Upfront liquid biopsy in patients with advanced solid tumors who were not feasible for tissue-based next-generation sequencing.

IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q3 ONCOLOGY
Akito Fukuda, Takaaki Mizuno, Tatsuya Yoshida, Kuniko Sunami, Takashi Kubo, Takafumi Koyama, Kan Yonemori, Takuji Okusaka, Ken Kato, Yuichiro Ohe, Yasushi Yatabe, Noboru Yamamoto
{"title":"Upfront liquid biopsy in patients with advanced solid tumors who were not feasible for tissue-based next-generation sequencing.","authors":"Akito Fukuda, Takaaki Mizuno, Tatsuya Yoshida, Kuniko Sunami, Takashi Kubo, Takafumi Koyama, Kan Yonemori, Takuji Okusaka, Ken Kato, Yuichiro Ohe, Yasushi Yatabe, Noboru Yamamoto","doi":"10.1093/jjco/hyaf065","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Liquid biopsy has been developed as an alternative to tissue-based sequencing for detecting genomic alterations in solid tumors. However, the clinical utility of liquid biopsy in patients with solid tumors for whom tissue-based next-generation sequencing (NGS) is infeasible has not been well-characterized, particularly in previously untreated individuals.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This prospective study evaluated the clinical impact of liquid biopsy, focusing on six solid tumor types. Overall, 109 patients were enrolled and underwent liquid biopsy using Guardant360 (Guardant Health, Redwood City, CA, USA). Among these, 94 (86.3%) patients were previously untreated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The most common cancer type was non-small cell lung cancer (n = 57, 52.3%), followed by pancreatic (n = 35, 32.1%), biliary tract (n = 8, 7.3%), gastric (n = 5, 4.6%), colorectal (n = 3, 2.8%), and triple-negative breast (n = 1, 0.9%) cancers. The success rate of liquid biopsy was 99.1%, and the median turnaround time from blood collection to results was 7 days (range: 5-22 days). Actionable alterations were detected in 31 (28.4%) patients, and 8.3% of them received matched therapy based on alterations identified by liquid biopsy. Among previously untreated patients, actionable mutations were identified in 29.8%, and 8.5% received matched therapy.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In patients with advanced solid tumors for which tissue-based NGS is not feasible, performing upfront liquid biopsy could lead to the detection of actionable alterations and help guide targeted therapies.</p><p><strong>Clinical trial registry: </strong>UMIN Clinical Trials Registry (UMIN000041722).</p>","PeriodicalId":14656,"journal":{"name":"Japanese journal of clinical oncology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Japanese journal of clinical oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jjco/hyaf065","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Liquid biopsy has been developed as an alternative to tissue-based sequencing for detecting genomic alterations in solid tumors. However, the clinical utility of liquid biopsy in patients with solid tumors for whom tissue-based next-generation sequencing (NGS) is infeasible has not been well-characterized, particularly in previously untreated individuals.

Methods: This prospective study evaluated the clinical impact of liquid biopsy, focusing on six solid tumor types. Overall, 109 patients were enrolled and underwent liquid biopsy using Guardant360 (Guardant Health, Redwood City, CA, USA). Among these, 94 (86.3%) patients were previously untreated.

Results: The most common cancer type was non-small cell lung cancer (n = 57, 52.3%), followed by pancreatic (n = 35, 32.1%), biliary tract (n = 8, 7.3%), gastric (n = 5, 4.6%), colorectal (n = 3, 2.8%), and triple-negative breast (n = 1, 0.9%) cancers. The success rate of liquid biopsy was 99.1%, and the median turnaround time from blood collection to results was 7 days (range: 5-22 days). Actionable alterations were detected in 31 (28.4%) patients, and 8.3% of them received matched therapy based on alterations identified by liquid biopsy. Among previously untreated patients, actionable mutations were identified in 29.8%, and 8.5% received matched therapy.

Conclusions: In patients with advanced solid tumors for which tissue-based NGS is not feasible, performing upfront liquid biopsy could lead to the detection of actionable alterations and help guide targeted therapies.

Clinical trial registry: UMIN Clinical Trials Registry (UMIN000041722).

无法进行基于组织的下一代测序的晚期实体瘤患者的前期液体活检。
背景:液体活检已经发展成为一种替代基于组织的测序来检测实体肿瘤的基因组改变。然而,液体活检在实体肿瘤患者(基于组织的下一代测序(NGS)不可行的患者)的临床应用尚未得到很好的表征,特别是在先前未经治疗的个体中。方法:本前瞻性研究评估液体活检的临床影响,重点关注六种实体瘤类型。总的来说,109名患者入组并使用guarant360 (Guardant Health, Redwood City, CA, USA)进行了液体活检。其中94例(86.3%)患者此前未接受治疗。结果:最常见的肿瘤类型为非小细胞肺癌(n = 57, 52.3%),其次为胰腺癌(n = 35, 32.1%)、胆道癌(n = 8, 7.3%)、胃癌(n = 5, 4.6%)、结直肠癌(n = 3, 2.8%)和三阴性乳腺癌(n = 1, 0.9%)。液体活检成功率为99.1%,从采血到结果的中位周转时间为7天(范围:5-22天)。在31例(28.4%)患者中检测到可操作的改变,其中8.3%的患者接受了基于液体活检确定的改变的匹配治疗。在先前未接受治疗的患者中,29.8%的患者发现了可操作的突变,8.5%的患者接受了匹配治疗。结论:对于无法进行基于组织的NGS的晚期实体瘤患者,预先进行液体活检可以发现可操作的改变并帮助指导靶向治疗。临床试验注册:UMIN临床试验注册(UMIN000041722)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
8.30%
发文量
177
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Japanese Journal of Clinical Oncology is a multidisciplinary journal for clinical oncologists which strives to publish high quality manuscripts addressing medical oncology, clinical trials, radiology, surgery, basic research, and palliative care. The journal aims to contribute to the world"s scientific community with special attention to the area of clinical oncology and the Asian region. JJCO publishes various articles types including: ・Original Articles ・Case Reports ・Clinical Trial Notes ・Cancer Genetics Reports ・Epidemiology Notes ・Technical Notes ・Short Communications ・Letters to the Editors ・Solicited Reviews
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信