An artificial intelligence model for nuclear grading of clear cell renal cell carcinoma using whole slide images: a retrospective, multicentre, diagnostic study.

IF 12.5 2区 医学 Q1 SURGERY
Qingyuan Zheng, Li Wei, Yang Zhou, Rui Yang, Panpan Jiao, Haonan Mei, Kai Wang, Xinmiao Ni, Xiangxiang Yang, Jiejun Wu, Junjie Fan, Tian Liu, Jingping Yuan, Xiaodong Weng, Xiuheng Liu, Zhiyuan Chen
{"title":"An artificial intelligence model for nuclear grading of clear cell renal cell carcinoma using whole slide images: a retrospective, multicentre, diagnostic study.","authors":"Qingyuan Zheng, Li Wei, Yang Zhou, Rui Yang, Panpan Jiao, Haonan Mei, Kai Wang, Xinmiao Ni, Xiangxiang Yang, Jiejun Wu, Junjie Fan, Tian Liu, Jingping Yuan, Xiaodong Weng, Xiuheng Liu, Zhiyuan Chen","doi":"10.1097/JS9.0000000000002484","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The pathological assessment of International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) nuclear grading is crucial for the management of clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC). We aimed to develop an artificial intelligence (AI)-based, high-efficiency, and high-accuracy ccRCC ISUP Grading Diagnostic System (RIGDAS) and evaluate its clinical application value.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this multicentre, retrospective, diagnostic study, consecutive ccRCC patients who underwent partial or complete nephrectomy between 1 June 2014 and 1 June 2024 across three Chinese hospitals and two public cohorts were included. Pathological slides from these surgeries were collected and digitized into whole slide images for model development and validation. The primary endpoint was the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) of RIGDAS. Additionally, the performance and review time of pathologists assisted with RIGDAS were evaluated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 5,697 slides from 1,807 ccRCC patients were collected and digitized for training and validating RIGDAS. Across the training and validation datasets, RIGDAS achieved an AUC ranging from 0.943 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.927-0.971) to 0.980 (0.960-1.989). In the human-AI comparison and collaboration study, RIGDAS achieved an accuracy (0.930 [0.907-0.951]) that was 3.3-4.3% higher than the accuracy of two junior pathologists (0.897 [0.883-0.916], P = 0.004; 0.887 [0.871-0.904], P = 0.001) and was comparable to the accuracy of two senior pathologists (0.960 [0.948-0.977] and 0.970 [0.961-0.986], both P > 0.05). Furthermore, RIGDAS significantly improved the diagnostic accuracy of the two junior pathologists to the level of the senior pathologists (P > 0.05) and greatly reduced the slide review time for all four pathologists (20.5-45.1%, all P < 0.0001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>RIGDAS demonstrated decent ability in diagnosing ISUP nuclear grading in ccRCC, reducing the likelihood of misdiagnosis by pathologists, and decreasing the time required for pathological slide review, highlighting its potential for clinical application.</p>","PeriodicalId":14401,"journal":{"name":"International journal of surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":12.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/JS9.0000000000002484","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The pathological assessment of International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) nuclear grading is crucial for the management of clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC). We aimed to develop an artificial intelligence (AI)-based, high-efficiency, and high-accuracy ccRCC ISUP Grading Diagnostic System (RIGDAS) and evaluate its clinical application value.

Methods: In this multicentre, retrospective, diagnostic study, consecutive ccRCC patients who underwent partial or complete nephrectomy between 1 June 2014 and 1 June 2024 across three Chinese hospitals and two public cohorts were included. Pathological slides from these surgeries were collected and digitized into whole slide images for model development and validation. The primary endpoint was the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) of RIGDAS. Additionally, the performance and review time of pathologists assisted with RIGDAS were evaluated.

Results: A total of 5,697 slides from 1,807 ccRCC patients were collected and digitized for training and validating RIGDAS. Across the training and validation datasets, RIGDAS achieved an AUC ranging from 0.943 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.927-0.971) to 0.980 (0.960-1.989). In the human-AI comparison and collaboration study, RIGDAS achieved an accuracy (0.930 [0.907-0.951]) that was 3.3-4.3% higher than the accuracy of two junior pathologists (0.897 [0.883-0.916], P = 0.004; 0.887 [0.871-0.904], P = 0.001) and was comparable to the accuracy of two senior pathologists (0.960 [0.948-0.977] and 0.970 [0.961-0.986], both P > 0.05). Furthermore, RIGDAS significantly improved the diagnostic accuracy of the two junior pathologists to the level of the senior pathologists (P > 0.05) and greatly reduced the slide review time for all four pathologists (20.5-45.1%, all P < 0.0001).

Conclusion: RIGDAS demonstrated decent ability in diagnosing ISUP nuclear grading in ccRCC, reducing the likelihood of misdiagnosis by pathologists, and decreasing the time required for pathological slide review, highlighting its potential for clinical application.

利用全幻灯片图像对透明细胞肾细胞癌进行核分级的人工智能模型:一项回顾性、多中心、诊断研究。
背景:国际泌尿病理学会(ISUP)核分级的病理评估对透明细胞肾细胞癌(ccRCC)的治疗至关重要。本研究旨在开发基于人工智能(AI)、高效、高精度的ccRCC ISUP分级诊断系统(RIGDAS),并评估其临床应用价值。方法:在这项多中心、回顾性、诊断性研究中,纳入了2014年6月1日至2024年6月1日期间在中国三家医院和两个公共队列中接受部分或完全肾切除术的连续ccRCC患者。收集这些手术的病理切片并将其数字化成完整的切片图像,用于模型的开发和验证。主要终点为受试者工作特征曲线下面积(AUC)。此外,还评估了在RIGDAS协助下的病理学家的工作表现和复习时间。结果:共收集了1807例ccRCC患者的5697张幻灯片,并将其数字化,用于培训和验证RIGDAS。在训练和验证数据集中,RIGDAS的AUC范围为0.943(95%置信区间[CI], 0.927-0.971)至0.980(0.960-1.989)。在人-人工智能对比与协作研究中,RIGDAS的准确率为0.930[0.907-0.951],比两位初级病理学家的准确率(0.897 [0.883-0.916],P = 0.004;0.887 [0.871-0.904], P = 0.001),与两位资深病理医师的准确率(0.960[0.948-0.977]、0.970 [0.961-0.986],P均为0.05)相当。此外,RIGDAS将2名初级病理学家的诊断准确率显著提高到高级病理学家的水平(P < 0.05),并大大缩短了4名病理学家的切片检查时间(20.5-45.1%,P < 0.0001)。结论:RIGDAS在ccRCC的ISUP核分级诊断中表现出较好的能力,减少了病理医师的误诊可能性,减少了病理切片检查所需的时间,突出了其临床应用潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
17.70
自引率
3.30%
发文量
0
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Surgery (IJS) has a broad scope, encompassing all surgical specialties. Its primary objective is to facilitate the exchange of crucial ideas and lines of thought between and across these specialties.By doing so, the journal aims to counter the growing trend of increasing sub-specialization, which can result in "tunnel-vision" and the isolation of significant surgical advancements within specific specialties.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信