Barriers and facilitators of acceptability and uptake of long-acting reversible contraceptives in Ethiopia: a systematic review using the COM-B model.

IF 6.3 4区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Tariku Shimels, Zewdneh Shewamene, Getachew Teshome
{"title":"Barriers and facilitators of acceptability and uptake of long-acting reversible contraceptives in Ethiopia: a systematic review using the COM-B model.","authors":"Tariku Shimels, Zewdneh Shewamene, Getachew Teshome","doi":"10.1186/s13643-025-02827-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Long-acting reversible contraceptives (LARCs), including implants and intrauterine contraceptive devices (IUCDs), are essential in preventing unintended pregnancies and empowering women by providing long-term, reliable contraception that supports informed decision-making about family planning and reproductive health. However, their uptake and acceptability remain low in Ethiopia due to various individual, social, and systemic barriers. This study systematically reviews the factors influencing LARC acceptability and utilization among Ethiopian women, adolescents, and healthcare providers, using the Capability, Opportunity, Motivation, and Behaviour (COM-B) framework.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic search of PubMed, Embase, Scopus, African Journals OnLine, and EBSCOhost (CINAHL) was conducted, along with gray literature sources, to identify studies published between January 2021 and June 2024. Inclusion criteria encompassed studies conducted in Ethiopia that examined the acceptability and utilization of LARCs, focusing on implants and IUCDs. The types of studies considered included quantitative, qualitative, and mixed-method designs, focusing on postpartum, post-abortion, and nonpostpartum women, adolescents, and healthcare providers. Data on barriers, facilitators, and associated factors of acceptability and utilization were extracted, and the findings were mapped to the COM-B framework. Atlas.ti v.9 software was used in the analysis process.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 58 cross-sectional, qualitative, and mixed-method studies were included, encompassing diverse Ethiopian populations and geographies. Among immediate and extended postpartum women, barriers included limited awareness and fear of insertion pain for IUCDs, low awareness, and limited access to LARCs, while postpartum counselling emerged as a facilitator. For adolescents, social stigma, male partner disapproval, and misconceptions about LARC side effects were prominent barriers; school-based education and youth-friendly services supported acceptability. Healthcare providers noted inadequate training on family planning methods as a barrier, while targeted training improved their confidence in recommending LARCs. Nonpostpartum women frequently cited partner opposition and cultural beliefs as barriers, but family planning programs with partner engagement facilitated greater acceptance.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The findings highlight an urgent need to expand community-based education programs to dispel myths and misconceptions about LARCs, particularly in rural and pastoral regions. Prioritizing provider training to improve counselling and service delivery, alongside engaging male partners in family planning discussions, is essential for enhancing LARC utilization and meeting reproductive health needs in Ethiopia.</p><p><strong>Systematic review registration: </strong>PROSPERO CRD42024594288.</p>","PeriodicalId":22162,"journal":{"name":"Systematic Reviews","volume":"14 1","pages":"99"},"PeriodicalIF":6.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12048933/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Systematic Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-025-02827-x","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Long-acting reversible contraceptives (LARCs), including implants and intrauterine contraceptive devices (IUCDs), are essential in preventing unintended pregnancies and empowering women by providing long-term, reliable contraception that supports informed decision-making about family planning and reproductive health. However, their uptake and acceptability remain low in Ethiopia due to various individual, social, and systemic barriers. This study systematically reviews the factors influencing LARC acceptability and utilization among Ethiopian women, adolescents, and healthcare providers, using the Capability, Opportunity, Motivation, and Behaviour (COM-B) framework.

Methods: A systematic search of PubMed, Embase, Scopus, African Journals OnLine, and EBSCOhost (CINAHL) was conducted, along with gray literature sources, to identify studies published between January 2021 and June 2024. Inclusion criteria encompassed studies conducted in Ethiopia that examined the acceptability and utilization of LARCs, focusing on implants and IUCDs. The types of studies considered included quantitative, qualitative, and mixed-method designs, focusing on postpartum, post-abortion, and nonpostpartum women, adolescents, and healthcare providers. Data on barriers, facilitators, and associated factors of acceptability and utilization were extracted, and the findings were mapped to the COM-B framework. Atlas.ti v.9 software was used in the analysis process.

