Shahin Hallaj, Bahram Pashaee, Christian J Nieves, Sagar J Shah, Sopuruchukwu Ezeonu, Tina Xia, Ananya Garg, Young Sheng, Elizabeth A Dale, Courtland Schmidt, Aakriti G Shukla, Michael J Pro, Natasha N Kolomeyer, Daniel Lee, Marlene R Moster, Jonathan S Myers, Reza Razeghinejad
{"title":"Comparison of outcomes of continuous-wave and micropulse trans-scleral cyclophotocoagulation: A retrospective cohort study.","authors":"Shahin Hallaj, Bahram Pashaee, Christian J Nieves, Sagar J Shah, Sopuruchukwu Ezeonu, Tina Xia, Ananya Garg, Young Sheng, Elizabeth A Dale, Courtland Schmidt, Aakriti G Shukla, Michael J Pro, Natasha N Kolomeyer, Daniel Lee, Marlene R Moster, Jonathan S Myers, Reza Razeghinejad","doi":"10.1177/11206721251332674","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>PurposeThis study aimed to compare and provide data on the outcomes of continuous wave (CWCPC) and micropulse transscleral cyclophotocoagulation (MPCPC).MethodsThis was a retrospective cohort study of 130 glaucomatous eyes that underwent CWCPC with a minimum 6-month follow-up matched 1:1 with 130 eyes that underwent MPCPC. The main outcome measure was CPC failure, defined as intraocular pressure (IOP) reduction of <20%, therapy advancement, or progression to no light perception. The secondary outcome measure was safety profile and complications.ResultsThe mean age of patients in the CWCPC and MPCPC groups was 64.4 ± 16.4 and 64.0 ± 17.2 years, respectively. Most patients were male (56.5%), and 48.5% were White. Primary open-angle glaucoma was the most common glaucoma diagnosis (40.4%), 58.5% of the patients had severe glaucoma. Mean preoperative IOP and number of medications were 29.8 ± 10.6 mmHg and 3.7 ± 1.3, respectively. The failure rates at 6 months (46.9% vs. 18.5%) and 1 year (61.5% vs. 40.8%) were higher in MPCPC group (<i>p</i> = 0.001). Mean IOP reduction was slightly greater in the CWCPC group (15.1 ± 13.9 mmHg vs. 14.2 ± 10.4, <i>p</i> = 0.5). Lower laser energy (HR:0.995) and MPCPC (HR:1.698) were associated with higher risk of failure (<i>p</i> = 0.002). The complication rate was higher in the CWCPC group (13.8% vs. 4.6%, <i>p</i> < 0.001); vision loss occurred more in the CWCPC group (4.6% vs. 2.3%), and the only phthisis bulbi occurred in one of the eyes of CWCPC group.ConclusionCWCPC was more effective in lowering the IOP despite delivering less total energy than MPCPC but had a higher rate of complications.</p>","PeriodicalId":12000,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Ophthalmology","volume":" ","pages":"1647-1653"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12276928/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Ophthalmology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/11206721251332674","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/4/15 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
PurposeThis study aimed to compare and provide data on the outcomes of continuous wave (CWCPC) and micropulse transscleral cyclophotocoagulation (MPCPC).MethodsThis was a retrospective cohort study of 130 glaucomatous eyes that underwent CWCPC with a minimum 6-month follow-up matched 1:1 with 130 eyes that underwent MPCPC. The main outcome measure was CPC failure, defined as intraocular pressure (IOP) reduction of <20%, therapy advancement, or progression to no light perception. The secondary outcome measure was safety profile and complications.ResultsThe mean age of patients in the CWCPC and MPCPC groups was 64.4 ± 16.4 and 64.0 ± 17.2 years, respectively. Most patients were male (56.5%), and 48.5% were White. Primary open-angle glaucoma was the most common glaucoma diagnosis (40.4%), 58.5% of the patients had severe glaucoma. Mean preoperative IOP and number of medications were 29.8 ± 10.6 mmHg and 3.7 ± 1.3, respectively. The failure rates at 6 months (46.9% vs. 18.5%) and 1 year (61.5% vs. 40.8%) were higher in MPCPC group (p = 0.001). Mean IOP reduction was slightly greater in the CWCPC group (15.1 ± 13.9 mmHg vs. 14.2 ± 10.4, p = 0.5). Lower laser energy (HR:0.995) and MPCPC (HR:1.698) were associated with higher risk of failure (p = 0.002). The complication rate was higher in the CWCPC group (13.8% vs. 4.6%, p < 0.001); vision loss occurred more in the CWCPC group (4.6% vs. 2.3%), and the only phthisis bulbi occurred in one of the eyes of CWCPC group.ConclusionCWCPC was more effective in lowering the IOP despite delivering less total energy than MPCPC but had a higher rate of complications.
目的比较连续波法(CWCPC)和微脉冲经巩膜光凝法(MPCPC)的治疗效果。方法本研究是一项回顾性队列研究,130只青光眼接受了CWCPC,随访至少6个月,与130只接受MPCPC的眼睛进行了1:1的匹配。主要结局指标为CPC失败,定义为眼压(IOP)降低(p = 0.001)。CWCPC组平均IOP降低幅度略大(15.1±13.9 mmHg vs. 14.2±10.4,p = 0.5)。较低的激光能量(HR:0.995)和MPCPC (HR:1.698)与较高的失败风险相关(p = 0.002)。CWCPC组并发症发生率较高(13.8% vs. 4.6%, p
期刊介绍:
The European Journal of Ophthalmology was founded in 1991 and is issued in print bi-monthly. It publishes only peer-reviewed original research reporting clinical observations and laboratory investigations with clinical relevance focusing on new diagnostic and surgical techniques, instrument and therapy updates, results of clinical trials and research findings.