Renée M G Verdiesen, Mehrnoosh Shokouhi, Stephen Burgess, Sander Canisius, Jenny Chang-Claude, Stig E Bojesen, Marjanka K Schmidt
{"title":"Causal effects of breast cancer risk factors across hormone receptor breast cancer subtypes: A two-sample Mendelian randomization study.","authors":"Renée M G Verdiesen, Mehrnoosh Shokouhi, Stephen Burgess, Sander Canisius, Jenny Chang-Claude, Stig E Bojesen, Marjanka K Schmidt","doi":"10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-24-1440","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>It is unclear if established breast cancer risk factors exert similar causal effects across hormone receptor breast cancer subtypes. We estimated and compared causal estimates of height, body mass index (BMI), type 2 diabetes, age at menarche, age at menopause, breast density, alcohol consumption, regular smoking, and physical activity across these subtypes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We used a two-sample Mendelian randomization approach and selected genetic instrumental variables from large-scale GWAS. Publicly available summary-level BCAC data (n = 247,173; 133,384 cases, 113,789 controls) for the following subtypes were included: luminal A-like (45,253 cases); luminal B/HER2-negative-like (6,350 cases); luminal B-like (6,427 cases); HER2-enriched-like (2,884 cases); triple negative (8,602 cases). We employed multiple MR methods to evaluate the strength of causal evidence for each risk factor-subtype association.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Collectively, our analyses indicated that increased height and decreased BMI are probable causal risk factors for all five subtypes. For the other risk factors, the strength of evidence for causal effects differed across subtypes. Heterogeneity in the magnitude of causal effect estimates for age at menopause and breast density was explained by null findings for triple negative tumours. Regular smoking was the sole risk factor for which there was no evidence for a causal effect on any subtype.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study suggests that established breast cancer risk factors differ across hormone receptor subtypes.</p><p><strong>Impact: </strong>Our results are valuable for the development of primary prevention strategies, improvement of breast cancer risk stratification in the general population, and for the identification of novel breast cancer risk factors.</p>","PeriodicalId":9458,"journal":{"name":"Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-24-1440","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: It is unclear if established breast cancer risk factors exert similar causal effects across hormone receptor breast cancer subtypes. We estimated and compared causal estimates of height, body mass index (BMI), type 2 diabetes, age at menarche, age at menopause, breast density, alcohol consumption, regular smoking, and physical activity across these subtypes.
Methods: We used a two-sample Mendelian randomization approach and selected genetic instrumental variables from large-scale GWAS. Publicly available summary-level BCAC data (n = 247,173; 133,384 cases, 113,789 controls) for the following subtypes were included: luminal A-like (45,253 cases); luminal B/HER2-negative-like (6,350 cases); luminal B-like (6,427 cases); HER2-enriched-like (2,884 cases); triple negative (8,602 cases). We employed multiple MR methods to evaluate the strength of causal evidence for each risk factor-subtype association.
Results: Collectively, our analyses indicated that increased height and decreased BMI are probable causal risk factors for all five subtypes. For the other risk factors, the strength of evidence for causal effects differed across subtypes. Heterogeneity in the magnitude of causal effect estimates for age at menopause and breast density was explained by null findings for triple negative tumours. Regular smoking was the sole risk factor for which there was no evidence for a causal effect on any subtype.
Conclusions: This study suggests that established breast cancer risk factors differ across hormone receptor subtypes.
Impact: Our results are valuable for the development of primary prevention strategies, improvement of breast cancer risk stratification in the general population, and for the identification of novel breast cancer risk factors.
期刊介绍:
Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention publishes original peer-reviewed, population-based research on cancer etiology, prevention, surveillance, and survivorship. The following topics are of special interest: descriptive, analytical, and molecular epidemiology; biomarkers including assay development, validation, and application; chemoprevention and other types of prevention research in the context of descriptive and observational studies; the role of behavioral factors in cancer etiology and prevention; survivorship studies; risk factors; implementation science and cancer care delivery; and the science of cancer health disparities. Besides welcoming manuscripts that address individual subjects in any of the relevant disciplines, CEBP editors encourage the submission of manuscripts with a transdisciplinary approach.