Results: A total of 58 cross-sectional, qualitative, and mixed-method studies were included, encompassing diverse Ethiopian populations and geographies. Among immediate and extended postpartum women, barriers included limited awareness and fear of insertion pain for IUCDs, low awareness, and limited access to LARCs, while postpartum counselling emerged as a facilitator. For adolescents, social stigma, male partner disapproval, and misconceptions about LARC side effects were prominent barriers; school-based education and youth-friendly services supported acceptability. Healthcare providers noted inadequate training on family planning methods as a barrier, while targeted training improved their confidence in recommending LARCs. Nonpostpartum women frequently cited partner opposition and cultural beliefs as barriers, but family planning programs with partner engagement facilitated greater acceptance.

Conclusions: The findings highlight an urgent need to expand community-based education programs to dispel myths and misconceptions about LARCs, particularly in rural and pastoral regions. Prioritizing provider training to improve counselling and service delivery, alongside engaging male partners in family planning discussions, is essential for enhancing LARC utilization and meeting reproductive health needs in Ethiopia.

Systematic review registration: PROSPERO CRD42024594288.

埃塞俄比亚长效可逆避孕措施的可接受性和吸收的障碍和促进因素:使用COM-B模型的系统审查。
背景:长效可逆避孕药具(LARCs),包括植入物和宫内节育器(IUCDs),通过提供长期、可靠的避孕措施,支持有关计划生育和生殖健康的知情决策,对预防意外怀孕和增强妇女权能至关重要。然而,由于各种个人、社会和系统障碍,它们在埃塞俄比亚的吸收和接受程度仍然很低。本研究使用能力、机会、动机和行为(COM-B)框架,系统地回顾了影响埃塞俄比亚妇女、青少年和医疗保健提供者接受和利用LARC的因素。方法:系统检索PubMed、Embase、Scopus、African Journals OnLine和EBSCOhost (CINAHL),以及灰色文献来源,以确定在2021年1月至2024年6月期间发表的研究。纳入标准包括在埃塞俄比亚进行的研究,这些研究审查了larc的可接受性和利用情况,重点是植入物和宫内节育器。考虑的研究类型包括定量、定性和混合方法设计,重点关注产后、流产后和非产后妇女、青少年和医疗保健提供者。提取了障碍、促进因素以及可接受性和利用率相关因素的数据,并将研究结果映射到COM-B框架中。阿特拉斯。分析过程采用Ti v.9软件。结果:共纳入了58项横断面、定性和混合方法研究,涵盖了不同的埃塞俄比亚人口和地理区域。在刚产后和产后较长时间的妇女中,障碍包括对宫内节育器插入疼痛的认识有限和恐惧,认识低,以及获得larc的机会有限,而产后咨询则成为促进因素。对青少年来说,社会污名化、男性伴侣不赞成和对LARC副作用的误解是主要障碍;校本教育和青年友好服务支持可接受性。保健提供者指出,计划生育方法培训不足是一个障碍,而有针对性的培训提高了他们推荐生育控制中心的信心。非产后妇女经常将伴侣的反对和文化信仰作为障碍,但有伴侣参与的计划生育项目促进了更大程度的接受。结论:研究结果强调,迫切需要扩大以社区为基础的教育项目,以消除对LARCs的误解和误解,特别是在农村和牧区。优先培训提供者以改进咨询和提供服务,同时让男性伙伴参与计划生育讨论,这对于提高对LARC的利用和满足埃塞俄比亚的生殖健康需求至关重要。系统评价注册:PROSPERO CRD42024594288。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Systematic Reviews
Systematic Reviews Medicine-Medicine (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
8.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
241
审稿时长
11 weeks
期刊介绍: Systematic Reviews encompasses all aspects of the design, conduct and reporting of systematic reviews. The journal publishes high quality systematic review products including systematic review protocols, systematic reviews related to a very broad definition of health, rapid reviews, updates of already completed systematic reviews, and methods research related to the science of systematic reviews, such as decision modelling. At this time Systematic Reviews does not accept reviews of in vitro studies. The journal also aims to ensure that the results of all well-conducted systematic reviews are published, regardless of their outcome.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信