A Comparative Study on the Shielding Calculation Methods for an Optimal Shielding Design of Isolation Rooms in a Nuclear Medicine Facility in the Philippines Providing 131I Thyroid Ablation Therapy.

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q4 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
J M G F Gonzales, K M Romallosa-Dean, M E S K V Ramo, V K Parami
{"title":"A Comparative Study on the Shielding Calculation Methods for an Optimal Shielding Design of Isolation Rooms in a Nuclear Medicine Facility in the Philippines Providing 131I Thyroid Ablation Therapy.","authors":"J M G F Gonzales, K M Romallosa-Dean, M E S K V Ramo, V K Parami","doi":"10.1097/HP.0000000000001988","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Abstract: </strong>Iodine-131 (131I) has been used widely in diagnosing and treating thyroid disorders, but its radioactive nature poses risks of gamma radiation exposure to those near the patient. To mitigate this, radiation protection measures are needed, among which is the provision of optimal structural shielding. In the Philippines, achieving this involves using minimum shielding thickness to meet safety limits from national regulations. Widely used conventional methods, like those based on the tenth-value layer (TVLs) measurements, may yield poor estimates, while computational simulations are precise but impractical to use due to their complexity. Archer's fitting method offers a simple and accurate alternative for designing optimal shielding in medical imaging and radiotherapy facilities based on multiple studies. However, little to no data is available regarding the use of Archer's fitting method in providing better accuracy in shielding calculations in isolation rooms of 131I therapy facilities. A comparison of the transmission factors calculated using different calculation methods was done, and their effect on the minimum shielding thicknesses was investigated. Transmission curves generated with broad-beam TVLs reported from previous studies yielded the closest agreement with ANS/ANSI 6.4.3 buildup factors for lead barriers. On the other hand, results showed the closest agreement among the transmission curves and shielding thicknesses acquired with the American National Standard (ANSI/ANS) 6.4.3. buildup factors, Archer's fitting method, and Monte Carlo simulation through Particle Heavy Ion Transport System (PHITS) ver. 3.28 code for ordinary concrete barriers. Poor agreement was seen with the curves generated with the Narrow-Beam and Ideal Broad Beam TVL methods and the curve generated with ANSI/ANS 6.4.3. buildup factor data. Broad-Beam TVLs from previous studies, Monte Carlo Simulation, and Archer's fit can be alternative options for shielding design. An experimental study is proposed for verification.</p>","PeriodicalId":12976,"journal":{"name":"Health physics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health physics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/HP.0000000000001988","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract: Iodine-131 (131I) has been used widely in diagnosing and treating thyroid disorders, but its radioactive nature poses risks of gamma radiation exposure to those near the patient. To mitigate this, radiation protection measures are needed, among which is the provision of optimal structural shielding. In the Philippines, achieving this involves using minimum shielding thickness to meet safety limits from national regulations. Widely used conventional methods, like those based on the tenth-value layer (TVLs) measurements, may yield poor estimates, while computational simulations are precise but impractical to use due to their complexity. Archer's fitting method offers a simple and accurate alternative for designing optimal shielding in medical imaging and radiotherapy facilities based on multiple studies. However, little to no data is available regarding the use of Archer's fitting method in providing better accuracy in shielding calculations in isolation rooms of 131I therapy facilities. A comparison of the transmission factors calculated using different calculation methods was done, and their effect on the minimum shielding thicknesses was investigated. Transmission curves generated with broad-beam TVLs reported from previous studies yielded the closest agreement with ANS/ANSI 6.4.3 buildup factors for lead barriers. On the other hand, results showed the closest agreement among the transmission curves and shielding thicknesses acquired with the American National Standard (ANSI/ANS) 6.4.3. buildup factors, Archer's fitting method, and Monte Carlo simulation through Particle Heavy Ion Transport System (PHITS) ver. 3.28 code for ordinary concrete barriers. Poor agreement was seen with the curves generated with the Narrow-Beam and Ideal Broad Beam TVL methods and the curve generated with ANSI/ANS 6.4.3. buildup factor data. Broad-Beam TVLs from previous studies, Monte Carlo Simulation, and Archer's fit can be alternative options for shielding design. An experimental study is proposed for verification.

菲律宾提供131I甲状腺消融治疗的核医学设施隔离室最佳屏蔽设计的屏蔽计算方法比较研究
摘要:碘-131 (131I)已广泛应用于甲状腺疾病的诊断和治疗,但其放射性性质会对患者周围的人造成伽马辐射暴露的风险。为了减轻这种情况,需要采取辐射防护措施,其中包括提供最佳的结构屏蔽。在菲律宾,实现这一目标需要使用最小的屏蔽厚度来满足国家法规的安全限制。广泛使用的传统方法,如基于第十值层(tlv)测量的方法,可能产生较差的估计,而计算模拟虽然精确,但由于其复杂性而无法使用。Archer的拟合方法为基于多项研究的医学成像和放疗设施的最佳屏蔽设计提供了一种简单而准确的替代方法。然而,关于使用Archer拟合方法在131I治疗设施的隔离室中提供更好的屏蔽计算准确性的数据很少或没有数据。比较了不同计算方法计算的透射系数,并研究了它们对最小屏蔽厚度的影响。根据先前的研究报告,宽光束tvl产生的透射曲线与ANS/ANSI 6.4.3铅屏障的累积因子最接近。另一方面,透射曲线和屏蔽厚度与美国国家标准(ANSI/ANS) 6.4.3最吻合。粒子重离子输运系统(PHITS)的累积因子、Archer拟合方法及蒙特卡罗模拟。3.28普通混凝土护栏规范。窄波束和理想宽波束TVL方法生成的曲线与ANSI/ANS 6.4.3生成的曲线一致性较差。累积因子数据。从以前的研究,蒙特卡罗模拟和阿切尔的配合宽波束tvl可以替代屏蔽设计的选择。提出了一项实验研究来验证。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Health physics
Health physics 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
324
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Health Physics, first published in 1958, provides the latest research to a wide variety of radiation safety professionals including health physicists, nuclear chemists, medical physicists, and radiation safety officers with interests in nuclear and radiation science. The Journal allows professionals in these and other disciplines in science and engineering to stay on the cutting edge of scientific and technological advances in the field of radiation safety. The Journal publishes original papers, technical notes, articles on advances in practical applications, editorials, and correspondence. Journal articles report on the latest findings in theoretical, practical, and applied disciplines of epidemiology and radiation effects, radiation biology and radiation science, radiation ecology, and related fields.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信