A novel composite model for distinguishing benign and malignant pulmonary nodules.

IF 3.2 4区 医学 Q2 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL
Lei Zhang, Yanhui Xu, Qinqin Lou, Fangfang Chen, Fang Li, Kun Chai, Junshun Gao, Mingjie Tong, Yan Ma, Lilong Xia, Kaixiang Zhao, Junli Gao, Xinhai Zhu
{"title":"A novel composite model for distinguishing benign and malignant pulmonary nodules.","authors":"Lei Zhang, Yanhui Xu, Qinqin Lou, Fangfang Chen, Fang Li, Kun Chai, Junshun Gao, Mingjie Tong, Yan Ma, Lilong Xia, Kaixiang Zhao, Junli Gao, Xinhai Zhu","doi":"10.1007/s10238-025-01672-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Previous studies have demonstrated that a four-protein marker panel (4MP), consisting of Pro-SFTPB, CA125, Cyfra21-1, and CEA could be used to identify benign and malignant lung nodules. This study aims to improve the 4MP's performance by combining clinical characteristics and low-dose chest computed tomography (LDCT) screening features. This study involved 380 patients with pulmonary nodules, diagnosing 91 benign and 289 early-stage lung cancer via postoperative histopathology. Serum levels of Pro-SFTPB, CA125, Cyfra21-1, and CEA were assessed using an immunofluorescence assay. Clinical features were selected using the LassoCV method. A new diagnostic model was developed using logistic regression, incorporating 4MP, clinical characteristics, and LDCT features. The model's diagnostic performance was compared to the lung cancer biomarker panel (LCBP) nodule risk model, and evaluated through sensitivity, specificity, and the AUC value. The AUC values for distinguishing between benign and malignant pulmonary nodules were 0.612 for the 4MP model. We screened out 7 factors of patient clinical information and CT features of nodules. The composite model (4MP + age + gender + BMI + family history of cancer + nodule size + nodule margin + nodule density) achieved an AUC of 0.808, especially for small nodules (AUC = 0.835 for nodules ≤ 6 mm). Furthermore, within the same validation cohort, the performance of the composite model (AUC = 0.680) surpassed that of the LCBP nodule risk model (AUC = 0.599). The novel composite model accurately diagnoses malignant pulmonary nodules, especially small ones, helping to stratify patients by lung cancer risk.</p>","PeriodicalId":10337,"journal":{"name":"Clinical and Experimental Medicine","volume":"25 1","pages":"159"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12078401/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical and Experimental Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10238-025-01672-5","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Previous studies have demonstrated that a four-protein marker panel (4MP), consisting of Pro-SFTPB, CA125, Cyfra21-1, and CEA could be used to identify benign and malignant lung nodules. This study aims to improve the 4MP's performance by combining clinical characteristics and low-dose chest computed tomography (LDCT) screening features. This study involved 380 patients with pulmonary nodules, diagnosing 91 benign and 289 early-stage lung cancer via postoperative histopathology. Serum levels of Pro-SFTPB, CA125, Cyfra21-1, and CEA were assessed using an immunofluorescence assay. Clinical features were selected using the LassoCV method. A new diagnostic model was developed using logistic regression, incorporating 4MP, clinical characteristics, and LDCT features. The model's diagnostic performance was compared to the lung cancer biomarker panel (LCBP) nodule risk model, and evaluated through sensitivity, specificity, and the AUC value. The AUC values for distinguishing between benign and malignant pulmonary nodules were 0.612 for the 4MP model. We screened out 7 factors of patient clinical information and CT features of nodules. The composite model (4MP + age + gender + BMI + family history of cancer + nodule size + nodule margin + nodule density) achieved an AUC of 0.808, especially for small nodules (AUC = 0.835 for nodules ≤ 6 mm). Furthermore, within the same validation cohort, the performance of the composite model (AUC = 0.680) surpassed that of the LCBP nodule risk model (AUC = 0.599). The novel composite model accurately diagnoses malignant pulmonary nodules, especially small ones, helping to stratify patients by lung cancer risk.

一种区分肺良恶性结节的新型复合模型。
先前的研究表明,由Pro-SFTPB、CA125、Cyfra21-1和CEA组成的四蛋白标记面板(4MP)可用于鉴别肺结节的良恶性。本研究旨在结合临床特点和低剂量胸部计算机断层扫描(LDCT)筛查特点,提高4MP的性能。本研究共纳入380例肺结节患者,经术后组织病理学诊断为良性91例,早期肺癌289例。采用免疫荧光法测定血清中Pro-SFTPB、CA125、Cyfra21-1和CEA的水平。采用LassoCV法选择临床特征。采用逻辑回归,结合4MP、临床特征和LDCT特征,建立了一个新的诊断模型。将该模型的诊断性能与肺癌生物标志物面板(LCBP)结节风险模型进行比较,并通过敏感性、特异性和AUC值进行评估。4MP模型肺结节良恶性鉴别的AUC值为0.612。我们筛选出患者临床资料和结节CT表现的7个因素。复合模型(4MP +年龄+性别+ BMI +癌症家族史+结节大小+结节边缘+结节密度)的AUC为0.808,尤其是小结节(≤6 mm的结节AUC = 0.835)。此外,在同一验证队列中,复合模型的性能(AUC = 0.680)优于LCBP结节风险模型(AUC = 0.599)。该模型能够准确地诊断出恶性肺结节,特别是小结节,有助于根据肺癌风险对患者进行分层。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Clinical and Experimental Medicine
Clinical and Experimental Medicine 医学-医学:研究与实验
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
2.20%
发文量
159
审稿时长
2.5 months
期刊介绍: Clinical and Experimental Medicine (CEM) is a multidisciplinary journal that aims to be a forum of scientific excellence and information exchange in relation to the basic and clinical features of the following fields: hematology, onco-hematology, oncology, virology, immunology, and rheumatology. The journal publishes reviews and editorials, experimental and preclinical studies, translational research, prospectively designed clinical trials, and epidemiological studies. Papers containing new clinical or experimental data that are likely to contribute to changes in clinical practice or the way in which a disease is thought about will be given priority due to their immediate importance. Case reports will be accepted on an exceptional basis only, and their submission is discouraged. The major criteria for publication are clarity, scientific soundness, and advances in knowledge. In compliance with the overwhelmingly prevailing request by the international scientific community, and with respect for eco-compatibility issues, CEM is now published exclusively online.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信