Efficacy of vitrectomy combined with and without cataract surgery for diabetic macular edema: one-year follow-up multi-center study in Japan.

IF 2.4 3区 医学 Q2 OPHTHALMOLOGY
Yutaka Yamada, Yoshihiro Takamura, Kazuma Saito, Akira Minamoto, Gaku Ishigooka, Takashi Koto, Yuki Nakano, Eiko Tsuiki, Hiroto Terasaki, Miho Shimizu, Masayo Kimura, Yoshinori Mitamura, Reio Sekine, Yutaro Mizusawa, Takao Hirano, Tomoyuki Oyama, Takeshi Iwase, Fumiaki Higashijima, Hisashi Matsubara, Masaru Inatani
{"title":"Efficacy of vitrectomy combined with and without cataract surgery for diabetic macular edema: one-year follow-up multi-center study in Japan.","authors":"Yutaka Yamada, Yoshihiro Takamura, Kazuma Saito, Akira Minamoto, Gaku Ishigooka, Takashi Koto, Yuki Nakano, Eiko Tsuiki, Hiroto Terasaki, Miho Shimizu, Masayo Kimura, Yoshinori Mitamura, Reio Sekine, Yutaro Mizusawa, Takao Hirano, Tomoyuki Oyama, Takeshi Iwase, Fumiaki Higashijima, Hisashi Matsubara, Masaru Inatani","doi":"10.1007/s00417-025-06845-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To evaluate the efficacy of vitrectomy, with and without cataract surgery, for diabetic macular edema (DME) in Japan.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>This retrospective study was conducted at 22 sites in Japan and enrolled patients who underwent vitrectomy either without (VIT group) or with (VIT + CS group) cataract surgery. Central retinal thickness (CRT) and best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) were measured before surgery and at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months after surgery.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 722 patients with DME (482 in the VIT + CS group and 240 in the VIT group) were enrolled. CRT significantly decreased after 1 month and continued thereafter in both groups. BCVA significantly improved at 1 month in the VIT + CS group and at 6 months in the VIT group. In both groups, regardless of epiretinal membrane removal, CRT and BCVA significantly improved, with no additional benefit from concomitant internal limiting membrane peeling. The change in BCVA was significantly correlated with the change in CRT during 6 months postoperatively in all patients and in the VIT group. Patients with worse preoperative visual acuity had a higher likelihood of improved BCVA at 6 and 12 months after surgery. No significant difference in BCVA was observed before and after surgery in patients with a preoperative visual acuity of 20/40 or better. However, in patients with a visual acuity of 20/50 or worse, BCVA significantly improved 1 month after surgery.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Vitrectomy is anatomically and functionally effective for DME, and combined cataract surgery is beneficial in DME cases with cataracts. Patients with poor preoperative BCVA improved, while those with good vision maintained it. However, better preoperative vision increased the risk of postoperative deterioration, underscoring the need for careful evaluation of surgical indications.</p><p><strong>Key messages: </strong>What is known In vitrectomy for diabetic macular edema (DME), DRCR.net showed that 13-31% of patients experience decreased vision despite reduced edema, leaving the efficacy of vitrectomy uncertain. What is new Our multicenter study demonstrated that vitrectomy with and without cataract surgery was effective in improving central retinal thickness and visual acuity in the patients with DME. Better preoperative visual acuity increased the risk of postoperative decline, and thus the need for careful evaluation of surgical indications.</p>","PeriodicalId":12795,"journal":{"name":"Graefe’s Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Graefe’s Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00417-025-06845-2","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate the efficacy of vitrectomy, with and without cataract surgery, for diabetic macular edema (DME) in Japan.

Method: This retrospective study was conducted at 22 sites in Japan and enrolled patients who underwent vitrectomy either without (VIT group) or with (VIT + CS group) cataract surgery. Central retinal thickness (CRT) and best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) were measured before surgery and at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months after surgery.

