Headache-attributed burden and a health-care needs assessment in Delhi and National Capital Region of India: estimates from a cross-sectional population-based study.

IF 7.3 1区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Anand Krishnan, Debashish Chowdhury, Ashish Duggal, Ritvik Amarchand, Andreas Husøy, Timothy J Steiner
{"title":"Headache-attributed burden and a health-care needs assessment in Delhi and National Capital Region of India: estimates from a cross-sectional population-based study.","authors":"Anand Krishnan, Debashish Chowdhury, Ashish Duggal, Ritvik Amarchand, Andreas Husøy, Timothy J Steiner","doi":"10.1186/s10194-025-02036-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>We have previously shown headache to be highly prevalent in Delhi and National Capital Region of northern India, as we did earlier in Karnataka State in the south. Here we present a complementary study performed contemporaneously of headache-attributed burden, along with a population health-care needs assessment.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In a cross-sectional study using the standardised methodology of the Global Campaign against Headache, we randomly selected households, and one member aged 18-65 years from each, making unannounced visits. Trained interviewers used the HARDSHIP questionnaire incorporating enquiry into various aspects of headache-attributed burden: symptom burden, lost health, impaired participation in daily activities, quality of life (QoL) and willingness to pay (WTP) for treatment. Enquiry included questions about headache yesterday (HY).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of N = 2,066, participants reporting headache in the past year spent 9.5% of their time with headache of moderate intensity (1.8 on the scale of 1-3). Population-level estimates of all time spent with headache were in the range 5.5-6.6%. On this measure, migraine (8.2%) was, at individual level, much more burdensome than tension-type headache (TTH) (1.7%), and females with migraine or TTH were more burdened (8.7% and 2.0% respectively) than males (6.0% and 1.0%). Migraine accounted for substantial health loss (3.6%) at individual level (disability weights from the Global Burden of Disease study factored in), but both measures of overall burden (QoL and WTP) found it greatest among those with probable medication-overuse headache (pMOH) or other causes of headache on ≥ 15 days/month (H15+), with TTH least. For all headache types, participation was more impaired in household than in paid work, the latter being little affected (overall, males 0.3 lost days/month, females 0.1). Impaired participation in social or leisure activities was close to unmeasurably low. Impaired participation from HY was 1.8% across all domains of activity. One quarter (26%) of the population aged 18-65 years would be expected to benefit from health care, meeting our criteria for need: 16.1% with migraine, 6.4% with H15+.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Headache disorders in northern India are not only prevalent but also associated with high burden. One quarter of the adult population would benefit from professional headache care.</p>","PeriodicalId":16013,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Headache and Pain","volume":"26 1","pages":"106"},"PeriodicalIF":7.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12057160/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Headache and Pain","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s10194-025-02036-w","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: We have previously shown headache to be highly prevalent in Delhi and National Capital Region of northern India, as we did earlier in Karnataka State in the south. Here we present a complementary study performed contemporaneously of headache-attributed burden, along with a population health-care needs assessment.

Methods: In a cross-sectional study using the standardised methodology of the Global Campaign against Headache, we randomly selected households, and one member aged 18-65 years from each, making unannounced visits. Trained interviewers used the HARDSHIP questionnaire incorporating enquiry into various aspects of headache-attributed burden: symptom burden, lost health, impaired participation in daily activities, quality of life (QoL) and willingness to pay (WTP) for treatment. Enquiry included questions about headache yesterday (HY).

Results: Of N = 2,066, participants reporting headache in the past year spent 9.5% of their time with headache of moderate intensity (1.8 on the scale of 1-3). Population-level estimates of all time spent with headache were in the range 5.5-6.6%. On this measure, migraine (8.2%) was, at individual level, much more burdensome than tension-type headache (TTH) (1.7%), and females with migraine or TTH were more burdened (8.7% and 2.0% respectively) than males (6.0% and 1.0%). Migraine accounted for substantial health loss (3.6%) at individual level (disability weights from the Global Burden of Disease study factored in), but both measures of overall burden (QoL and WTP) found it greatest among those with probable medication-overuse headache (pMOH) or other causes of headache on ≥ 15 days/month (H15+), with TTH least. For all headache types, participation was more impaired in household than in paid work, the latter being little affected (overall, males 0.3 lost days/month, females 0.1). Impaired participation in social or leisure activities was close to unmeasurably low. Impaired participation from HY was 1.8% across all domains of activity. One quarter (26%) of the population aged 18-65 years would be expected to benefit from health care, meeting our criteria for need: 16.1% with migraine, 6.4% with H15+.

Conclusion: Headache disorders in northern India are not only prevalent but also associated with high burden. One quarter of the adult population would benefit from professional headache care.

印度德里和国家首都地区头痛引起的负担和保健需求评估:基于横断面人口研究的估计
背景:我们以前已经表明头痛在印度北部的德里和国家首都地区非常普遍,正如我们早些时候在南部的卡纳塔克邦所做的那样。在这里,我们提出了一项补充性研究,同时进行了头痛引起的负担,以及人口卫生保健需求评估。方法:在一项采用全球防治头痛运动标准化方法的横断面研究中,我们随机选择家庭,每个家庭中有一名18-65岁的成员,进行不事先通知的访问。训练有素的采访者使用困难程度调查表,对头痛引起的负担的各个方面进行调查:症状负担、健康状况下降、日常活动参与受损、生活质量(QoL)和支付治疗费用的意愿(WTP)。查询包括有关昨日头痛的问题。结果:在N = 2066的参与者中,在过去的一年中,报告头痛的参与者有9.5%的时间是中等强度的头痛(在1-3的范围内为1.8)。人群对头痛总时间的估计在5.5% -6.6%之间。在个体水平上,偏头痛(8.2%)比紧张性头痛(TTH)(1.7%)负担更重,女性偏头痛或TTH患者的负担(分别为8.7%和2.0%)比男性(6.0%和1.0%)更重。偏头痛在个体水平上造成了大量的健康损失(3.6%)(全球疾病负担研究中的残疾权重考虑在内),但总体负担(QoL和WTP)的两项测量都发现,在可能有药物过度使用头痛(pMOH)或其他原因的头痛≥15天/月(H15+)中,偏头痛最大,TTH最小。对于所有类型的头痛,家庭参与比有偿工作受到的影响更大,后者受到的影响很小(总体而言,男性每月损失0.3天,女性每月损失0.1天)。在社交或休闲活动中受损的参与率几乎低到无法衡量的程度。在所有活动领域中,HY的参与受损率为1.8%。年龄在18-65岁的人群中有四分之一(26%)有望从医疗保健中受益,符合我们的需求标准:偏头痛患者为16.1%,H15+患者为6.4%。结论:印度北部的头痛疾病不仅普遍,而且与高负担有关。四分之一的成年人将受益于专业的头痛治疗。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Headache and Pain
Journal of Headache and Pain 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
11.80
自引率
13.50%
发文量
143
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Headache and Pain, a peer-reviewed open-access journal published under the BMC brand, a part of Springer Nature, is dedicated to researchers engaged in all facets of headache and related pain syndromes. It encompasses epidemiology, public health, basic science, translational medicine, clinical trials, and real-world data. With a multidisciplinary approach, The Journal of Headache and Pain addresses headache medicine and related pain syndromes across all medical disciplines. It particularly encourages submissions in clinical, translational, and basic science fields, focusing on pain management, genetics, neurology, and internal medicine. The journal publishes research articles, reviews, letters to the Editor, as well as consensus articles and guidelines, aimed at promoting best practices in managing patients with headaches and related pain.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信