Thermal Behavior Variations among Commercial Gutta-percha Brands: An Optical Thermography Study.

Q3 Dentistry
Iranian Endodontic Journal Pub Date : 2025-01-01 Epub Date: 2025-02-26 DOI:10.22037/iej.v20i1.45131
Moisés Uzal, José Aranguren, Alejandro R Pérez, Ana Ramírez-Muñoz, Natalia Navarrete
{"title":"Thermal Behavior Variations among Commercial Gutta-percha Brands: An Optical Thermography Study.","authors":"Moisés Uzal, José Aranguren, Alejandro R Pérez, Ana Ramírez-Muñoz, Natalia Navarrete","doi":"10.22037/iej.v20i1.45131","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>This study aimed to assess the thermal behavior of five different commercial gutta-percha brands using optical thermography. We focused on temperature differences and heat transfer characteristics at different apical distances.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Gutta-percha cones from the following brands were tested: Autofit Greater Taper, Protaper Gold F2, TruNatomy Prime, ZARC Gutta-percha points # 25/0.06, and Reciproc Blue R25. A specific heating system was used to subject the cones to thermal imaging. Measurements were taken at 1-, 2-, 3-, and 4-mm apical distances for 5 mm and 10 mm cone lengths. Statistical analyses included Student's t-tests and Analysis of Variance with the significance level set at 0.05.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Upon intragroup comparison, we found subtle distinctions in thermal behavior when examining gutta-percha cone lengths (5 mm <i>versus</i> 10 mm). TruNatomy exhibited statistically significant variations (<i>P</i><0.05) at 2- and 3-mm distances. Conversely, ZARC and Reciproc Blue R25 displayed notable differences (<i>P</i><0.05) at 2-, 3-, and 4-mm distances. In contrast, Autofit Greater Taper and Protaper Gold F2 consistently diverged across all distances (<i>P</i><0.05). In intergroup comparisons of 5 mm length, significant variances (<i>P</i><0.05) emerged among brands at 1- and 2-mm distances. At 10 mm length, TruNatomy differed significantly (<i>P</i><0.05) from other brands across all distances. The heat tip maintained an average maximum temperature of 154.54<sup>°</sup>C.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Thermal behavior of gutta-percha brands varied significantly, with implications for endodontic treatments. While differences were observed in heat transfer and maximum temperatures, all brands remained within safe temperature ranges for clinical use. Understanding these variations can aid clinicians in selecting appropriate gutta-percha for specific clinical scenarios, ultimately optimizing root canal obturation quality.</p>","PeriodicalId":14534,"journal":{"name":"Iranian Endodontic Journal","volume":"20 1","pages":"e16"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11981000/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Iranian Endodontic Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22037/iej.v20i1.45131","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/26 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Dentistry","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: This study aimed to assess the thermal behavior of five different commercial gutta-percha brands using optical thermography. We focused on temperature differences and heat transfer characteristics at different apical distances.

Materials and methods: Gutta-percha cones from the following brands were tested: Autofit Greater Taper, Protaper Gold F2, TruNatomy Prime, ZARC Gutta-percha points # 25/0.06, and Reciproc Blue R25. A specific heating system was used to subject the cones to thermal imaging. Measurements were taken at 1-, 2-, 3-, and 4-mm apical distances for 5 mm and 10 mm cone lengths. Statistical analyses included Student's t-tests and Analysis of Variance with the significance level set at 0.05.

Results: Upon intragroup comparison, we found subtle distinctions in thermal behavior when examining gutta-percha cone lengths (5 mm versus 10 mm). TruNatomy exhibited statistically significant variations (P<0.05) at 2- and 3-mm distances. Conversely, ZARC and Reciproc Blue R25 displayed notable differences (P<0.05) at 2-, 3-, and 4-mm distances. In contrast, Autofit Greater Taper and Protaper Gold F2 consistently diverged across all distances (P<0.05). In intergroup comparisons of 5 mm length, significant variances (P<0.05) emerged among brands at 1- and 2-mm distances. At 10 mm length, TruNatomy differed significantly (P<0.05) from other brands across all distances. The heat tip maintained an average maximum temperature of 154.54°C.

Conclusion: Thermal behavior of gutta-percha brands varied significantly, with implications for endodontic treatments. While differences were observed in heat transfer and maximum temperatures, all brands remained within safe temperature ranges for clinical use. Understanding these variations can aid clinicians in selecting appropriate gutta-percha for specific clinical scenarios, ultimately optimizing root canal obturation quality.

不同商业品牌杜仲胶的热行为差异:光学热成像研究。
本研究旨在利用光学热成像技术评估五种不同商业品牌的杜仲胶的热行为。研究了不同顶距下的温差和换热特性。材料和方法:测试了以下品牌的杜仲胶锥:Autofit Greater锥度,Protaper Gold F2, TruNatomy Prime, ZARC杜仲胶点# 25/0.06和Reciproc Blue R25。一个特定的加热系统被用来使锥体进行热成像。测量在1-,2-,3-和4-mm的顶端距离为5毫米和10毫米的锥体长度。统计分析包括学生t检验和方差分析,显著性水平为0.05。结果:在组内比较,我们发现在热行为的细微差别时,检查杜仲胶锥长度(5毫米与10毫米)。鼻切开术表现出统计学上显著的差异(PPPPP°C)。结论:不同牌子的杜仲胶的热行为差异显著,对根管治疗有影响。虽然在传热和最高温度方面观察到差异,但所有品牌都保持在临床使用的安全温度范围内。了解这些变化可以帮助临床医生根据具体的临床情况选择合适的杜仲胶,最终优化根管封闭质量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Iranian Endodontic Journal
Iranian Endodontic Journal Dentistry-Dentistry (all)
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Iranian Endodontic Journal (IEJ) is an international peer-reviewed biomedical publication, the aim of which is to provide a scientific medium of communication for researchers throughout the globe. IEJ aims to publish the highest quality articles, both clinical and scientific, on all aspects of Endodontics. The journal is an official Journal of the Iranian Center for Endodontic Research (ICER) and the Iranian Association of Endodontists (IAE). The Journal welcomes articles related to the scientific or applied aspects of endodontics e.g. original researches, systematic reviews, meta-analyses, review articles, clinical trials, case series/reports, hypotheses, letters to the editor, etc. From the beginning (i.e. since 2006), the IEJ was the first open access endodontic journal in the world, which gave readers free and instant access to published articles and enabling them faster discovery of the latest endodontic research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信