Psychometric assessment of the Chinese version of the Near Activity Visual Questionnaire in presbyopia using Rasch analysis.

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q2 OPHTHALMOLOGY
Yuecheng Ren, Jiawei Li, Xinyu Jiang, Jyoti Khadka, Yiran Wang, Chenfeng Gu, Yue Wu, Qinmei Wang, Jinhai Huang, Rongrong Gao
{"title":"Psychometric assessment of the Chinese version of the Near Activity Visual Questionnaire in presbyopia using Rasch analysis.","authors":"Yuecheng Ren, Jiawei Li, Xinyu Jiang, Jyoti Khadka, Yiran Wang, Chenfeng Gu, Yue Wu, Qinmei Wang, Jinhai Huang, Rongrong Gao","doi":"10.1097/j.jcrs.0000000000001675","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To evaluate the psychometric properties of the Chinese version of the Near Activity Visual Questionnaire (NAVQ).</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>XXX.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Randomization single-center observational study.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The original English version of the NAVQ was translated and cross-culturally adapted into Mandarin. Participants with presbyopia completed the NAVQ. Clinical data, including monocular and binocular habitual near visual acuity (HNVA), manifest refraction spherical power, cylindrical power and near addition (ADD) were collected. The NAVQ was psychometrically assessed using Rasch analysis metrics. The criterion validity was evaluated by correlating the Rasch score with clinical data.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>One hundred and seventy-five participants with presbyopia (median age: 65 years old, female: 42.9%) were included. Rasch analysis demonstrated that the NAVQ was unidimensional, with ordered thresholds, good measurement precision (person separation measure: 2.86), and acceptable targeting (0.99 logit). The NAVQ Rasch score correlated strongly with binocular HNVA ( rs = 0.678) compared to better-eye and worse-eye VA. It also showed moderate correlations with additional power ( rs = 0.523), and the spherical equivalent for presbyopia correction in the better-eye ( rs = 0.656) and worse-eye ( rs = 0.647) (all P < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The Chinese version of the NAVQ demonstrated good psychometric properties and validity in a Chinese presbyopia population.</p>","PeriodicalId":15214,"journal":{"name":"Journal of cataract and refractive surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of cataract and refractive surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/j.jcrs.0000000000001675","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate the psychometric properties of the Chinese version of the Near Activity Visual Questionnaire (NAVQ).

Setting: XXX.

Design: Randomization single-center observational study.

Methods: The original English version of the NAVQ was translated and cross-culturally adapted into Mandarin. Participants with presbyopia completed the NAVQ. Clinical data, including monocular and binocular habitual near visual acuity (HNVA), manifest refraction spherical power, cylindrical power and near addition (ADD) were collected. The NAVQ was psychometrically assessed using Rasch analysis metrics. The criterion validity was evaluated by correlating the Rasch score with clinical data.

Results: One hundred and seventy-five participants with presbyopia (median age: 65 years old, female: 42.9%) were included. Rasch analysis demonstrated that the NAVQ was unidimensional, with ordered thresholds, good measurement precision (person separation measure: 2.86), and acceptable targeting (0.99 logit). The NAVQ Rasch score correlated strongly with binocular HNVA ( rs = 0.678) compared to better-eye and worse-eye VA. It also showed moderate correlations with additional power ( rs = 0.523), and the spherical equivalent for presbyopia correction in the better-eye ( rs = 0.656) and worse-eye ( rs = 0.647) (all P < 0.001).

Conclusion: The Chinese version of the NAVQ demonstrated good psychometric properties and validity in a Chinese presbyopia population.

用Rasch分析法对中文版老花眼近活动视觉问卷进行心理测量评估。
目的:评价中文版近活动视觉问卷(NAVQ)的心理测量特性。设置:XXX。设计:随机单中心观察性研究。方法:对原英文版本的NAVQ进行翻译和跨文化改编。老花眼的参与者完成了NAVQ。收集临床资料,包括单眼和双眼习惯性近视力(HNVA)、明显屈光球度数、圆柱度数和近加法(ADD)。使用Rasch分析指标对NAVQ进行心理测量学评估。通过将皮疹评分与临床资料相关联来评估标准的效度。结果:纳入175例老花患者(中位年龄:65岁,女性:42.9%)。Rasch分析表明,NAVQ是一维的,阈值有序,测量精度好(人分离测量:2.86),可接受的目标(0.99 logit)。与好眼和差眼相比,NAVQ Rasch评分与双眼HNVA有较强的相关性(rs = 0.678),与附加度数(rs = 0.523)、好眼和差眼的球面等效度数(rs = 0.656)也有中度相关性(rs = 0.647) (P < 0.001)。结论:中文版NAVQ量表在中国老花眼人群中具有良好的心理测量特性和效度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
14.30%
发文量
259
审稿时长
8.5 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Cataract & Refractive Surgery (JCRS), a preeminent peer-reviewed monthly ophthalmology publication, is the official journal of the American Society of Cataract and Refractive Surgery (ASCRS) and the European Society of Cataract and Refractive Surgeons (ESCRS). JCRS publishes high quality articles on all aspects of anterior segment surgery. In addition to original clinical studies, the journal features a consultation section, practical techniques, important cases, and reviews as well as basic science articles.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信