Clinical Outcome of Inflammatory Bowel Disease with Clostridioides difficile Polymerase Chain Reaction Toxin-Positive/Enzyme Immunoassay Toxin-Negative: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

IF 2.5 4区 医学 Q2 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
Junseok Park, Seulji Kim, Jong Pil Im, Hyun Jung Lee, Joo Sung Kim, Hyunsun Park, Yoo Min Han, Seong-Joon Koh
{"title":"Clinical Outcome of Inflammatory Bowel Disease with Clostridioides difficile Polymerase Chain Reaction Toxin-Positive/Enzyme Immunoassay Toxin-Negative: A Retrospective Cohort Study.","authors":"Junseok Park, Seulji Kim, Jong Pil Im, Hyun Jung Lee, Joo Sung Kim, Hyunsun Park, Yoo Min Han, Seong-Joon Koh","doi":"10.1007/s10620-025-09045-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI) frequently occurs concurrently in patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), and differential diagnosis from IBD flares is critical. However, clinical management of C. difficile in IBD patients with polymerase chain reaction toxin-positive (tPCR+)/enzyme immunoassay toxin-negative (tEIA-) results has not yet been investigated.</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>We aimed to assess the clinical significance of C. difficile tPCR+/tEIA- in patients with IBD and the impact of antibiotic treatment on IBD outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This single-center, retrospective cohort study included patients with IBD with CDI test results between January 01, 2018, and August 01, 2022. First, the clinical outcomes of IBD, such as medication escalation, hospitalization, and surgery, were compared between patients with IBD with tPCR-/tEIA- and those with tPCR+/tEIA- using Cox regression and propensity score matching. Next, the clinical outcomes of IBD were assessed based on whether antibiotic treatment for CDI was administered to both groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 412 patients with IBD with PCR test, 71 (17.2%) showed tPCR+/tEIA- results. The tPCR+/tEIA- group showed no statistically significant difference in IBD outcomes compared to the tPCR-/tEIA- group. The antibiotic-treated tPCR+/tEIA- group showed a higher risk of drug escalation and admission than the tPCR-/tEIA- group, while the antibiotic-untreated tPCR+/tEIA- group did not. After drug escalation during the follow-up, the treated tPCR+/tEIA- group showed IBD outcomes similar to those of the tPCR-/tEIA- group.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In patients with IBD with indeterminate CDI, the need for antibiotics should be thoroughly assessed and proper management of underlying IBD such as drug escalation may lead to favorable outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":11378,"journal":{"name":"Digestive Diseases and Sciences","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Digestive Diseases and Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10620-025-09045-4","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI) frequently occurs concurrently in patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), and differential diagnosis from IBD flares is critical. However, clinical management of C. difficile in IBD patients with polymerase chain reaction toxin-positive (tPCR+)/enzyme immunoassay toxin-negative (tEIA-) results has not yet been investigated.

Aims: We aimed to assess the clinical significance of C. difficile tPCR+/tEIA- in patients with IBD and the impact of antibiotic treatment on IBD outcomes.

Methods: This single-center, retrospective cohort study included patients with IBD with CDI test results between January 01, 2018, and August 01, 2022. First, the clinical outcomes of IBD, such as medication escalation, hospitalization, and surgery, were compared between patients with IBD with tPCR-/tEIA- and those with tPCR+/tEIA- using Cox regression and propensity score matching. Next, the clinical outcomes of IBD were assessed based on whether antibiotic treatment for CDI was administered to both groups.

Results: Among 412 patients with IBD with PCR test, 71 (17.2%) showed tPCR+/tEIA- results. The tPCR+/tEIA- group showed no statistically significant difference in IBD outcomes compared to the tPCR-/tEIA- group. The antibiotic-treated tPCR+/tEIA- group showed a higher risk of drug escalation and admission than the tPCR-/tEIA- group, while the antibiotic-untreated tPCR+/tEIA- group did not. After drug escalation during the follow-up, the treated tPCR+/tEIA- group showed IBD outcomes similar to those of the tPCR-/tEIA- group.

Conclusions: In patients with IBD with indeterminate CDI, the need for antibiotics should be thoroughly assessed and proper management of underlying IBD such as drug escalation may lead to favorable outcomes.

艰难梭菌聚合酶链反应毒素阳性/酶免疫测定毒素阴性炎症性肠病的临床结果:一项回顾性队列研究
背景:艰难梭菌感染(CDI)经常同时发生在炎症性肠病(IBD)患者中,IBD发作的鉴别诊断至关重要。然而,在聚合酶链反应毒素阳性(tPCR+)/酶免疫测定毒素阴性(tEIA-)的IBD患者中,艰难梭菌的临床管理尚未进行研究。目的:我们旨在评估艰难梭菌tPCR+/tEIA-在IBD患者中的临床意义以及抗生素治疗对IBD预后的影响。方法:这项单中心、回顾性队列研究纳入了2018年1月1日至2022年8月1日期间CDI检测结果为IBD的患者。首先,使用Cox回归和倾向评分匹配,比较了tPCR-/tEIA-的IBD患者和tPCR+/tEIA-的IBD患者的临床结局,如药物升级、住院和手术。接下来,根据两组是否使用抗生素治疗CDI来评估IBD的临床结果。结果:在412例进行PCR检测的IBD患者中,71例(17.2%)显示tPCR+/tEIA-结果。与tPCR-/tEIA-组相比,tPCR+/tEIA-组IBD预后无统计学差异。抗生素治疗的tPCR+/tEIA-组药物升级和入院风险高于tPCR-/tEIA-组,而未经抗生素治疗的tPCR+/tEIA-组则没有。在随访期间药物升级后,治疗tPCR+/tEIA-组的IBD结果与tPCR-/tEIA-组相似。结论:对于CDI不确定的IBD患者,应彻底评估抗生素的需求,并对潜在IBD进行适当的管理,如药物升级,可能会导致良好的结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Digestive Diseases and Sciences
Digestive Diseases and Sciences 医学-胃肠肝病学
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
3.20%
发文量
420
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Digestive Diseases and Sciences publishes high-quality, peer-reviewed, original papers addressing aspects of basic/translational and clinical research in gastroenterology, hepatology, and related fields. This well-illustrated journal features comprehensive coverage of basic pathophysiology, new technological advances, and clinical breakthroughs; insights from prominent academicians and practitioners concerning new scientific developments and practical medical issues; and discussions focusing on the latest changes in local and worldwide social, economic, and governmental policies that affect the delivery of care within the disciplines of gastroenterology and hepatology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信