Efficacy of Mediterranean Diet vs. Low-FODMAP Diet in Patients With Nonconstipated Irritable Bowel Syndrome: A Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial.

IF 2.9 3区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Neurogastroenterology and Motility Pub Date : 2025-10-01 Epub Date: 2025-04-24 DOI:10.1111/nmo.70060
Prashant Singh, Gregory Dean, Sofia Iram, Westley Peng, Samuel W Chey, Samara Rifkin, Christine Lothen-Kline, Jane Muir, Allen A Lee, Shanti Eswaran, William D Chey
{"title":"Efficacy of Mediterranean Diet vs. Low-FODMAP Diet in Patients With Nonconstipated Irritable Bowel Syndrome: A Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial.","authors":"Prashant Singh, Gregory Dean, Sofia Iram, Westley Peng, Samuel W Chey, Samara Rifkin, Christine Lothen-Kline, Jane Muir, Allen A Lee, Shanti Eswaran, William D Chey","doi":"10.1111/nmo.70060","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Mediterranean diet (MD) has been proposed as a dietary therapy for irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) but its efficacy remains unclear. We compared the efficacy of MD to a diet low in fermentable oligo-, di-, monosaccharides, and polyols (LFD).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this pilot-feasibility, randomized controlled trial (RCT), adult patients with diarrhea-predominant IBS (IBS-D) or mixed bowel pattern (IBS-M) were randomized to MD versus LFD for 4 weeks. Meals were provided for both groups (ModifyHealth, GA). Daily variables included abdominal pain intensity (API) and bloating, while IBS symptom severity score (IBS-SSS) and IBS adequate relief (IBS-AR) were scored weekly. The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients with ≥ 30% decrease in API for ≥ 2/4 weeks.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 26 randomized patients, 20 finished the study (10 per group). Seventy-three percent of the MD group met the primary endpoint compared to 81.8% of the LFD group (p = 1.0). Although not statistically significant, a numerically higher proportion of the LFD group reported adequate relief and met the responder endpoint for IBS-SSS (50-point reduction) compared to the MD group (54.6% vs. 27.3% for IBS-AR and 81.8% vs. 45.5% for IBS-SSS, p = 0.39 and 0.18, respectively). The LFD group also had a significantly greater reduction in IBS-SSS score over the 4-week treatment period compared to the MD group (-105.5 vs. -60, p = 0.02).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>MD provides symptom relief in IBS-D and IBS-M; however, the magnitude of relief was higher with the LFD. Larger diet comparison studies in real-world settings are needed before MD can be routinely recommended to IBS patients.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>Clinicaltrials.gov: NCT05807919.</p>","PeriodicalId":19123,"journal":{"name":"Neurogastroenterology and Motility","volume":" ","pages":"e70060"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12435798/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neurogastroenterology and Motility","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/nmo.70060","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/4/24 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Mediterranean diet (MD) has been proposed as a dietary therapy for irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) but its efficacy remains unclear. We compared the efficacy of MD to a diet low in fermentable oligo-, di-, monosaccharides, and polyols (LFD).

Methods: In this pilot-feasibility, randomized controlled trial (RCT), adult patients with diarrhea-predominant IBS (IBS-D) or mixed bowel pattern (IBS-M) were randomized to MD versus LFD for 4 weeks. Meals were provided for both groups (ModifyHealth, GA). Daily variables included abdominal pain intensity (API) and bloating, while IBS symptom severity score (IBS-SSS) and IBS adequate relief (IBS-AR) were scored weekly. The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients with ≥ 30% decrease in API for ≥ 2/4 weeks.

Results: Of 26 randomized patients, 20 finished the study (10 per group). Seventy-three percent of the MD group met the primary endpoint compared to 81.8% of the LFD group (p = 1.0). Although not statistically significant, a numerically higher proportion of the LFD group reported adequate relief and met the responder endpoint for IBS-SSS (50-point reduction) compared to the MD group (54.6% vs. 27.3% for IBS-AR and 81.8% vs. 45.5% for IBS-SSS, p = 0.39 and 0.18, respectively). The LFD group also had a significantly greater reduction in IBS-SSS score over the 4-week treatment period compared to the MD group (-105.5 vs. -60, p = 0.02).

Conclusion: MD provides symptom relief in IBS-D and IBS-M; however, the magnitude of relief was higher with the LFD. Larger diet comparison studies in real-world settings are needed before MD can be routinely recommended to IBS patients.

Trial registration: Clinicaltrials.gov: NCT05807919.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

地中海饮食与低fodmap饮食对非便秘型肠易激综合征患者的疗效:一项随机对照试验
简介:地中海饮食(MD)已被提出作为肠易激综合征(IBS)的一种饮食疗法,但其疗效尚不清楚。我们比较了MD与低发酵寡糖、二糖、单糖和多元醇(LFD)的日粮的功效。方法:在这项试点可行性随机对照试验(RCT)中,以腹泻为主的IBS (IBS- d)或混合型肠型(IBS- m)的成年患者随机分为MD组和LFD组,为期4周。两组均提供膳食(ModifyHealth, GA)。每日变量包括腹痛强度(API)和腹胀,而IBS症状严重程度评分(IBS- sss)和IBS充分缓解(IBS- ar)每周进行评分。主要终点是API下降≥30%且持续≥2/4周的患者比例。结果:26例随机患者中,20例完成研究(每组10例)。73%的MD组达到了主要终点,而LFD组为81.8% (p = 1.0)。虽然没有统计学意义,但与MD组相比,LFD组报告充分缓解并达到IBS-SSS反应终点的比例更高(IBS-AR为54.6%比27.3%,IBS-SSS为81.8%比45.5%,p分别= 0.39和0.18)。与MD组相比,LFD组在4周治疗期间IBS-SSS评分的降低幅度也更大(-105.5 vs -60, p = 0.02)。结论:MD可缓解IBS-D和IBS-M患者的症状;然而,LFD的缓解幅度更高。在向肠易激综合征患者常规推荐MD之前,需要在现实环境中进行更大规模的饮食比较研究。试验注册:Clinicaltrials.gov: NCT05807919。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Neurogastroenterology and Motility
Neurogastroenterology and Motility 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
7.80
自引率
8.60%
发文量
178
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Neurogastroenterology & Motility (NMO) is the official Journal of the European Society of Neurogastroenterology & Motility (ESNM) and the American Neurogastroenterology and Motility Society (ANMS). It is edited by James Galligan, Albert Bredenoord, and Stephen Vanner. The editorial and peer review process is independent of the societies affiliated to the journal and publisher: Neither the ANMS, the ESNM or the Publisher have editorial decision-making power. Whenever these are relevant to the content being considered or published, the editors, journal management committee and editorial board declare their interests and affiliations.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信