Results: A total of 722 patients with DME (482 in the VIT + CS group and 240 in the VIT group) were enrolled. CRT significantly decreased after 1 month and continued thereafter in both groups. BCVA significantly improved at 1 month in the VIT + CS group and at 6 months in the VIT group. In both groups, regardless of epiretinal membrane removal, CRT and BCVA significantly improved, with no additional benefit from concomitant internal limiting membrane peeling. The change in BCVA was significantly correlated with the change in CRT during 6 months postoperatively in all patients and in the VIT group. Patients with worse preoperative visual acuity had a higher likelihood of improved BCVA at 6 and 12 months after surgery. No significant difference in BCVA was observed before and after surgery in patients with a preoperative visual acuity of 20/40 or better. However, in patients with a visual acuity of 20/50 or worse, BCVA significantly improved 1 month after surgery.

Conclusion: Vitrectomy is anatomically and functionally effective for DME, and combined cataract surgery is beneficial in DME cases with cataracts. Patients with poor preoperative BCVA improved, while those with good vision maintained it. However, better preoperative vision increased the risk of postoperative deterioration, underscoring the need for careful evaluation of surgical indications.

Key messages: What is known In vitrectomy for diabetic macular edema (DME), DRCR.net showed that 13-31% of patients experience decreased vision despite reduced edema, leaving the efficacy of vitrectomy uncertain. What is new Our multicenter study demonstrated that vitrectomy with and without cataract surgery was effective in improving central retinal thickness and visual acuity in the patients with DME. Better preoperative visual acuity increased the risk of postoperative decline, and thus the need for careful evaluation of surgical indications.

玻璃体切除术联合或不联合白内障手术治疗糖尿病性黄斑水肿的疗效:日本一年随访的多中心研究。
目的:评价玻璃体切除术合并和不合并白内障手术治疗日本糖尿病性黄斑水肿(DME)的疗效。方法:本回顾性研究在日本的22个地点进行,并纳入了玻璃体切除术患者,包括不进行玻璃体切除术(VIT组)和白内障手术(VIT + CS组)。分别于术前、术后1、3、6、12个月测量视网膜中央厚度(CRT)和最佳矫正视力(BCVA)。结果:共纳入722例DME患者(VIT + CS组482例,VIT组240例)。两组患者1个月后CRT均显著降低,此后持续下降。VIT + CS组1个月和VIT组6个月时BCVA显著改善。在两组中,无论是否切除视网膜前膜,CRT和BCVA均有显著改善,同时伴有内限制膜剥离没有额外的益处。所有患者及VIT组术后6个月BCVA变化与CRT变化显著相关。术前视力较差的患者在术后6个月和12个月BCVA改善的可能性更高。术前视力在20/40及以上的患者手术前后BCVA无显著差异。然而,在视力为20/50或更差的患者中,BCVA在术后1个月显著改善。结论:玻璃体切除术在解剖和功能上是有效的,联合白内障手术对DME合并白内障是有益的。术前BCVA较差的患者BCVA改善,视力良好的患者BCVA维持。然而,术前良好的视力增加了术后恶化的风险,强调需要仔细评估手术指征。在玻璃体切除术治疗糖尿病黄斑水肿(DME)中,DRCR.net显示,13-31%的患者尽管水肿减轻,但视力下降,这使得玻璃体切除术的疗效不确定。我们的多中心研究表明,玻璃体切除术合并或不合并白内障手术对改善DME患者的中央视网膜厚度和视力都是有效的。术前视力较好会增加术后视力下降的风险,因此需要仔细评估手术指征。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
7.40%
发文量
398
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Graefe''s Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology is a distinguished international journal that presents original clinical reports and clini-cally relevant experimental studies. Founded in 1854 by Albrecht von Graefe to serve as a source of useful clinical information and a stimulus for discussion, the journal has published articles by leading ophthalmologists and vision research scientists for more than a century. With peer review by an international Editorial Board and prompt English-language publication, Graefe''s Archive provides rapid dissemination of clinical and clinically related experimental information.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信