Evaluating the Impact of the Failure Mode and Effects Analysis Nursing Approach on Complications of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Patients With Respiratory Failure.

IF 1 4区 医学 Q3 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
British journal of hospital medicine Pub Date : 2025-04-25 Epub Date: 2025-04-07 DOI:10.12968/hmed.2024.0807
Deli Xie, Xiuyun Zheng, Lingcong Peng
{"title":"Evaluating the Impact of the Failure Mode and Effects Analysis Nursing Approach on Complications of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Patients With Respiratory Failure.","authors":"Deli Xie, Xiuyun Zheng, Lingcong Peng","doi":"10.12968/hmed.2024.0807","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Aims/Background</b> Noninvasive intermittent positive pressure ventilation is a widely used approach for managing Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) complicated with respiratory failure. Treatment procedures often result in severe complications, requiring the implementation of proactive and effective nursing measures. Therefore, this study investigated the impact of failure mode and effects analysis (FMEA) on preventing complications in COPD patients with respiratory failure and assessed its influence on negative emotions, hope level, and quality of life. <b>Methods</b> This retrospective study included 356 patients with COPD combined with respiratory failure who underwent treatment in the First Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, China, between January 2023 and December 2023. Patients receiving usual care were included in the care-as-usual (CAU) group (n = 204), and those who underwent FMEA were assigned to the FMEA group (n = 152). Baseline characteristics and clinical data were compared between the two groups. Furthermore, the Self-rating Anxiety Scale (SAS), Self-rating Depression Scale (SDS), Herth Hope Index (HHI) and 36-item Short-Form were collected and comparatively analyzed between the two groups. <b>Results</b> The FMEA group exhibited a significantly lower incidence of facial compression injury, dry mouth, phlegm obstruction, flatulence, bronchiectasis, and aspiration pneumonia than the CAU group (<i>p</i> < 0.05). After the intervention, the SAS and SDS scores were significantly reduced in the FMEA group than in the CAU group (<i>p</i> < 0.001). The temporality and future, positive readiness and expectancy, inter-connectedness, and HHI scale total scores were significantly higher in the FMEA group compared to the CAU group (<i>p</i> < 0.05). The physiological function, role-physical, body pain, general health perceptions, vitality, social functioning, role-emotional, and mental health of patients were significantly higher in the FMEA group than in the CAU group (<i>p</i> < 0.05). <b>Conclusion</b> The application of the FMEA nursing approach helps reduce the risk of complications in patients with COPD combined with respiratory failure, while effectively reducing anxiety and depression, improving their hope level and enhancing their overall quality of life. These observations offer a basis for preventing complications, and provide a reference for the formulation of nursing plans for these patients in clinical practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":9256,"journal":{"name":"British journal of hospital medicine","volume":"86 4","pages":"1-16"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British journal of hospital medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12968/hmed.2024.0807","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/4/7 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aims/Background Noninvasive intermittent positive pressure ventilation is a widely used approach for managing Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) complicated with respiratory failure. Treatment procedures often result in severe complications, requiring the implementation of proactive and effective nursing measures. Therefore, this study investigated the impact of failure mode and effects analysis (FMEA) on preventing complications in COPD patients with respiratory failure and assessed its influence on negative emotions, hope level, and quality of life. Methods This retrospective study included 356 patients with COPD combined with respiratory failure who underwent treatment in the First Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, China, between January 2023 and December 2023. Patients receiving usual care were included in the care-as-usual (CAU) group (n = 204), and those who underwent FMEA were assigned to the FMEA group (n = 152). Baseline characteristics and clinical data were compared between the two groups. Furthermore, the Self-rating Anxiety Scale (SAS), Self-rating Depression Scale (SDS), Herth Hope Index (HHI) and 36-item Short-Form were collected and comparatively analyzed between the two groups. Results The FMEA group exhibited a significantly lower incidence of facial compression injury, dry mouth, phlegm obstruction, flatulence, bronchiectasis, and aspiration pneumonia than the CAU group (p < 0.05). After the intervention, the SAS and SDS scores were significantly reduced in the FMEA group than in the CAU group (p < 0.001). The temporality and future, positive readiness and expectancy, inter-connectedness, and HHI scale total scores were significantly higher in the FMEA group compared to the CAU group (p < 0.05). The physiological function, role-physical, body pain, general health perceptions, vitality, social functioning, role-emotional, and mental health of patients were significantly higher in the FMEA group than in the CAU group (p < 0.05). Conclusion The application of the FMEA nursing approach helps reduce the risk of complications in patients with COPD combined with respiratory failure, while effectively reducing anxiety and depression, improving their hope level and enhancing their overall quality of life. These observations offer a basis for preventing complications, and provide a reference for the formulation of nursing plans for these patients in clinical practice.

失效模式及效果分析护理方法对慢性阻塞性肺疾病合并呼吸衰竭并发症的影响
目的/背景无创间歇正压通气是治疗慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)合并呼吸衰竭的一种广泛应用的方法。治疗过程往往导致严重的并发症,需要实施积极有效的护理措施。因此,本研究探讨失败模式与效果分析(failure mode and effects analysis, FMEA)对COPD合并呼吸衰竭患者预防并发症的影响,并评估其对患者负面情绪、希望水平和生活质量的影响。方法回顾性研究纳入2023年1月至2023年12月在中国温州医科大学第一附属医院接受治疗的356例COPD合并呼吸衰竭患者。接受常规护理的患者被纳入常规护理(CAU)组(n = 204),接受FMEA的患者被分配到FMEA组(n = 152)。比较两组患者的基线特征和临床资料。收集两组焦虑自评量表(SAS)、抑郁自评量表(SDS)、赫斯希望指数(HHI)及36项问卷进行比较分析。结果FMEA组患者面部压迫损伤、口干、痰阻、胀气、支气管扩张、吸入性肺炎的发生率明显低于CAU组(p < 0.05)。干预后,FMEA组SAS和SDS评分显著低于CAU组(p < 0.001)。FMEA组的时间和未来、积极准备和期望、相互联系和HHI量表总分显著高于CAU组(p < 0.05)。FMEA组患者的生理功能、角色-身体、身体疼痛、一般健康感知、活力、社会功能、角色-情感和心理健康显著高于CAU组(p < 0.05)。结论FMEA护理方法的应用有助于降低COPD合并呼吸衰竭患者并发症的发生风险,同时有效减轻患者的焦虑和抑郁情绪,提高患者的希望水平,提高患者的整体生活质量。这些观察结果为预防并发症提供了依据,并为临床实践中对该类患者制定护理方案提供了参考。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
British journal of hospital medicine
British journal of hospital medicine 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
176
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: British Journal of Hospital Medicine was established in 1966, and is still true to its origins: a monthly, peer-reviewed, multidisciplinary review journal for hospital doctors and doctors in training. The journal publishes an authoritative mix of clinical reviews, education and training updates, quality improvement projects and case reports, and book reviews from recognized leaders in the profession. The Core Training for Doctors section provides clinical information in an easily accessible format for doctors in training. British Journal of Hospital Medicine is an invaluable resource for hospital doctors at all stages of their career. The journal is indexed on Medline, CINAHL, the Sociedad Iberoamericana de Información Científica and Scopus.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信