Mental health and psychosocial outcomes in survivors of severe cutaneous adverse reactions: a scoping review.

IF 2.8 4区 医学 Q1 DERMATOLOGY
Suyeon Hong, Joyce Quon, Caroline A Nelson
{"title":"Mental health and psychosocial outcomes in survivors of severe cutaneous adverse reactions: a scoping review.","authors":"Suyeon Hong, Joyce Quon, Caroline A Nelson","doi":"10.1093/ced/llaf202","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Severe cutaneous adverse reactions (SCARs) are rare drug-induced eruptions, most notably Stevens-Johnson syndrome-toxic epidermal necrolysis (SJS-TEN) and drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms (DRESS). Their psychological impact is increasingly recognized, with UK guidelines for SJS-TEN recommending psychological evaluation, and a continuing medical education review for DRESS recommending monitoring for anxiety, depression and post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) for 1 year. However, monitoring for adverse psychosocial outcomes has not been standardized. This scoping review aims to characterize the existing literature on psychosocial outcomes in survivors of SCARs and highlight gaps in knowledge. Following the Joanna Briggs Institute guidelines, we searched MEDLINE, Embase and PsycInfo for primary literature using terms related to SCARs and psychosocial outcomes. After screening 865 records, 24 studies were included. Of these studies, 88% investigated SJS-TEN and 21% addressed DRESS. In total, 44-54% and 21-44% of survivors of SJS-TEN and 36-63% and 50% of survivors of DRESS screened positive for anxiety and depression, respectively, on the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale. Overall, 17-51% of survivors of SJS-TEN and 50% of survivors of DRESS had scores indicating PTSD using variations of the Impact of Events Scale. Quality of life, fear of medications and altered relationships with medical providers were also frequently identified. The heterogeneity in outcome measures underscores the need for a specific, standardized tool to assess for psychosocial complications in survivors of SCARs. This review highlights needs for improved psychosocial support in survivors of SJS-TEN and DRESS, as well as research into psychosocial outcomes in unexplored SCARs such as acute generalized exanthematous pustulosis and generalized bullous fixed drug eruption.</p>","PeriodicalId":10324,"journal":{"name":"Clinical and Experimental Dermatology","volume":" ","pages":"1755-1765"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical and Experimental Dermatology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ced/llaf202","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DERMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Severe cutaneous adverse reactions (SCARs) are rare drug-induced eruptions, most notably Stevens-Johnson syndrome-toxic epidermal necrolysis (SJS-TEN) and drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms (DRESS). Their psychological impact is increasingly recognized, with UK guidelines for SJS-TEN recommending psychological evaluation, and a continuing medical education review for DRESS recommending monitoring for anxiety, depression and post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) for 1 year. However, monitoring for adverse psychosocial outcomes has not been standardized. This scoping review aims to characterize the existing literature on psychosocial outcomes in survivors of SCARs and highlight gaps in knowledge. Following the Joanna Briggs Institute guidelines, we searched MEDLINE, Embase and PsycInfo for primary literature using terms related to SCARs and psychosocial outcomes. After screening 865 records, 24 studies were included. Of these studies, 88% investigated SJS-TEN and 21% addressed DRESS. In total, 44-54% and 21-44% of survivors of SJS-TEN and 36-63% and 50% of survivors of DRESS screened positive for anxiety and depression, respectively, on the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale. Overall, 17-51% of survivors of SJS-TEN and 50% of survivors of DRESS had scores indicating PTSD using variations of the Impact of Events Scale. Quality of life, fear of medications and altered relationships with medical providers were also frequently identified. The heterogeneity in outcome measures underscores the need for a specific, standardized tool to assess for psychosocial complications in survivors of SCARs. This review highlights needs for improved psychosocial support in survivors of SJS-TEN and DRESS, as well as research into psychosocial outcomes in unexplored SCARs such as acute generalized exanthematous pustulosis and generalized bullous fixed drug eruption.

严重皮肤不良反应幸存者的心理健康和社会心理结局:一项范围综述
严重皮肤不良反应(疤痕)是罕见的药物引起的皮疹,最明显的是史蒂文斯-约翰逊综合征毒性表皮坏死松解(SJS-TEN)和药物反应伴嗜酸性粒细胞增多和全身症状(DRESS)。他们的心理影响越来越被认识到,英国SJS-TEN指南建议进行心理评估,DRESS继续医学教育综述建议对焦虑、抑郁和创伤后应激障碍(PTSD)进行一年的监测。然而,对不良社会心理结果的监测尚未标准化。本综述旨在描述SCAR幸存者心理社会结局的现有文献,并强调知识上的空白。按照乔安娜布里格斯研究所的指导方针,我们检索了MEDLINE、Embase和PsycInfo,查找与疤痕和心理社会结果相关的主要文献。在筛选865份记录后,纳入了24项研究。88%的研究关注SJS-TEN, 21%的研究关注DRESS。在医院焦虑和抑郁量表上,分别有44-54%和21-44%的SJS-TEN幸存者和36-63%和50%的DRESS幸存者筛查出焦虑和抑郁阳性。使用不同的事件影响量表,17-51%的SJS-TEN幸存者和50%的DRESS幸存者的得分表明PTSD。生活质量、对药物的恐惧以及与医疗提供者关系的改变也经常被发现。结果测量的异质性强调了需要一种特定的、标准化的工具来评估SCAR幸存者的社会心理并发症。这篇综述强调了SJS-TEN和DRESS幸存者需要改善的社会心理支持,以及未探索疤痕的社会心理结局研究,如急性全发性脓疱病和全发性大疱性固定药疹。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
2.40%
发文量
389
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Clinical and Experimental Dermatology (CED) is a unique provider of relevant and educational material for practising clinicians and dermatological researchers. We support continuing professional development (CPD) of dermatology specialists to advance the understanding, management and treatment of skin disease in order to improve patient outcomes.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信