surface treatments on PEEK post adhesion strength. The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) will be used to assess bias in non-randomized studies, while the Cochrane Risk of Bias (ROB II) tool will be employed for evaluating randomized controlled trials. Data extraction will focus on study design, treatment methods, outcomes and results.This systematic review protocol will adhere to the guidelines for systematic reviews outlined in the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA).

Discussion: The discussion will explore the implications of findings on clinical practice, highlighting the importance of enhancing PEEK's bioactivity and surface energy to improve bonding efficacy in dental procedures. Moreover, it will suggest areas for future research to advance dental materials science, aiming to optimize the utilization of PEEK in dental applications.

Systematic review registration: PROSPERO: CRD42024529783 (Registered on 08/04/2024).

查看原文本刊更多论文

表面处理对聚醚醚酮桩结合强度的影响：系统评价方案。

背景：聚醚醚酮（PEEK）因其优异的生物力学性能而广泛应用于生物医学领域。最初用作种植学中的临时基台，最近的研究已将其适应症扩展到更明确的应用，例如框架和牙科桩核。然而，PEEK的惰性性质和低表面能给粘合带来了挑战，因此需要进行表面改性。已经提出了各种物理和化学改性技术，包括酸蚀刻（例如98%硫酸）、氧化氧化铝（Al₂O₃）喷砂、等离子体处理、激光照射、硅烷化和二氧化硅涂层颗粒的空气磨损，以提高PEEK的粘合性能。尽管进行了大量的临床研究，表面处理的标准化方案仍然缺乏。本系统综述旨在评估表面处理对PEEK桩的粘合性能的影响。方法：对包括PubMed、Scopus和临床试验注册在内的多个数据库进行详细的文献检索。其他数据库如Cochrane Central、EMBASE、Web of Science和EBSCO也将包括在内。搜索策略将针对对照随机研究和非随机临床试验，评估表面处理对PEEK后粘附强度的影响。纽卡斯尔-渥太华量表（NOS）用于评估非随机研究的偏倚，Cochrane风险偏倚（ROB II）工具用于评估随机对照试验。数据提取将侧重于研究设计、治疗方法、结果和结果。本系统评价方案将遵循系统评价和荟萃分析首选报告项目（PRISMA）中概述的系统评价指南。讨论：讨论将探讨研究结果对临床实践的影响，强调提高PEEK的生物活性和表面能对提高牙科手术中的粘合效果的重要性。并提出了未来牙科材料科学的研究方向，旨在优化PEEK在牙科应用中的应用。系统评价注册：PROSPERO: CRD42024529783（注册日期为2024年8月4日）。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

F1000Research Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics-Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics (all)

CiteScore

5.00

自引率

0.00%

发文量

1646

审稿时长

1 weeks

期刊介绍： F1000Research publishes articles and other research outputs reporting basic scientific, scholarly, translational and clinical research across the physical and life sciences, engineering, medicine, social sciences and humanities. F1000Research is a scholarly publication platform set up for the scientific, scholarly and medical research community; each article has at least one author who is a qualified researcher, scholar or clinician actively working in their speciality and who has made a key contribution to the article. Articles must be original (not duplications). All research is suitable irrespective of the perceived level of interest or novelty; we welcome confirmatory and negative results, as well as null studies. F1000Research publishes different type of research, including clinical trials, systematic reviews, software tools, method articles, and many others. Reviews and Opinion articles providing a balanced and comprehensive overview of the latest discoveries in a particular field, or presenting a personal perspective on recent developments, are also welcome. See the full list of article types we accept for more information.