Evaluating the susceptibility to ceftazidime-avibactam in clinical isolates of Klebsiella pneumoniae and Pseudomonas aeruginosa recovered from an apex medical hospital in north India.

IF 1.3 Q4 MICROBIOLOGY
Nargis Bali, Tufail Ahmed, Biswajyoti Borkakoty, Roseleen Bali, Anjum Ara Mir, Zubair Teli, Qounser Nisar, Tantray Faisal
{"title":"Evaluating the susceptibility to ceftazidime-avibactam in clinical isolates of <i>Klebsiella pneumoniae</i> and <i>Pseudomonas aeruginosa</i> recovered from an apex medical hospital in north India.","authors":"Nargis Bali, Tufail Ahmed, Biswajyoti Borkakoty, Roseleen Bali, Anjum Ara Mir, Zubair Teli, Qounser Nisar, Tantray Faisal","doi":"10.18502/ijm.v17i2.18385","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>We assessed the susceptibility of ceftazidime+avibactam (CZA/AVI) in <i>Klebsiella pneumoniae</i> and <i>Pseudomonas aeruginosa</i> isolated from intensive care units of our hospital.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Clinical samples from Jan 2022 to Dec 2023 at SKIMS Soura, were processed for the recovery of <i>K. pneumoniae</i> and <i>P. aeruginosa</i>. Susceptibility testing was done by disc diffusion (DD) method and minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) for CZA/AVI and meropenem was assessed using E-test strips. Categorical agreement (CA), very major errors (VME), major errors (ME) and minor errors (mE) between DD and MIC were measured. Statistical analyses were performed using SPSS version 22.0.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 111 <i>K. pneumoniae</i> and 81 <i>P. aeruginosa</i> were part of the study. Of these, 56.8% <i>K. pneumoniae</i> and 45.7% <i>P. aeruginosa</i> isolates were susceptible to CZA/AVI. MIC of CZA/AVI for <i>K. pneumoniae</i> ranged from 0.125 to ≥ 256 μg/ml and for <i>P. aeruginosa</i> it ranged from 0.032 to 128 μg/ml. CA was 97.29% between DD and E-Test for CZA/AVI in <i>K. pneumoniae</i> isolates, with a ME of 2.70%. For <i>P. aeruginosa</i> CA between DD and E-Test for CZA/AVI was 98.76% with a VME of 1.23%. MIC values of meropenem were higher than CZA/AVI even in sensitive isolates.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>CZA/AVI shows good in-vitro activity against clinical isolates of <i>K. pneumoniae</i> and <i>P. aeruginosa</i> and can be part of empirical therapy for treating infections caused by these bacteria.</p>","PeriodicalId":14633,"journal":{"name":"Iranian Journal of Microbiology","volume":"17 2","pages":"253-260"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12053426/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Iranian Journal of Microbiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18502/ijm.v17i2.18385","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MICROBIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and objectives: We assessed the susceptibility of ceftazidime+avibactam (CZA/AVI) in Klebsiella pneumoniae and Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolated from intensive care units of our hospital.

Materials and methods: Clinical samples from Jan 2022 to Dec 2023 at SKIMS Soura, were processed for the recovery of K. pneumoniae and P. aeruginosa. Susceptibility testing was done by disc diffusion (DD) method and minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) for CZA/AVI and meropenem was assessed using E-test strips. Categorical agreement (CA), very major errors (VME), major errors (ME) and minor errors (mE) between DD and MIC were measured. Statistical analyses were performed using SPSS version 22.0.

Results: A total of 111 K. pneumoniae and 81 P. aeruginosa were part of the study. Of these, 56.8% K. pneumoniae and 45.7% P. aeruginosa isolates were susceptible to CZA/AVI. MIC of CZA/AVI for K. pneumoniae ranged from 0.125 to ≥ 256 μg/ml and for P. aeruginosa it ranged from 0.032 to 128 μg/ml. CA was 97.29% between DD and E-Test for CZA/AVI in K. pneumoniae isolates, with a ME of 2.70%. For P. aeruginosa CA between DD and E-Test for CZA/AVI was 98.76% with a VME of 1.23%. MIC values of meropenem were higher than CZA/AVI even in sensitive isolates.

Conclusion: CZA/AVI shows good in-vitro activity against clinical isolates of K. pneumoniae and P. aeruginosa and can be part of empirical therapy for treating infections caused by these bacteria.

评价印度北部某顶级医院临床分离肺炎克雷伯菌和铜绿假单胞菌对头孢他啶-阿维巴坦的敏感性。
背景与目的:评估头孢他啶+阿维巴坦(CZA/AVI)对我院重症监护病房分离的肺炎克雷伯菌和铜绿假单胞菌的敏感性。材料与方法:对2022年1月至2023年12月SKIMS Soura的临床样本进行处理,回收肺炎克雷伯菌和铜绿假单胞菌。药敏试验采用碟扩散法(DD),最低抑菌浓度(MIC)采用e试纸条测定CZA/AVI和美罗培南。测量DD和MIC之间的绝对一致性(CA)、非常严重错误(VME)、严重错误(ME)和轻微错误(ME)。采用SPSS 22.0进行统计分析。结果:共检出肺炎克雷伯菌111例,铜绿假单胞菌81例。其中56.8%的肺炎克雷伯菌和45.7%的铜绿假单胞菌对CZA/AVI敏感。CZA/AVI对肺炎克雷伯菌的MIC范围为0.125 ~≥256 μg/ml,对铜绿假单胞菌的MIC范围为0.032 ~ 128 μg/ml。肺炎克雷伯菌分离株CZA/AVI DD和E-Test的CA为97.29%,ME为2.70%。P.铜绿假单胞菌(P. aeruginosa) CZA/AVI的DD和E-Test之间CA为98.76%,VME为1.23%。敏感株美罗培南的MIC值高于CZA/AVI。结论:CZA/AVI对临床分离的肺炎克雷伯菌和铜绿假单胞菌具有良好的体外活性,可作为治疗这两种细菌感染的经验疗法的一部分。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
7.10%
发文量
96
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Iranian Journal of Microbiology (IJM) is an international, multi-disciplinary, peer-reviewed journal that provides rapid publication of the most advanced scientific research in the areas of basic and applied research on bacteria and other micro-organisms, including bacteria, viruses, yeasts, fungi, microalgae, and protozoa concerning the development of tools for diagnosis and disease control, epidemiology, antimicrobial agents, clinical microbiology, immunology, Genetics, Genomics and Molecular Biology. Contributions may be in the form of original research papers, review articles, short communications, case reports, technical reports, and letters to the Editor. Research findings must be novel and the original data must be available for review by the Editors, if necessary. Studies that are preliminary, of weak originality or merely descriptive as well as negative results are not appropriate for the journal. Papers considered for publication must be unpublished work (except in an abstract form) that is not under consideration for publication anywhere else, and all co-authors should have agreed to the submission. Manuscripts should be written in English.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信