Estimating 24-hour urine phosphate excretion from spot urine.

IF 3.9 2区 医学 Q1 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY
Clinical Kidney Journal Pub Date : 2025-04-10 eCollection Date: 2025-05-01 DOI:10.1093/ckj/sfaf097
Yongchao Li, Daniel G Fuster, Nasser A Dhayat, Harald Seeger, Alexander Ritter, Olivier Bonny, Gregoire Wuerzner, Thomas Ernandez, Stephan Segerer, Beat Roth, Isabel Rubio-Aliaga, Carsten A Wagner
{"title":"Estimating 24-hour urine phosphate excretion from spot urine.","authors":"Yongchao Li, Daniel G Fuster, Nasser A Dhayat, Harald Seeger, Alexander Ritter, Olivier Bonny, Gregoire Wuerzner, Thomas Ernandez, Stephan Segerer, Beat Roth, Isabel Rubio-Aliaga, Carsten A Wagner","doi":"10.1093/ckj/sfaf097","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>24-hour urinary phosphate excretion (24hUrP) is indicative of intestinal phosphate absorption in steady-state conditions. Nevertheless, 24-hour urine collections are cumbersome and error-prone. Previous studies suggested that spot urine phosphate (uPi) could serve as a practical substitute to predict 24hUrP, however, these data originated only from patients with chronic kidney disease. Here, we investigated the validity of predictive equations using spot urine parameters to assess 24hUrP in a cohort with normal kidney function (eGFR >60 ml/min per 1.73 m<sup>2</sup>) including 761 kidney stone patients and 207 non-kidney stone formers as assessed by low-dose CT scans, the Swiss Kidney Stone Cohort (SKSC).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Published equations for 24hUrP were tested in our cohort and a novel predictive equation was developed. Pearson correlation coefficients and Bland-Altman plots were used to assess the relationship between spot uPi and spot urine creatinine (uCr) and 24hUrP. Additionally, forward multivariate analysis was performed to predict uPi excretion.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Previously published equations provided less accurate prediction of 24hUrP from spot urine. Log-transformed 24hUrP with log-transformed spot uPi and creatinine yielded the best model fit. In addition, inclusion of age, sex, and BMI significantly improved prediction of 24hUrP. Compared with spot uPi and uCr alone (<i>r</i> <sup>2</sup> = 0.0561, <i>P</i> < .001) the new equation predicted 24hUrP (<i>r</i> <sup>2</sup> = 0.1820, <i>P</i> < .001) more accurately.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Here, we present a new equation for predicting 24hUrP from spot urine samples of individuals with normal kidney function. This model has a moderate ability to explain 24hUrP variance but has the strength to use only parameters routinely collected in clinical settings such as spot urinary phosphate and creatinine, sex, BMI, and age.</p>","PeriodicalId":10435,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Kidney Journal","volume":"18 5","pages":"sfaf097"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12067064/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Kidney Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ckj/sfaf097","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/5/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: 24-hour urinary phosphate excretion (24hUrP) is indicative of intestinal phosphate absorption in steady-state conditions. Nevertheless, 24-hour urine collections are cumbersome and error-prone. Previous studies suggested that spot urine phosphate (uPi) could serve as a practical substitute to predict 24hUrP, however, these data originated only from patients with chronic kidney disease. Here, we investigated the validity of predictive equations using spot urine parameters to assess 24hUrP in a cohort with normal kidney function (eGFR >60 ml/min per 1.73 m2) including 761 kidney stone patients and 207 non-kidney stone formers as assessed by low-dose CT scans, the Swiss Kidney Stone Cohort (SKSC).

Methods: Published equations for 24hUrP were tested in our cohort and a novel predictive equation was developed. Pearson correlation coefficients and Bland-Altman plots were used to assess the relationship between spot uPi and spot urine creatinine (uCr) and 24hUrP. Additionally, forward multivariate analysis was performed to predict uPi excretion.

Results: Previously published equations provided less accurate prediction of 24hUrP from spot urine. Log-transformed 24hUrP with log-transformed spot uPi and creatinine yielded the best model fit. In addition, inclusion of age, sex, and BMI significantly improved prediction of 24hUrP. Compared with spot uPi and uCr alone (r 2 = 0.0561, P < .001) the new equation predicted 24hUrP (r 2 = 0.1820, P < .001) more accurately.

Conclusions: Here, we present a new equation for predicting 24hUrP from spot urine samples of individuals with normal kidney function. This model has a moderate ability to explain 24hUrP variance but has the strength to use only parameters routinely collected in clinical settings such as spot urinary phosphate and creatinine, sex, BMI, and age.

估计24小时的尿磷排泄。
背景:24小时尿磷酸盐排泄量(24hUrP)是稳态条件下肠道磷酸盐吸收的指标。然而,24小时尿液收集是繁琐且容易出错的。先前的研究表明,尿磷酸点(uPi)可以作为预测24hUrP的实用替代指标,然而,这些数据仅来自慢性肾脏疾病患者。在瑞士肾结石队列(SKSC)中,我们通过低剂量CT扫描评估了761名肾结石患者和207名非肾结石患者,通过现场尿液参数评估肾功能正常队列(eGFR bb0 60 ml/min / 1.73 m2) 24hUrP预测方程的有效性。方法:在我们的队列中检验已发表的24hUrP方程,并开发了一个新的预测方程。采用Pearson相关系数和Bland-Altman图评估现场uPi与现场尿肌酐(uCr)和24hUrP之间的关系。此外,进行了前瞻性多变量分析来预测uPi排泄。结果:以前发表的公式提供了较不准确的预测24hUrP从现场尿液。对数变换24hUrP与对数变换点uPi和肌酐的模型拟合最佳。此外,纳入年龄、性别和BMI显著提高了24hUrP的预测。结论:本文提出了一种预测肾功能正常个体尿样24hUrP的新公式。该模型具有解释24hUrP差异的中等能力,但仅使用临床环境中常规收集的参数(如点尿磷酸盐和肌酐、性别、BMI和年龄)具有优势。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Clinical Kidney Journal
Clinical Kidney Journal Medicine-Transplantation
CiteScore
6.70
自引率
10.90%
发文量
242
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊介绍: About the Journal Clinical Kidney Journal: Clinical and Translational Nephrology (ckj), an official journal of the ERA-EDTA (European Renal Association-European Dialysis and Transplant Association), is a fully open access, online only journal publishing bimonthly. The journal is an essential educational and training resource integrating clinical, translational and educational research into clinical practice. ckj aims to contribute to a translational research culture among nephrologists and kidney pathologists that helps close the gap between basic researchers and practicing clinicians and promote sorely needed innovation in the Nephrology field. All research articles in this journal have undergone peer review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信