Insights into healthcare workers' perceptions of electronic medical record system utilization: a cross-sectional study in Mafeteng district, Lesotho.

IF 3.3 3区 医学 Q2 MEDICAL INFORMATICS
Tebeli E Sekoai, Astrid Turner, Janine Mitchell
{"title":"Insights into healthcare workers' perceptions of electronic medical record system utilization: a cross-sectional study in Mafeteng district, Lesotho.","authors":"Tebeli E Sekoai, Astrid Turner, Janine Mitchell","doi":"10.1186/s12911-025-02858-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Electronic medical record (EMR) systems have significantly transformed how healthcare data is created, managed, and utilized, offering improved legibility, accessibility, and support for clinical decision-making compared to paper records. In Lesotho, the system was implemented to enhance patient care, track patients, and generate reports for evidence-based programming. It is imperative to understand how healthcare workers (HCWs) perceive the system as frontline end-users; thus, the aim of the study was to explore HCWs' perceptions of the system, focusing on perceived usefulness (PU) and perceived ease of use (PEU) and factors influencing acceptance and utilization in Mafeteng district.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A descriptive cross-sectional study design was conducted; 145 healthcare workers from 17 health facilities were invited to participate. The Technology Acceptance Model was incorporated into a self-administered questionnaire. The analysis employed descriptive statistics and the constructs of PU and PEU using Stata/BE 18.0. Multiple regression examined HCWs' perceptions, while verbatim text from participants clarified quantitative findings.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study had a 49% response rate (n = 71). Most participants were female (70.42%; n = 50), with registered nurse midwives as the most common profession (45.07%; n = 32). A large proportion reported 'good' or 'very good' computer skills (43.66%; n = 31). For PU, 87.32% found the EMR system useful, 83.1% agreed it improves job performance, and 83.1% said it saves time. For PEU, 85.91% found the system easy to use, 81.69% could recover from errors, and 85% could remember task procedures. Network connectivity and electricity supply were cited as barriers to the effective use of the EMR system in health facilities, resulting in interruptions in service delivery. The characteristics of sex and profession had no significant impact on PU and PEU, while both qualification (p = 0.035) and computer skills (p = 0.007) were significant, indicating a positive association with greater PEU of the EMR system.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>HCWs in the Mafeteng District exhibited positive attitudes toward the EMR system, recognising its usefulness, ease of use, and efficiency. Sustaining computer literacy and addressing infrastructural challenges could further enhance the successful implementation and adoption of the system, ultimately improving patient care outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":9340,"journal":{"name":"BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making","volume":"25 1","pages":"181"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12070494/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12911-025-02858-3","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICAL INFORMATICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Electronic medical record (EMR) systems have significantly transformed how healthcare data is created, managed, and utilized, offering improved legibility, accessibility, and support for clinical decision-making compared to paper records. In Lesotho, the system was implemented to enhance patient care, track patients, and generate reports for evidence-based programming. It is imperative to understand how healthcare workers (HCWs) perceive the system as frontline end-users; thus, the aim of the study was to explore HCWs' perceptions of the system, focusing on perceived usefulness (PU) and perceived ease of use (PEU) and factors influencing acceptance and utilization in Mafeteng district.

Methods: A descriptive cross-sectional study design was conducted; 145 healthcare workers from 17 health facilities were invited to participate. The Technology Acceptance Model was incorporated into a self-administered questionnaire. The analysis employed descriptive statistics and the constructs of PU and PEU using Stata/BE 18.0. Multiple regression examined HCWs' perceptions, while verbatim text from participants clarified quantitative findings.

Results: The study had a 49% response rate (n = 71). Most participants were female (70.42%; n = 50), with registered nurse midwives as the most common profession (45.07%; n = 32). A large proportion reported 'good' or 'very good' computer skills (43.66%; n = 31). For PU, 87.32% found the EMR system useful, 83.1% agreed it improves job performance, and 83.1% said it saves time. For PEU, 85.91% found the system easy to use, 81.69% could recover from errors, and 85% could remember task procedures. Network connectivity and electricity supply were cited as barriers to the effective use of the EMR system in health facilities, resulting in interruptions in service delivery. The characteristics of sex and profession had no significant impact on PU and PEU, while both qualification (p = 0.035) and computer skills (p = 0.007) were significant, indicating a positive association with greater PEU of the EMR system.

Conclusion: HCWs in the Mafeteng District exhibited positive attitudes toward the EMR system, recognising its usefulness, ease of use, and efficiency. Sustaining computer literacy and addressing infrastructural challenges could further enhance the successful implementation and adoption of the system, ultimately improving patient care outcomes.

深入了解卫生保健工作者对电子病历系统使用的看法:莱索托马菲腾地区的横断面研究。
背景:电子医疗记录(EMR)系统显著地改变了医疗数据的创建、管理和利用方式,与纸质记录相比,它提供了更好的易读性、可访问性和临床决策支持。在莱索托实施了该系统,以加强患者护理、跟踪患者并为循证规划生成报告。必须了解卫生保健工作者(HCWs)如何看待作为一线最终用户的系统;因此,本研究的目的是探讨卫生保健工作者对该系统的感知,重点关注感知有用性(PU)和感知易用性(PEU)以及影响马菲腾地区卫生保健工作者接受和使用的因素。方法:采用描述性横断面研究设计;来自17个卫生机构的145名卫生保健工作者被邀请参加。技术接受模型被纳入一个自我管理的问卷。分析采用描述性统计,使用Stata/BE 18.0构建PU和PEU。多元回归检验了医护人员的看法,而来自参与者的逐字文本澄清了定量结果。结果:研究有效率为49% (n = 71)。参与者以女性居多(70.42%);N = 50),以注册护士助产士为最常见职业(45.07%;n = 32)。大部分受访者认为电脑技能“好”或“非常好”(43.66%;n = 31)。对于PU, 87.32%的人认为EMR系统很有用,83.1%的人认为它提高了工作绩效,83.1%的人认为它节省了时间。对于PEU, 85.91%的人认为系统易于使用,81.69%的人认为系统可以从错误中恢复,85%的人认为系统可以记住任务流程。网络连通性和电力供应被认为是阻碍卫生设施有效使用电子病历系统的障碍,导致服务提供中断。性别和职业特征对PU和PEU没有显著影响,而资格(p = 0.035)和计算机技能(p = 0.007)都有显著影响,表明EMR系统中较高的PEU与性别和职业特征呈正相关。结论:马飞腾区卫生保健工作者对电子病历系统持积极态度,认为其实用性、易用性和高效性。保持计算机素养和解决基础设施挑战可以进一步提高系统的成功实施和采用,最终改善患者护理结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.20
自引率
5.70%
发文量
297
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making is an open access journal publishing original peer-reviewed research articles in relation to the design, development, implementation, use, and evaluation of health information technologies and decision-making for human health.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信