Exploring the causal link between childhood maltreatment and asthma: a Mendelian randomization study.

IF 4.1 2区 医学 Q1 PSYCHIATRY
Zheng Zhang, Yating Wang, Jiazheng Li, Hao Ren, Xinglian Wang, Haitang Qiu, Huirong Luo, Xueqian Wang, Junyao Li, Renqin Hu, Yanwei Guo, Jinglan Tan, Chenggang Jiang, Qinghua Luo
{"title":"Exploring the causal link between childhood maltreatment and asthma: a Mendelian randomization study.","authors":"Zheng Zhang, Yating Wang, Jiazheng Li, Hao Ren, Xinglian Wang, Haitang Qiu, Huirong Luo, Xueqian Wang, Junyao Li, Renqin Hu, Yanwei Guo, Jinglan Tan, Chenggang Jiang, Qinghua Luo","doi":"10.1080/20008066.2024.2383127","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background:</b> Prior research indicates a potential connection between childhood maltreatment and asthma. In response, we designed a Mendelian Randomization (MR) study to further investigate this association.<b>Methods:</b> Utilizing the MR approach, we leveraged Genome-Wide Association Studies (GWAS) data from the UK Biobank (UKB). Our primary outcome was asthma, analyzed through GWAS datasets termed AsthmaUKB and AsthmaIEU, sourced from two distinct studies. Additionally, we conducted stratified analyses focusing on pediatric asthma and adult asthma to address different asthma phenotypes. The causal impact of childhood maltreatment (CM) on asthma was assessed using inverse-variance weighted (IVW) methods, MR-Egger, and MR-PRESSO tests, thereby enhancing the robustness and generalizability of our findings.<b>Results:</b> The IVW analyses identified significant associations between CM and increased risks for AsthmaUKB (<i>OR</i> = 1.59, 95% <i>CI</i> = 1.23-2.05, <i>p</i> < .001), AsthmaIEU (<i>OR</i> = 1.04, 95% <i>CI </i>= 1.02-1.06, <i>p</i> < .001), pediatric asthma (<i>OR</i> = 1.72, 95% <i>CI</i> = 1.26-2.35, <i>p</i> = .001), and adult asthma (<i>OR</i> = 1.71, 95% <i>CI</i> = 1.17-2.48, <i>p</i> = .005). The MR-Egger and MR-PRESSO results confirmed the absence of pleiotropy, reinforcing our causal inferences. Although Cochran's <i>Q</i> test indicated some heterogeneity among asthma subtypes (<i>p</i> > .05), the robustness of the IVW results remains reliable.<b>Conclusions:</b> Our findings suggest a potential causal relationship between CM and various asthma phenotypes, as validated through rigorous Mendelian randomization analyses. These results emphasize the importance of considering CM in asthma prevention and intervention strategies and lay the groundwork for further investigation into how early-life adversities may predispose individuals to asthma, contributing to a deeper understanding of its etiological pathways.</p>","PeriodicalId":12055,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Psychotraumatology","volume":"16 1","pages":"2383127"},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11998307/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Psychotraumatology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/20008066.2024.2383127","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/4/14 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Prior research indicates a potential connection between childhood maltreatment and asthma. In response, we designed a Mendelian Randomization (MR) study to further investigate this association.Methods: Utilizing the MR approach, we leveraged Genome-Wide Association Studies (GWAS) data from the UK Biobank (UKB). Our primary outcome was asthma, analyzed through GWAS datasets termed AsthmaUKB and AsthmaIEU, sourced from two distinct studies. Additionally, we conducted stratified analyses focusing on pediatric asthma and adult asthma to address different asthma phenotypes. The causal impact of childhood maltreatment (CM) on asthma was assessed using inverse-variance weighted (IVW) methods, MR-Egger, and MR-PRESSO tests, thereby enhancing the robustness and generalizability of our findings.Results: The IVW