Alice Raffetin, Anna J Henningsson, Katharina Ornstein, Pauline Arias, Volker Fingerle, Solene Patrat-Delon, Daniel Bremell, Per Eric Lindgren, Tobias A Rupprecht, Benoît Jaulhac, Klaus-Peter Hunfeld, Céline Cazorla, Mateusz Markowicz, Reto Lienhard, Alje P van Dam, Elisabeth Baux, Sally Mavin, Joppe W Hovius, M E Baarsma, Kristine Karlsrud Berg, Randi Eikeland, Ram B Dessau
{"title":"Towards shortening the duration of antibiotic therapy for Lyme borreliosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Alice Raffetin, Anna J Henningsson, Katharina Ornstein, Pauline Arias, Volker Fingerle, Solene Patrat-Delon, Daniel Bremell, Per Eric Lindgren, Tobias A Rupprecht, Benoît Jaulhac, Klaus-Peter Hunfeld, Céline Cazorla, Mateusz Markowicz, Reto Lienhard, Alje P van Dam, Elisabeth Baux, Sally Mavin, Joppe W Hovius, M E Baarsma, Kristine Karlsrud Berg, Randi Eikeland, Ram B Dessau","doi":"10.1007/s15010-025-02501-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Systematic review and meta-analysis on shortening antibiotic therapy for Lyme borreliosis (LB) patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data sources: Medline, Google, and Google Scholar (queried from January 2022-February 2024), following the PRISMA method and the Cochrane Handbook.</p><p><strong>Eligibility criteria: </strong>Randomized clinical trials, comparative studies; clear definitions of LB, duration of antibiotics and outcome; follow-up ≥ 6-12 months. Meta-analysis included studies that examined three outcomes: treatment failure; residual symptoms; adverse events.</p><p><strong>Intervention: </strong>Short vs. extended antibiotic therapy for erythema migrans (≤ 10 days vs. > 10 days) and disseminated LB (≤ 21 days vs. > 21 days). Assessment of risk of bias. Independently, using the Cochrane Tools.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>of data synthesis. Estimation of treatment effects based on a fixed-effect model (Mantel-Haenszel or Peto method), with odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Thirty-eight full-text articles were examined (850 patients): 29 were included in the qualitative analysis; six in the meta-analysis. Heterogeneity was low (I<sup>2</sup> = 0%). At 12 months, short-term treatment did not differ from long-term treatment in terms of failures (OR1.50, 95%CI[0.43-5.22]) and residual symptoms (OR0.95, 95%CI[0.66-1.37]), albeit with small samples.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This meta-analysis was underpowered to prove non-inferiority of shorter treatment, but suggests its safety for EM. Studies focusing on antibiotics duration, with sufficient sample sizes and clear outcomes, are warranted.</p>","PeriodicalId":13600,"journal":{"name":"Infection","volume":" ","pages":"809-830"},"PeriodicalIF":5.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Infection","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s15010-025-02501-3","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/4/17 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objectives: Systematic review and meta-analysis on shortening antibiotic therapy for Lyme borreliosis (LB) patients.
Methods: Data sources: Medline, Google, and Google Scholar (queried from January 2022-February 2024), following the PRISMA method and the Cochrane Handbook.
Eligibility criteria: Randomized clinical trials, comparative studies; clear definitions of LB, duration of antibiotics and outcome; follow-up ≥ 6-12 months. Meta-analysis included studies that examined three outcomes: treatment failure; residual symptoms; adverse events.
Intervention: Short vs. extended antibiotic therapy for erythema migrans (≤ 10 days vs. > 10 days) and disseminated LB (≤ 21 days vs. > 21 days). Assessment of risk of bias. Independently, using the Cochrane Tools.
Methods: of data synthesis. Estimation of treatment effects based on a fixed-effect model (Mantel-Haenszel or Peto method), with odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI).
Results: Thirty-eight full-text articles were examined (850 patients): 29 were included in the qualitative analysis; six in the meta-analysis. Heterogeneity was low (I2 = 0%). At 12 months, short-term treatment did not differ from long-term treatment in terms of failures (OR1.50, 95%CI[0.43-5.22]) and residual symptoms (OR0.95, 95%CI[0.66-1.37]), albeit with small samples.
Conclusion: This meta-analysis was underpowered to prove non-inferiority of shorter treatment, but suggests its safety for EM. Studies focusing on antibiotics duration, with sufficient sample sizes and clear outcomes, are warranted.
期刊介绍:
Infection is a journal dedicated to serving as a global forum for the presentation and discussion of clinically relevant information on infectious diseases. Its primary goal is to engage readers and contributors from various regions around the world in the exchange of knowledge about the etiology, pathogenesis, diagnosis, and treatment of infectious diseases, both in outpatient and inpatient settings.
The journal covers a wide range of topics, including:
Etiology: The study of the causes of infectious diseases.
Pathogenesis: The process by which an infectious agent causes disease.
Diagnosis: The methods and techniques used to identify infectious diseases.
Treatment: The medical interventions and strategies employed to treat infectious diseases.
Public Health: Issues of local, regional, or international significance related to infectious diseases, including prevention, control, and management strategies.
Hospital Epidemiology: The study of the spread of infectious diseases within healthcare settings and the measures to prevent nosocomial infections.
In addition to these, Infection also includes a specialized "Images" section, which focuses on high-quality visual content, such as images, photographs, and microscopic slides, accompanied by brief abstracts. This section is designed to highlight the clinical and diagnostic value of visual aids in the field of infectious diseases, as many conditions present with characteristic clinical signs that can be diagnosed through inspection, and imaging and microscopy are crucial for accurate diagnosis. The journal's comprehensive approach ensures that it remains a valuable resource for healthcare professionals and researchers in the field of infectious diseases.