Effectiveness and the synergism effects of Ipomoea cairica leaf plant extract and Metarhizium anisopliae fungi (Meta-G4) against larvae of Aedes aegypti Linnaeus and Aedes albopictus Skuse (Diptera: Culicidae).

IF 2.1 3区 农林科学 Q1 ENTOMOLOGY
Kin Hoong Ng, Wan Fatma Zuharah
{"title":"Effectiveness and the synergism effects of Ipomoea cairica leaf plant extract and Metarhizium anisopliae fungi (Meta-G4) against larvae of Aedes aegypti Linnaeus and Aedes albopictus Skuse (Diptera: Culicidae).","authors":"Kin Hoong Ng, Wan Fatma Zuharah","doi":"10.1093/jisesa/ieaf044","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Insecticide resistance is a major public health concern. Biopesticides, derived from naturally occurring substances such as plant extracts and fungal metabolites, are utilized as natural control agents against mosquito vectors. This study focuses on biopesticides to reduce chemical insecticide use in Penang Island, Malaysia. Ipomoea cairica Linnaeus Sweet (Solanales: Convolvulaceae) leaf extracts, Metarhizium anisopliae s.l. (Metsch) Sorok (Ascomycota: Clavicipitaceae) strain Meta-G4, and synergistic effects of both agents were demonstrated against Aedes albopictus Skuse (Diptera: Culicidae) and Aedes aegypti Linnaeus (Diptera: Culicidae) using larvicidal bioassays. Before assessing synergism, the compatibility of both agents was performed to minimize inhibition of mycelial growth on potato dextrose agar. The results showed that Ae. aegypti field strains (urban and suburban) are significantly more susceptible to I. cairica leaf extracts compared to Ae. albopictus field strains (urban and suburban) due to the lower lethal concentrations (LC50 and LC95). Aedes albopictus suburban field strain is significantly more susceptible than other strains when tested with M. anisopliae due to the lower LC50. The combination of M. anisopliae (1 × 106 conidia/ml) with I. cairica leaf extracts (350 ppm) achieved the lowest LT50 and LT95 against Ae. aegypti urban field strain. This study indicates that the synergistic combination of both agents exhibits significant larvicidal efficacy and holds promise for future biological control strategies targeting Aedes populations.</p>","PeriodicalId":16156,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Insect Science","volume":"25 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12070480/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Insect Science","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jisesa/ieaf044","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENTOMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Insecticide resistance is a major public health concern. Biopesticides, derived from naturally occurring substances such as plant extracts and fungal metabolites, are utilized as natural control agents against mosquito vectors. This study focuses on biopesticides to reduce chemical insecticide use in Penang Island, Malaysia. Ipomoea cairica Linnaeus Sweet (Solanales: Convolvulaceae) leaf extracts, Metarhizium anisopliae s.l. (Metsch) Sorok (Ascomycota: Clavicipitaceae) strain Meta-G4, and synergistic effects of both agents were demonstrated against Aedes albopictus Skuse (Diptera: Culicidae) and Aedes aegypti Linnaeus (Diptera: Culicidae) using larvicidal bioassays. Before assessing synergism, the compatibility of both agents was performed to minimize inhibition of mycelial growth on potato dextrose agar. The results showed that Ae. aegypti field strains (urban and suburban) are significantly more susceptible to I. cairica leaf extracts compared to Ae. albopictus field strains (urban and suburban) due to the lower lethal concentrations (LC50 and LC95). Aedes albopictus suburban field strain is significantly more susceptible than other strains when tested with M. anisopliae due to the lower LC50. The combination of M. anisopliae (1 × 106 conidia/ml) with I. cairica leaf extracts (350 ppm) achieved the lowest LT50 and LT95 against Ae. aegypti urban field strain. This study indicates that the synergistic combination of both agents exhibits significant larvicidal efficacy and holds promise for future biological control strategies targeting Aedes populations.

金龟子叶提取物与金龟子绿僵菌真菌(Meta-G4)对埃及伊蚊和白纹伊蚊幼虫的防效及增效作用
杀虫剂抗药性是一个主要的公共卫生问题。从植物提取物和真菌代谢物等天然存在的物质中提取的生物农药被用作蚊虫媒介的天然控制剂。本研究的重点是生物农药,以减少化学杀虫剂在马来西亚槟城岛的使用。采用杀幼虫生物测定的方法,研究了金龟子绿僵菌(Metarhizium anisopliae s.l, Metsch) Sorok(子囊菌科:Clavicipitaceae)菌株Meta-G4与金龟子绿僵菌(Ipomoea cairica Linnaeus)叶提取物对Skuse白纹伊蚊(双翅目:库蚊科)和egyptaedes Linnaeus(双翅目:库蚊科)的协同作用。在评估协同作用之前,进行了两种药剂的相容性,以尽量减少对马铃薯葡萄糖琼脂上菌丝生长的抑制。结果表明:Ae;埃及伊蚊田间品系(城市和郊区)对伊蚊叶提取物的敏感性明显高于伊蚊。由于致死浓度(LC50和LC95)较低,白纹伊蚊野外菌株(城市和郊区)。郊区白纹伊蚊野外菌株由于LC50较低,对绿僵菌的易感程度明显高于其他菌株。绿僵菌(1 × 106个分生孢子/ml)与山核桃叶提取物(350 ppm)组合对伊蚊的LT50和LT95最低。埃及伊蚊城市野外品系。该研究表明,这两种药剂的协同组合具有显著的杀幼虫效果,为未来针对伊蚊种群的生物防治策略提供了希望。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Insect Science
Journal of Insect Science 生物-昆虫学
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
80
审稿时长
7.5 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Insect Science was founded with support from the University of Arizona library in 2001 by Dr. Henry Hagedorn, who served as editor-in-chief until his death in January 2014. The Entomological Society of America was very pleased to add the Journal of Insect Science to its publishing portfolio in 2014. The fully open access journal publishes papers in all aspects of the biology of insects and other arthropods from the molecular to the ecological, and their agricultural and medical impact.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信