An in vitro study on the bond strength between composite resin and porcelain using different surface treatment and bonding methods

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q2 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
Mina Aker Sagen, Bjørk Eriksen, Kaja Moland, Bjørn Einar Dahl
{"title":"An in vitro study on the bond strength between composite resin and porcelain using different surface treatment and bonding methods","authors":"Mina Aker Sagen,&nbsp;Bjørk Eriksen,&nbsp;Kaja Moland,&nbsp;Bjørn Einar Dahl","doi":"10.1111/eos.70014","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The study aimed to determine the effect of different surface treatments and bonding methods on bond strength between composite resin and feldspar ceramic, focusing on the interplay between these variables for enhanced clinical outcomes of chipping repair. Two surface treatments (hydrofluoric acid [HF] etching and surface roughening using a diamond disc) were investigated alongside two bonding methods utilizing either a universal adhesive (Scotchbond Universal, 3M) or a separate silane primer and adhesive (Intraoral Repair Kit, BISCO). Bond strength was measured using shear forces, and light microscopy was used to analyse the fracture mode. The findings indicate that the bonding method plays a more significant role than surface treatment for increasing bond strength since bond strength was similar following either roughening or HF acid etching. The separate silane primer and adhesive demonstrated superior bond strength over the universal adhesive, despite both containing silane, and this was attributed to differences in silane monomer stability. Selecting an appropriate bonding method, specifically using separate silane primer, enhances bond strength in composite repairs. This approach may mitigate the known risks associated with HF and addresses clinical challenges by optimizing the bond stability between feldspathic porcelain and composite resin.</p>","PeriodicalId":11983,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Oral Sciences","volume":"133 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/eos.70014","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Oral Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/eos.70014","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The study aimed to determine the effect of different surface treatments and bonding methods on bond strength between composite resin and feldspar ceramic, focusing on the interplay between these variables for enhanced clinical outcomes of chipping repair. Two surface treatments (hydrofluoric acid [HF] etching and surface roughening using a diamond disc) were investigated alongside two bonding methods utilizing either a universal adhesive (Scotchbond Universal, 3M) or a separate silane primer and adhesive (Intraoral Repair Kit, BISCO). Bond strength was measured using shear forces, and light microscopy was used to analyse the fracture mode. The findings indicate that the bonding method plays a more significant role than surface treatment for increasing bond strength since bond strength was similar following either roughening or HF acid etching. The separate silane primer and adhesive demonstrated superior bond strength over the universal adhesive, despite both containing silane, and this was attributed to differences in silane monomer stability. Selecting an appropriate bonding method, specifically using separate silane primer, enhances bond strength in composite repairs. This approach may mitigate the known risks associated with HF and addresses clinical challenges by optimizing the bond stability between feldspathic porcelain and composite resin.

不同表面处理方法对复合树脂与陶瓷结合强度的体外研究。
本研究旨在确定不同的表面处理和粘接方法对复合树脂与长石陶瓷之间的粘接强度的影响,重点研究这些变量之间的相互作用,以提高切屑修复的临床效果。研究了两种表面处理(氢氟酸蚀刻和使用金刚石盘进行表面粗化)以及两种粘合方法,使用通用粘合剂(Scotchbond universal, 3M)或单独的硅烷底漆和粘合剂(口腔内修复工具,BISCO)。用剪切力测量粘结强度,并用光学显微镜分析断裂模式。结果表明,粗化和氢氟酸刻蚀的结合强度基本相同,因此,与表面处理相比,粗化方法对提高结合强度的作用更大。尽管两者都含有硅烷,但单独的硅烷底漆和粘合剂表现出优于通用粘合剂的结合强度,这是由于硅烷单体稳定性的差异。选择合适的粘接方法,特别是使用单独的硅烷底漆,可以提高复合材料修复中的粘接强度。这种方法可以减轻HF相关的已知风险,并通过优化长石瓷与复合树脂之间的键稳定性来解决临床挑战。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
European Journal of Oral Sciences
European Journal of Oral Sciences 医学-牙科与口腔外科
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
5.30%
发文量
61
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: The European Journal of Oral Sciences is an international journal which publishes original research papers within clinical dentistry, on all basic science aspects of structure, chemistry, developmental biology, physiology and pathology of relevant tissues, as well as on microbiology, biomaterials and the behavioural sciences as they relate to dentistry. In general, analytical studies are preferred to descriptive ones. Reviews, Short Communications and Letters to the Editor will also be considered for publication. The journal is published bimonthly.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信