Optimal MGMT promoter methylation cut-off to predict better survival in glioblastoma patients undergoing gross-total resection.

IF 1.3 4区 医学 Q4 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Claudia Fanizzi, Petra Bintintan-Socaciu, Elena Pirola, Giorgio Fiore, Ilaria Carnicelli, Leonardo Tariciotti, Andrea Parlangeli, Elena Scagliotti, Silvia M Tabano, Gianluca Lopez, Stefano Ferrero, Stefania Navone, Laura Guarnaccia, Giovanni Marfia, Manuela Caroli, Marco Locatelli
{"title":"Optimal MGMT promoter methylation cut-off to predict better survival in glioblastoma patients undergoing gross-total resection.","authors":"Claudia Fanizzi, Petra Bintintan-Socaciu, Elena Pirola, Giorgio Fiore, Ilaria Carnicelli, Leonardo Tariciotti, Andrea Parlangeli, Elena Scagliotti, Silvia M Tabano, Gianluca Lopez, Stefano Ferrero, Stefania Navone, Laura Guarnaccia, Giovanni Marfia, Manuela Caroli, Marco Locatelli","doi":"10.23736/S0390-5616.25.06421-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>O6-Methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase (MGMT) promoter percentage of methylation in gliomas has been proved to be the most important predictive factor in temozolomide (TMZ) response. Nevertheless, an agreement about the cut-off to discriminate between a \"methylated\" and \"unmethylated\" status has not been reached yet. Many reports have analyzed the correlation between methylated status cut-off and survival, but they lacked sample homogeneity. Our aim was to calculate a clinical significant cut-off considering a homogenous group of patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We retrospectively analyzed 96 patients who underwent a complete removal of glioblastoma in our Institution. All the patients underwent to radiation therapy plus concomitant TMZ and twelve cycles of adjuvant TMZ as described by Stupp. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was performed and 21% was determined as the optimal cut-off.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The median OS was significantly higher in methylated patients compared to unmethylated ones (median 48 months vs 22 months respectively 95% CI 30-42 vs. 15-19, P<0.001). No difference was observed for PFS. The multivariate analysis with Cox regression model identified MGMT methylation status as an independent predictive factor for OS (P<0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>We confirmed the prognostic role of MGMT methylation status even in a highly selective group of patients with the best outcome. We calculated a cut-off of 21% to be highly predictable of survival.</p>","PeriodicalId":16504,"journal":{"name":"Journal of neurosurgical sciences","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of neurosurgical sciences","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23736/S0390-5616.25.06421-5","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: O6-Methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase (MGMT) promoter percentage of methylation in gliomas has been proved to be the most important predictive factor in temozolomide (TMZ) response. Nevertheless, an agreement about the cut-off to discriminate between a "methylated" and "unmethylated" status has not been reached yet. Many reports have analyzed the correlation between methylated status cut-off and survival, but they lacked sample homogeneity. Our aim was to calculate a clinical significant cut-off considering a homogenous group of patients.

Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 96 patients who underwent a complete removal of glioblastoma in our Institution. All the patients underwent to radiation therapy plus concomitant TMZ and twelve cycles of adjuvant TMZ as described by Stupp. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was performed and 21% was determined as the optimal cut-off.

Results: The median OS was significantly higher in methylated patients compared to unmethylated ones (median 48 months vs 22 months respectively 95% CI 30-42 vs. 15-19, P<0.001). No difference was observed for PFS. The multivariate analysis with Cox regression model identified MGMT methylation status as an independent predictive factor for OS (P<0.001).

Conclusions: We confirmed the prognostic role of MGMT methylation status even in a highly selective group of patients with the best outcome. We calculated a cut-off of 21% to be highly predictable of survival.

最佳MGMT启动子甲基化截止预测胶质母细胞瘤患者接受总全切除的更好生存率。
背景:胶质瘤中o6 -甲基鸟嘌呤- dna甲基转移酶(MGMT)启动子甲基化百分比已被证明是替莫唑胺(TMZ)反应最重要的预测因素。然而,关于区分“甲基化”和“非甲基化”状态的分界点的协议尚未达成。许多报告分析了甲基化状态截止和生存之间的相关性,但缺乏样本同质性。我们的目的是在考虑同质组患者的情况下计算临床显著截止值。方法:我们回顾性分析了我院96例完全切除胶质母细胞瘤的患者。根据Stupp的描述,所有患者均接受放疗加TMZ和12个周期的辅助TMZ治疗。进行受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线分析,确定21%为最佳截止值。结果:与未甲基化患者相比,甲基化患者的中位OS显著高于未甲基化患者(中位OS分别为48个月和22个月,95% CI分别为30-42和15-19)。结论:我们证实了MGMT甲基化状态的预后作用,即使是在具有最佳结果的高度选择性患者组中。我们计算出21%的临界值是高度可预测的生存率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of neurosurgical sciences
Journal of neurosurgical sciences CLINICAL NEUROLOGY-SURGERY
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
5.30%
发文量
202
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Neurosurgical Sciences publishes scientific papers on neurosurgery and related subjects (electroencephalography, neurophysiology, neurochemistry, neuropathology, stereotaxy, neuroanatomy, neuroradiology, etc.). Manuscripts may be submitted in the form of ditorials, original articles, review articles, special articles, letters to the Editor and guidelines. The journal aims to provide its readers with papers of the highest quality and impact through a process of careful peer review and editorial work.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信