Angelica Tiotiu, Fulvio Braido, Krysztof Kowal, Guillermo Guidos Fogelbach, Herberto Chong Neto, Juan Carlos Ivancevich, Daniela Muti, Francisco-Javier Gonzalez-Barcala, Paschalis Steiropoulos, Silviya Novakova, Denislava Nedeva, Plamena Novakova, Stefan Mihaicuta, Jonathan Bernstein, Arzu Yorgancioglu, Pierachille Santus, Andras Bikov, Giorgio Walter Canonica, Charles Pilette
{"title":"Questionnaire for Clinical Diagnosis of House Dust Mite's Allergy Approved by Delphi Consensus.","authors":"Angelica Tiotiu, Fulvio Braido, Krysztof Kowal, Guillermo Guidos Fogelbach, Herberto Chong Neto, Juan Carlos Ivancevich, Daniela Muti, Francisco-Javier Gonzalez-Barcala, Paschalis Steiropoulos, Silviya Novakova, Denislava Nedeva, Plamena Novakova, Stefan Mihaicuta, Jonathan Bernstein, Arzu Yorgancioglu, Pierachille Santus, Andras Bikov, Giorgio Walter Canonica, Charles Pilette","doi":"10.1007/s12016-025-09055-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Despite house dust mite (HDM)-allergy is the most frequent in the world, no standard questionnaire exists to help physicians in their clinical practice for screening patients with this possible diagnosis. The objective of this survey was to develop a questionnaire that could be used to identify patients with suspicion of HDM-allergy. The survey was conducted using the Delphi methodology. Nineteen international experts in allergology constituted the scientific board who established the items included in the first version of the questionnaire, defined the criteria of the selection for the next steps, and validated the final questionnaire and its interpretation. The initial version of the questionnaire included 15 items. For each item, five answers were suggested graduated by scores from \"no importance\" to \"very high importance.\" The predefined conditions for the item selection after each round were a median score ≥ 7 and > 50% of responses according \"high importance\" and \"very high importance.\" The electronic survey circulated within the Interasma Scientific Network platform. Eight questions based on the occurrence/worsening of symptoms induced by HDM-allergen exposure meet the survey criteria after the second and the third rounds and were included in the final questionnaire. Binomial answers for each question with 1 point accorded for \"Yes\" and none for \"No\" were suggested for the final version with a score ≥ 5 points associated with a high probability for HDM-allergy. By applying the Delphi process, we generated a brief questionnaire with binomial answers, easy to use in clinical practice for screening patients with HDM-allergy.</p>","PeriodicalId":10423,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Reviews in Allergy & Immunology","volume":"68 1","pages":"45"},"PeriodicalIF":11.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Reviews in Allergy & Immunology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12016-025-09055-0","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ALLERGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Despite house dust mite (HDM)-allergy is the most frequent in the world, no standard questionnaire exists to help physicians in their clinical practice for screening patients with this possible diagnosis. The objective of this survey was to develop a questionnaire that could be used to identify patients with suspicion of HDM-allergy. The survey was conducted using the Delphi methodology. Nineteen international experts in allergology constituted the scientific board who established the items included in the first version of the questionnaire, defined the criteria of the selection for the next steps, and validated the final questionnaire and its interpretation. The initial version of the questionnaire included 15 items. For each item, five answers were suggested graduated by scores from "no importance" to "very high importance." The predefined conditions for the item selection after each round were a median score ≥ 7 and > 50% of responses according "high importance" and "very high importance." The electronic survey circulated within the Interasma Scientific Network platform. Eight questions based on the occurrence/worsening of symptoms induced by HDM-allergen exposure meet the survey criteria after the second and the third rounds and were included in the final questionnaire. Binomial answers for each question with 1 point accorded for "Yes" and none for "No" were suggested for the final version with a score ≥ 5 points associated with a high probability for HDM-allergy. By applying the Delphi process, we generated a brief questionnaire with binomial answers, easy to use in clinical practice for screening patients with HDM-allergy.
期刊介绍:
Clinical Reviews in Allergy & Immunology is a scholarly journal that focuses on the advancement of clinical management in allergic and immunologic diseases. The journal publishes both scholarly reviews and experimental papers that address the current state of managing these diseases, placing new data into perspective. Each issue of the journal is dedicated to a specific theme of critical importance to allergists and immunologists, aiming to provide a comprehensive understanding of the subject matter for a wide readership.
The journal is particularly helpful in explaining how novel data impacts clinical management, along with advancements such as standardized protocols for allergy skin testing and challenge procedures, as well as improved understanding of cell biology. Ultimately, the journal aims to contribute to the improvement of care and management for patients with immune-mediated diseases.