Identifying and Understanding Seizure Liability in Drug Development.

IF 1.2 4区 医学 Q4 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
International Journal of Toxicology Pub Date : 2025-03-01 Epub Date: 2025-01-06 DOI:10.1177/10915818241307851
Katie Sokolowski, Laura Erwin, Judy Liu, Simon Authier, Owen McMaster, Brandon Pressly, Brad Bolon, Marcus S Delatte
{"title":"Identifying and Understanding Seizure Liability in Drug Development.","authors":"Katie Sokolowski, Laura Erwin, Judy Liu, Simon Authier, Owen McMaster, Brandon Pressly, Brad Bolon, Marcus S Delatte","doi":"10.1177/10915818241307851","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Seizures are complex electrophysiological disturbances affecting one or more populations of brain neurons. Seizures following test article (TA) exposure pose significant challenges in drug development. This paper considers the diverse neurological manifestations, mechanisms, and functional and structural assessments needed to investigate TA-related seizure liabilities, with a particular focus on nonclinical species. Accurate discrimination of seizures from convulsions (irregular involuntary body and/or limb movements) and the nuanced presentation of different seizure types (partial vs. general) and phases (prodromal, ictal, and postictal) are essential for discerning their clinical implications. In nonclinical safety testing, the most direct evaluation method to confirm existence of seizures is electroencephalography (EEG) while clinical endpoints (e.g., functional observational batteries [FOB], comprehensive neurological examinations) and neuropathological findings (e.g., neuronal necrosis in tissue sections, raised biomarker levels in cerebrospinal fluid or serum) can indicate a seizure liability and provide additional guidance to identify the origin, frequency, and severity of seizures needed to align nonclinical effects with clinical relevance. In general, the regulatory perspective is that seizures identified in nonclinical species as well as potential risk management strategies (e.g., safety margin considerations, dosing paradigms, and clinical monitoring) translate effectively for purposes of clinical risk assessment.</p>","PeriodicalId":14432,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Toxicology","volume":"44 2","pages":"99-124"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Toxicology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10915818241307851","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/6 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Seizures are complex electrophysiological disturbances affecting one or more populations of brain neurons. Seizures following test article (TA) exposure pose significant challenges in drug development. This paper considers the diverse neurological manifestations, mechanisms, and functional and structural assessments needed to investigate TA-related seizure liabilities, with a particular focus on nonclinical species. Accurate discrimination of seizures from convulsions (irregular involuntary body and/or limb movements) and the nuanced presentation of different seizure types (partial vs. general) and phases (prodromal, ictal, and postictal) are essential for discerning their clinical implications. In nonclinical safety testing, the most direct evaluation method to confirm existence of seizures is electroencephalography (EEG) while clinical endpoints (e.g., functional observational batteries [FOB], comprehensive neurological examinations) and neuropathological findings (e.g., neuronal necrosis in tissue sections, raised biomarker levels in cerebrospinal fluid or serum) can indicate a seizure liability and provide additional guidance to identify the origin, frequency, and severity of seizures needed to align nonclinical effects with clinical relevance. In general, the regulatory perspective is that seizures identified in nonclinical species as well as potential risk management strategies (e.g., safety margin considerations, dosing paradigms, and clinical monitoring) translate effectively for purposes of clinical risk assessment.

识别和理解药物开发中的扣押责任。
癫痫发作是影响一个或多个脑神经元群的复杂电生理紊乱。试验品(TA)暴露后癫痫发作对药物开发构成重大挑战。本文考虑了不同的神经学表现,机制,以及研究ta相关癫痫发作责任所需的功能和结构评估,特别关注非临床物种。准确区分痉挛发作(不规则的不自主的身体和/或肢体运动)以及不同发作类型(部分与一般)和阶段(前驱、发作和发作后)的细微表现对于辨别其临床意义至关重要。在非临床安全性测试中,确认癫痫发作存在的最直接评估方法是脑电图(EEG),而临床终点(如功能观察电池[FOB],综合神经学检查)和神经病理学结果(如组织切片神经元坏死,脑脊液或血清中生物标志物水平升高)可以指示癫痫发作的可能性,并为确定病因、频率、癫痫发作的严重程度需要将非临床效应与临床相关性结合起来。一般来说,监管的观点是,在非临床物种中发现的癫痫发作以及潜在的风险管理策略(例如,安全边际考虑,给药范例和临床监测)有效地转化为临床风险评估的目的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
4.50%
发文量
53
审稿时长
4.5 months
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Toxicology publishes timely, peer-reviewed papers on current topics important to toxicologists. Six bi-monthly issues cover a wide range of topics, including contemporary issues in toxicology, safety assessments, novel approaches to toxicological testing, mechanisms of toxicity, biomarkers, and risk assessment. The Journal also publishes invited reviews on contemporary topics, and features articles based on symposia. In addition, supplemental issues are routinely published on various special topics, including three supplements devoted to contributions from the Cosmetic Review Expert Panel.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信