analyses identified significant associations between CM and increased risks for AsthmaUKB (OR = 1.59, 95% CI = 1.23-2.05, p < .001), AsthmaIEU (OR = 1.04, 95% CI = 1.02-1.06, p < .001), pediatric asthma (OR = 1.72, 95% CI = 1.26-2.35, p = .001), and adult asthma (OR = 1.71, 95% CI = 1.17-2.48, p = .005). The MR-Egger and MR-PRESSO results confirmed the absence of pleiotropy, reinforcing our causal inferences. Although Cochran's Q test indicated some heterogeneity among asthma subtypes (p > .05), the robustness of the IVW results remains reliable.Conclusions: Our findings suggest a potential causal relationship between CM and various asthma phenotypes, as validated through rigorous Mendelian randomization analyses. These results emphasize the importance of considering CM in asthma prevention and intervention strategies and lay the groundwork for further investigation into how early-life adversities may predispose individuals to asthma, contributing to a deeper understanding of its etiological pathways.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

探索儿童虐待与哮喘之间的因果关系:一项孟德尔随机研究。
背景:先前的研究表明儿童虐待与哮喘之间存在潜在的联系。为此,我们设计了一项孟德尔随机化(MR)研究来进一步研究这种关联。方法:利用MR方法,我们利用来自UK Biobank (UKB)的全基因组关联研究(GWAS)数据。我们的主要终点是哮喘,通过来自两项不同研究的名为AsthmaUKB和AsthmaIEU的GWAS数据集进行分析。此外,我们对儿童哮喘和成人哮喘进行了分层分析,以解决不同的哮喘表型。使用反方差加权(IVW)方法、MR-Egger和MR-PRESSO检验评估儿童虐待(CM)对哮喘的因果影响,从而增强了我们研究结果的稳健性和普遍性。结果:IVW分析发现CM与哮喘(OR = 1.59, 95% CI = 1.23-2.05, p < .001)、哮喘(OR = 1.04, 95% CI = 1.02-1.06, p < .001)、儿童哮喘(OR = 1.72, 95% CI = 1.26-2.35, p = .001)和成人哮喘(OR = 1.71, 95% CI = 1.17-2.48, p = .005)风险增加之间存在显著关联。egger先生和presso先生的结果证实了多效性的缺失,强化了我们的因果推论。虽然Cochran’s Q检验显示哮喘亚型之间存在一定的异质性(p < 0.05),但IVW结果的稳健性仍然是可靠的。结论:我们的研究结果表明CM与各种哮喘表型之间存在潜在的因果关系,并通过严格的孟德尔随机化分析得到了验证。这些结果强调了在哮喘预防和干预策略中考虑CM的重要性,并为进一步研究早期生活逆境如何使个体易患哮喘奠定了基础,有助于更深入地了解其病因途径。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.60
自引率
12.00%
发文量
153
审稿时长
18 weeks
期刊介绍: The European Journal of Psychotraumatology (EJPT) is a peer-reviewed open access interdisciplinary journal owned by the European Society of Traumatic Stress Studies (ESTSS). The European Journal of Psychotraumatology (EJPT) aims to engage scholars, clinicians and researchers in the vital issues of how to understand, prevent and treat the consequences of stress and trauma, including but not limited to, posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD), depressive disorders, substance abuse, burnout, and neurobiological or physical consequences, using the latest research or clinical experience in these areas. The journal shares ESTSS’ mission to advance and disseminate scientific knowledge about traumatic stress. Papers may address individual events, repeated or chronic (complex) trauma, large scale disasters, or violence. Being open access, the European Journal of Psychotraumatology is also evidence of ESTSS’ stand on free accessibility of research publications to a wider community via the web. The European Journal of Psychotraumatology seeks to attract contributions from academics and practitioners from diverse professional backgrounds, including, but not restricted to, those in mental health, social sciences, and health and welfare services. Contributions from outside Europe are welcome. The journal welcomes original basic and clinical research articles that consolidate and expand the theoretical and professional basis of the field of traumatic stress; Review articles including meta-analyses; short communications presenting new ideas or early-stage promising research; study protocols that describe proposed or ongoing research; case reports examining a single individual or event in a real‑life context; clinical practice papers sharing experience from the clinic; letters to the Editor debating articles already published in the Journal; inaugural Lectures; conference abstracts and book reviews. Both quantitative and qualitative research is welcome.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信