Fine-Tuning Deep Learning Model for Quantitative Knee Joint Mapping With MR Fingerprinting and Its Comparison to Dictionary Matching Method: Fine-Tuning Deep Learning Model for Quantitative MRF.

IF 2.7 4区 医学 Q2 BIOPHYSICS
Xiaoxia Zhang, Hector L de Moura, Anmol Monga, Marcelo V W Zibetti, Ravinder R Regatte
{"title":"Fine-Tuning Deep Learning Model for Quantitative Knee Joint Mapping With MR Fingerprinting and Its Comparison to Dictionary Matching Method: Fine-Tuning Deep Learning Model for Quantitative MRF.","authors":"Xiaoxia Zhang, Hector L de Moura, Anmol Monga, Marcelo V W Zibetti, Ravinder R Regatte","doi":"10.1002/nbm.70045","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Magnetic resonance fingerprinting (MRF), as an emerging versatile and noninvasive imaging technique, provides simultaneous quantification of multiple quantitative MRI parameters, which have been used to detect changes in cartilage composition and structure in osteoarthritis. Deep learning (DL)-based methods for quantification mapping in MRF overcome the memory constraints and offer faster processing compared to the conventional dictionary matching (DM) method. However, limited attention has been given to the fine-tuning of neural networks (NNs) in DL and fair comparison with DM. In this study, we investigate the impact of training parameter choices on NN performance and compare the fine-tuned NN with DM for multiparametric mapping in MRF. Our approach includes optimizing NN hyperparameters, analyzing the singular value decomposition (SVD) components of MRF data, and optimization of the DM method. We conducted experiments on synthetic data, the NIST/ISMRM MRI system phantom with ground truth, and in vivo knee data from 14 healthy volunteers. The results demonstrate the critical importance of selecting appropriate training parameters, as these significantly affect NN performance. The findings also show that NNs improve the accuracy and robustness of T<sub>1</sub>, T<sub>2</sub>, and T<sub>1ρ</sub> mappings compared to DM in synthetic datasets. For in vivo knee data, the NN achieved comparable results for T<sub>1</sub>, with slightly lower T<sub>2</sub> and slightly higher T<sub>1ρ</sub> measurements compared to DM. In conclusion, the fine-tuned NN can be used to increase accuracy and robustness for multiparametric quantitative mapping from MRF of the knee joint.</p>","PeriodicalId":19309,"journal":{"name":"NMR in Biomedicine","volume":"38 6","pages":"e70045"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12129367/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"NMR in Biomedicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/nbm.70045","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BIOPHYSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Magnetic resonance fingerprinting (MRF), as an emerging versatile and noninvasive imaging technique, provides simultaneous quantification of multiple quantitative MRI parameters, which have been used to detect changes in cartilage composition and structure in osteoarthritis. Deep learning (DL)-based methods for quantification mapping in MRF overcome the memory constraints and offer faster processing compared to the conventional dictionary matching (DM) method. However, limited attention has been given to the fine-tuning of neural networks (NNs) in DL and fair comparison with DM. In this study, we investigate the impact of training parameter choices on NN performance and compare the fine-tuned NN with DM for multiparametric mapping in MRF. Our approach includes optimizing NN hyperparameters, analyzing the singular value decomposition (SVD) components of MRF data, and optimization of the DM method. We conducted experiments on synthetic data, the NIST/ISMRM MRI system phantom with ground truth, and in vivo knee data from 14 healthy volunteers. The results demonstrate the critical importance of selecting appropriate training parameters, as these significantly affect NN performance. The findings also show that NNs improve the accuracy and robustness of T1, T2, and T mappings compared to DM in synthetic datasets. For in vivo knee data, the NN achieved comparable results for T1, with slightly lower T2 and slightly higher T measurements compared to DM. In conclusion, the fine-tuned NN can be used to increase accuracy and robustness for multiparametric quantitative mapping from MRF of the knee joint.

基于MR指纹的膝关节定量映射的微调深度学习模型及其与字典匹配方法的比较:定量MRF的微调深度学习模型。
磁共振指纹(MRF)作为一种新兴的多用途和无创成像技术,提供了多个定量MRI参数的同时量化,已被用于检测骨关节炎软骨组成和结构的变化。与传统的字典匹配(DM)方法相比,基于深度学习(DL)的MRF量化映射方法克服了内存限制,提供了更快的处理速度。然而,人们对深度学习中神经网络(NN)的微调以及与DM的公平比较的关注有限。在本研究中,我们研究了训练参数选择对NN性能的影响,并将微调后的NN与DM在MRF中的多参数映射进行了比较。我们的方法包括优化神经网络超参数,分析MRF数据的奇异值分解(SVD)成分,以及优化DM方法。我们对来自14名健康志愿者的合成数据、NIST/ISMRM MRI系统模拟的地面真实数据和体内膝关节数据进行了实验。结果表明,选择合适的训练参数至关重要,因为这些参数会显著影响神经网络的性能。研究结果还表明,与合成数据集中的DM相比,神经网络提高了T1、T2和T1ρ映射的准确性和鲁棒性。对于体内膝关节数据,与DM相比,神经网络在T1上取得了相当的结果,其T2值略低,T1ρ值略高。总之,微调神经网络可用于提高膝关节MRF多参数定量映射的准确性和鲁棒性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
NMR in Biomedicine
NMR in Biomedicine 医学-光谱学
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
10.30%
发文量
209
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: NMR in Biomedicine is a journal devoted to the publication of original full-length papers, rapid communications and review articles describing the development of magnetic resonance spectroscopy or imaging methods or their use to investigate physiological, biochemical, biophysical or medical problems. Topics for submitted papers should be in one of the following general categories: (a) development of methods and instrumentation for MR of biological systems; (b) studies of normal or diseased organs, tissues or cells; (c) diagnosis or treatment of disease. Reports may cover work on patients or healthy human subjects, in vivo animal experiments, studies of isolated organs or cultured cells, analysis of tissue extracts, NMR theory, experimental techniques, or instrumentation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信