Blood pressure management in the first 24 hours for intracerebral hemorrhage patients on oral anticoagulant therapy.

IF 2.2 4区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Current Medical Research and Opinion Pub Date : 2025-04-01 Epub Date: 2025-05-02 DOI:10.1080/03007995.2025.2495853
Lindsey Selph, Teresa A Allison, Sophie Samuel
{"title":"Blood pressure management in the first 24 hours for intracerebral hemorrhage patients on oral anticoagulant therapy.","authors":"Lindsey Selph, Teresa A Allison, Sophie Samuel","doi":"10.1080/03007995.2025.2495853","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To investigate the differences in blood pressure (BP) management and outcomes between intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) patients on oral anticoagulant (OAC) therapy compared to those not on OAC therapy within the first 24 h of hospital admission.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective cohort study included 165 ICH patients admitted to a comprehensive stroke center between July 1, 2014 and June 30, 2021. Patients were divided into two groups: those on OAC therapy (<i>n</i> = 55) and those not on OAC therapy (<i>n</i> = 110). BP measurements, including systolic BP (SBP) within 24 h of post-admission, were recorded. Clinical outcomes, such as mortality, modified Rankin Scale (mRS) scores, and length of hospital stay, were assessed. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis and Cox proportional hazards regression were used to evaluate the impact of BP management on patient outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>No significant differences in overall survival were observed between the OAC and non-OAC groups. Although the mean SBP at 24 h was slightly higher in the OAC group (142 mmHg) compared to the non-OAC group (136 mmHg; <i>p</i> = 0.032), this did not translate into differences in mortality or functional outcomes. Higher ICH scores were associated with increased mortality risk (HR 2.01, 95% CI 1.29-3.12, <i>p</i> = 0.002). Higher GCS scores were associated with better functional outcomes (HR 0.92, 95% CI 0.85-0.99, <i>p</i> = 0.035), while BP management strategies did not show a significant impact.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>BP management in the first 24 h for ICH patients on OAC may not significantly affect mortality or functional outcomes. Current BP management strategies may be applicable to both OAC and non-OAC patients, though further research is needed to explore tailored approaches.</p>","PeriodicalId":10814,"journal":{"name":"Current Medical Research and Opinion","volume":" ","pages":"733-740"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Medical Research and Opinion","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/03007995.2025.2495853","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/5/2 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To investigate the differences in blood pressure (BP) management and outcomes between intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) patients on oral anticoagulant (OAC) therapy compared to those not on OAC therapy within the first 24 h of hospital admission.

Methods: This retrospective cohort study included 165 ICH patients admitted to a comprehensive stroke center between July 1, 2014 and June 30, 2021. Patients were divided into two groups: those on OAC therapy (n = 55) and those not on OAC therapy (n = 110). BP measurements, including systolic BP (SBP) within 24 h of post-admission, were recorded. Clinical outcomes, such as mortality, modified Rankin Scale (mRS) scores, and length of hospital stay, were assessed. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis and Cox proportional hazards regression were used to evaluate the impact of BP management on patient outcomes.

Results: No significant differences in overall survival were observed between the OAC and non-OAC groups. Although the mean SBP at 24 h was slightly higher in the OAC group (142 mmHg) compared to the non-OAC group (136 mmHg; p = 0.032), this did not translate into differences in mortality or functional outcomes. Higher ICH scores were associated with increased mortality risk (HR 2.01, 95% CI 1.29-3.12, p = 0.002). Higher GCS scores were associated with better functional outcomes (HR 0.92, 95% CI 0.85-0.99, p = 0.035), while BP management strategies did not show a significant impact.

Conclusion: BP management in the first 24 h for ICH patients on OAC may not significantly affect mortality or functional outcomes. Current BP management strategies may be applicable to both OAC and non-OAC patients, though further research is needed to explore tailored approaches.

脑出血患者口服抗凝治疗前24小时血压管理。
目的:探讨颅内出血(ICH)患者入院后24小时内口服抗凝剂(OAC)治疗与未口服抗凝剂治疗的血压(BP)管理和预后的差异。方法:本回顾性队列研究纳入了2014年7月1日至2021年6月30日在综合卒中中心住院的165例脑出血患者。患者分为两组:接受OAC治疗的患者(n = 55)和未接受OAC治疗的患者(n = 110)。记录入院后24小时内的血压测量,包括收缩压(SBP)。评估临床结果,如死亡率、改良兰金量表(mRS)评分和住院时间。使用Kaplan-Meier生存分析和Cox比例风险回归来评估血压管理对患者预后的影响。结果:OAC组与非OAC组的总生存率无显著差异。尽管OAC组24小时的平均收缩压(142 mmHg)略高于非OAC组(136 mmHg;P = 0.032),但这并没有转化为死亡率或功能结局的差异。脑出血评分越高,死亡风险越高(HR 2.01, 95% CI 1.29-3.12, p = 0.002)。较高的GCS评分与较好的功能结局相关(HR 0.92, 95% CI 0.85-0.99, p = 0.035),而BP管理策略没有显示出显著影响。结论:脑出血患者接受OAC治疗前24小时的血压管理可能不会显著影响死亡率或功能结局。目前的血压管理策略可能适用于OAC和非OAC患者,但需要进一步的研究来探索量身定制的方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Current Medical Research and Opinion
Current Medical Research and Opinion 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
4.30%
发文量
247
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Current Medical Research and Opinion is a MEDLINE-indexed, peer-reviewed, international journal for the rapid publication of original research on new and existing drugs and therapies, Phase II-IV studies, and post-marketing investigations. Equivalence, safety and efficacy/effectiveness studies are especially encouraged. Preclinical, Phase I, pharmacoeconomic, outcomes and quality of life studies may also be considered if there is clear clinical relevance
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信