Esthetic and Functional Outcomes of Superficial Parotidectomy Comparing Three Reconstruction Techniques: An Interventional Clinical Study.

IF 1 Q3 OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY
International Archives of Otorhinolaryngology Pub Date : 2025-04-22 eCollection Date: 2025-04-01 DOI:10.1055/s-0044-1788911
Sherif Mohammad Askar, Abd ElRaof Said Mohamed, Tamer Oraby, Ibrahim Khaled, Mahmoud Megahed, Ali Awad
{"title":"Esthetic and Functional Outcomes of Superficial Parotidectomy Comparing Three Reconstruction Techniques: An Interventional Clinical Study.","authors":"Sherif Mohammad Askar, Abd ElRaof Said Mohamed, Tamer Oraby, Ibrahim Khaled, Mahmoud Megahed, Ali Awad","doi":"10.1055/s-0044-1788911","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Introduction</b>  Preauricular defect is one of the main concerns after superficial parotidectomy. Plastic surgeons have described many filling techniques to overcome the problem. <b>Objective</b>  To discuss three reconstruction techniques after superficial parotidectomy: partial-thickness, superiorly based sternocleidomastoid muscle flap; en-bloc fat graft; and platelet-rich fibrin gel, with a comparison of aesthetic and functional outcomes. <b>Methods</b>  The present study included 29 adult patients submitted to reconstruction after superficial parotidectomy by partial-thickness, superiorly based sternocleidomastoid muscle flap, en-bloc fat graft, and platelet-rich fibrin gel. A subjective evaluation of the facial nerve functions was conducted through a visual analog scale (VAS) with scores from 0 to 5, which was completed by the patient, a close relative, and 3 blinded staff members. <b>Results</b>  Regarding the VAS, in the comparison of the 3 groups at the sixth and twelfth postoperative months, the fat-graft group reported the highest mean values for satisfaction (3.4 ± 1.1 and 3.83 ± 0.97 respectively). The fat-graft group also showed highly significant differences when compared with the groups submitted to the sternocleidomastoid muscle flap ( <i>p</i>  = 0.0001) and the platelet-rich fibrin gel techniques ( <i>p</i>  = 0.016). <b>Conclusion</b>  Parotidectomy with immediate reconstruction of the surgical defect through an en-block fat graft provides better esthetic outcomes than sternocleidomastoid muscle flap and platelet-rich fibrin gel after one year. The patients submitted to the sternocleidomastoid muscle flap and fat-graft techniques reported minimal surgical site morbidity and a lower chance of developing Frey syndrome. The fat graft resulted in the best degree of cosmetic satisfaction, with minimal morbidity. Fat overcorrection is recommended.</p>","PeriodicalId":13731,"journal":{"name":"International Archives of Otorhinolaryngology","volume":"29 2","pages":"1-7"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12020495/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Archives of Otorhinolaryngology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0044-1788911","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/4/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction  Preauricular defect is one of the main concerns after superficial parotidectomy. Plastic surgeons have described many filling techniques to overcome the problem. Objective  To discuss three reconstruction techniques after superficial parotidectomy: partial-thickness, superiorly based sternocleidomastoid muscle flap; en-bloc fat graft; and platelet-rich fibrin gel, with a comparison of aesthetic and functional outcomes. Methods  The present study included 29 adult patients submitted to reconstruction after superficial parotidectomy by partial-thickness, superiorly based sternocleidomastoid muscle flap, en-bloc fat graft, and platelet-rich fibrin gel. A subjective evaluation of the facial nerve functions was conducted through a visual analog scale (VAS) with scores from 0 to 5, which was completed by the patient, a close relative, and 3 blinded staff members. Results  Regarding the VAS, in the comparison of the 3 groups at the sixth and twelfth postoperative months, the fat-graft group reported the highest mean values for satisfaction (3.4 ± 1.1 and 3.83 ± 0.97 respectively). The fat-graft group also showed highly significant differences when compared with the groups submitted to the sternocleidomastoid muscle flap ( p  = 0.0001) and the platelet-rich fibrin gel techniques ( p  = 0.016). Conclusion  Parotidectomy with immediate reconstruction of the surgical defect through an en-block fat graft provides better esthetic outcomes than sternocleidomastoid muscle flap and platelet-rich fibrin gel after one year. The patients submitted to the sternocleidomastoid muscle flap and fat-graft techniques reported minimal surgical site morbidity and a lower chance of developing Frey syndrome. The fat graft resulted in the best degree of cosmetic satisfaction, with minimal morbidity. Fat overcorrection is recommended.

三种腮腺表面切除术重建技术的美学和功能效果比较:一项介入性临床研究。
耳前缺损是腮腺浅表性切除术后的主要问题之一。整形外科医生已经描述了许多填充技术来克服这个问题。目的探讨腮腺浅表性切除术后的三种重建技术:部分厚度、上基胸锁乳突肌瓣;整体脂肪移植;和富含血小板的纤维蛋白凝胶,与美学和功能结果的比较。方法对29例腮腺浅表切除术后行胸锁乳突肌皮瓣、整块脂肪移植和富血小板纤维蛋白凝胶重建的成年患者进行研究。通过视觉模拟量表(VAS)对面神经功能进行主观评价,评分从0到5分,由患者、近亲属和3名盲法工作人员完成。结果在VAS评分方面,3组术后第6个月和第12个月的满意度均值比较,脂肪移植组满意度均值最高(分别为3.4±1.1和3.83±0.97)。与胸锁乳突肌皮瓣组(p = 0.0001)和富血小板纤维蛋白凝胶技术组(p = 0.016)相比,脂肪移植组也显示出高度显著的差异。结论腮腺切除术后即刻用脂肪块移植重建腮腺缺损比胸锁乳突肌瓣和富血小板纤维蛋白凝胶术后1年的美学效果更好。接受胸锁乳突肌皮瓣和脂肪移植技术的患者报告手术部位发病率最低,发生Frey综合征的机会较低。脂肪移植的结果是最大程度的美容满意度,最低的发病率。建议过度矫正脂肪。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
84
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信